• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Monad and the Pleroma

nazz

Doubting Thomas
Several people keep bringing up the Monad. I don't think that exists anymore. Rather I see it as the Arche (Original Beginning) of Reality. But once it was expressed it began to differentiate leading to the Pleroma. I think each aeon (I am using that as a term meaning "space/time dimension") has its own original monad.

Regarding the Pleroma I wanted to share a little something I wrote in another post:

Life has been slowly evolving on this planet for billions of years. While many living things lead solitary lives occasionally there emerges a social species who to one degree or another share a collective consciousness. I think this is especially true of human beings because our advanced communication skills. With the advent of the world wide web this consciousness has become global in nature. Right now it is necessary to use language--written, verbal, and non-verbal--to effect this communication but I do believe there are instances when such communication becomes more direct--thought to thought, mind to mind.

I think there is a path of evolution that leads to godhood open to all of us. I think in many ways our species is already there. Just think of the enormous power we wield over this planet and the other creatures who share it with us (unfortunately we often do not use our power wisely).

For me, the Pleroma is simply the collective consciousness of the most advanced beings that exist and it is possible for us to evolve to become a part of that. In that aeon (as I use the word) there is perfect direct communication between all members. There is perfect harmony as well. But each member is still an individual within that whole. The One is many, and the Many, one.

Thoughts?
 

ELoWolfe

Member
I kept thinking of Mormonism as I read this. I am sorry if that offends.

I personally believe in a focused "Center," for lack of words, which I identify with the Monad. The Pleroma is a sort of heaven, a "World of Light," but what is in it I can't say. I know there are the Aeons, but besides that, I wouldn't know.
 

nazz

Doubting Thomas
I kept thinking of Mormonism as I read this. I am sorry if that offends.

No, not at all. But just because it might resemble Mormon beliefs doesn't make it wrong.;) But it is just an idea I have that makes sense to me. It also helps explain to me how Jesus can be both God (as part of the Pleroma) and yet a distinct person from God (the Father).

I personally believe in a focused "Center," for lack of words, which I identify with the Monad.

That "center" for me would be the Father that Christ spoke of. The Father being the first conscious being to emerge from the Bythos. So when only the Father was in existence he was the Monad in its actualized form. I believe the process that followed was something akin to cell division. Through this process the Son was born, the exact representation of his Father.

The Pleroma is a sort of heaven, a "World of Light," but what is in it I can't say. I know there are the Aeons, but besides that, I wouldn't know.

Well the Aeons would be the individuals within the Pleroma I spoke about. It is just that I believe our destiny is to become one of them and one with them.
 

biased

Active Member
The Monad is simply a synonym for the Source or Pleroma. I see them all as the same thing.
 

biased

Active Member
That's fine if you see it that way but that is now how the original Gnostics used those terms.

How do you know the way the original Gnostics used the term? Can you provide your source to substantiate that claim?
 
Top