The Most Agreeable Religion

[shunyadragon]

Thats not history. Please try to do better. Also, do a good analysis for all religions and all kinds of civilisations. I dont know what you are referring to as "history of religions cited" but all I saw was some "Islam did that, Islam did this", quoting Muslim countries and persecutions, etc etc which is just like gossiping over the fence.

Do better analysis.

Your failing to do your own homework. I did mine.

As referenced the history of the religions cited. In particular how religions relate to those who believe differently.

Persecution by and against Muslims occurs world wide among the ancient tribal religions.

https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Minorities/WG/11/Bangladeshi_3a.doc

 

[firedragon]

Your failing to do your own homework. I did mine.

Not good enough. If you want I can give you numbers, wars, battles, civilisations, a lot of data because I have done the legwork. I just do not go insulting other religions arbitrarily then go looking for some weblink about some countries to justify the claim I have already made.

If you want to discuss which civilisation murdered the most, no problem. You wish to do that? Lets see what kind of "home work" you had done. In a new thread of course.

 

[shunyadragon]

Not good enough. If you want I can give you numbers, wars, battles, civilisations, a lot of data because I have done the legwork. I just do not go insulting other religions arbitrarily then go looking for some weblink about some countries to justify the claim I have already made.

If you want to discuss which civilisation murdered the most, no problem. You wish to do that? Lets see what kind of "home work" you had done. In a new thread of course.

Facts pf history are not insulting religions. You have failed to provide anything, documentation nor history, whatsoever in response.

With references why would Islam be more agreeable to the diversity of religions in the world today?

 

[firedragon]

Facts pf history are not insulting religions. You have failed to provide anything, documentation nor history, whatsoever in response.

In response to what? What question did you ask me or what data did you ask me to provide? And when and where?

 

[firedragon]

With references why would Islam be more agreeable to the diversity of religions in the world today?

This is a question you are asking me new. Just now right? So lets not pretend you asked me this before. You were defending another question I asked from someone else who said "Secular humanism and Buddhism" are the most agreeable and that's based on how people have behaved in history. Simple assertion, and simple question was asked. What historical research have you done to make that assertion.

Anyway you ask me why Islam is the most agreeable right? Well, I never said in this thread that "Islam is the most agreeable". So you are asking an irrelevant question to me since I never made any claims here. Try and understand.

One should substantiate their claims with research. If the claimant has no research then it is only honesty to say "I dont have any research, but this is only my personal opinion based on no research".

First, do you understand that? If that is not understandable, no point having any conversation.

 

[shunyadragon]

This is a question you are asking me new. Just now right? So lets not pretend you asked me this before. You were defending another question I asked from someone else who said "Secular humanism and Buddhism" are the most agreeable and that's based on how people have behaved in history. Simple assertion, and simple question was asked. What historical research have you done to make that assertion.

Anyway you ask me why Islam is the most agreeable right? Well, I never said in this thread that "Islam is the most agreeable". So you are asking an irrelevant question to me since I never made any claims here. Try and understand.

One should substantiate their claims with research. If the claimant has no research then it is only honesty to say "I dont have any research, but this is only my personal opinion based on no research".

First, do you understand that? If that is not understandable, no point having any conversation.

Facts pf history are not insulting religions. You have failed to provide anything, documentation nor history, whatsoever in response.

With references why would Islam be more agreeable to the diversity of religions in the world today?

 

[firedragon]

Facts pf history are not insulting religions. You have failed to provide anything, documentation nor history, whatsoever in response.

Provide anything for what? Did you ask anything?

 

[Heyo]

Provide anything for what?

Your claim that Islam is the most agreeable religion.

Did you ask anything?

I asked. It is the theme of this thread.

And I think you have answered the question by your argumentation. We can be pretty sure now that Islam is not the most agreeable religion.

I claim that my judgement is the most agreeable position on this topic and I'm asking if anybody (except @firedragon) disagrees?

Unfortunately most of the other contenders have left, so I want to re-invite @danieldemol, @Snow White, @Altfish, @Secret Chief, @Lain, @Clara Tea, @Orbit, @Nakosis, @Mock Turtle and @oldbadger to advocate their favourites.

 

[firedragon]

Your claim that Islam is the most agreeable religion.

Where?

 

[Heyo]

Your claim that Islam is the most agreeable religion.

Where?

You don't favour Islam?
Then we have not only a vast majority for my claim but a consensus. That's great.

 

[Trailblazer]

The world has to unite. There can only be one religion. You are locked in with religious people from all faiths and denominations and you're not allowed to leave before you agreed on The One Religion™.
(Well, you can leave early if you agree to accept the result the others will settle on.)

What religion do you favour?

What do you think, which religion will make it?

I believe that the Baha'i Faith will make it because it is the religion that accepts all the other religions as true whereas none of the other religions will ever accept all the other religions as true.

Also, Baha'is believe that the world has to unite and we believe there will be one common faith in the future, since we believe that is what God has ordained.

“That which the Lord hath ordained as the sovereign remedy and mightiest instrument for the healing of all the world is the union of all its peoples in one universal Cause, one common Faith. This can in no wise be achieved except through the power of a skilled, an all-powerful and inspired Physician. This, verily, is the truth, and all else naught but error.”
The Summons of the Lord of Hosts, p. 91

 

[Heyo]

I believe that the Baha'i Faith will make it because it is the religion that accepts all the other religions as true whereas none of the other religions will ever accept all the other religions as true.

I don't know enough about the Baha'i Faith but I question this statement with ignorance.
You really think that all the gods of Hinduism, paganism, the Judeo-Christian-Islamic Faiths and the Flying Spaghetti Monster exist? (And at the same time that there is only one god? You see the contradiction?)

 

[firedragon]

You don't favour Islam?
Then we have not only a vast majority for my claim but a consensus. That's great.

Dont put words into other peoples mouths to create a strawman, attack it and feel good.

I didnt say I "dont favour Islam". I never brought Islam up in this thread.

 

[TransmutingSoul]

I don't know enough about the Baha'i Faith but I question this statement with ignorance.
You really think that all the gods of Hinduism, paganism, the Judeo-Christian-Islamic Faiths and the Flying Spaghetti Monster exist? (And at the same time that there is only one god? You see the contradiction?)

Yes they indeed do all exist, as One God allows us all those choices of thoughts. Mankind is now beginning to embrace its maturity, so the childish notions we have previously held to, will give way to more mature thought about our oneness, science and education will aid this maturity.

People will come to realise that Truth is Relative and that the greater truth is that we have One God who can only known by all the Messengers.

When that unfolds, many superstitions of the pass will start to vanish.

Regards Tony

 

[shunyadragon]

Provide anything for what? Did you ask anything?

The history of the religions relevant to the subject of the thread.

 

[firedragon]

The history of the religions relevant to the subject of the thread.

Exactly what I asked from a proponent who said "Secular Humanism and Buddhism". No reply yet.

You replied on behalf of him thought. Very good. But with no information.

 

[shunyadragon]

Exactly what I asked from a proponent who said "Secular Humanism and Buddhism". No reply yet.

You replied on behalf of him thought. Very good. But with no information.

Replied with citation. No response on your part relevant to the subject of the thread. Youe stonewalling.

If you are not willing to contribute anything nor references to relevant topic of the thread why are responding at all?

 

[firedragon]

Replied with citation. No response on your part relevant to the subject of the thread. Youe stonewalling.

Citation with research on history of how Buddhists behaved? Nah. You didnt give any.

 

[shunyadragon]

Citation with research on history of how Buddhists behaved? Nah. You didnt give any.

Replied with citations. No response on your part relevant to the subject of the thread. Youe stonewalling.

If you are not willing to contribute anything nor references to relevant topic of the thread why are responding at all?

 

[firedragon]

Replied with citations. No response on your part relevant to the subject of the thread. Youe stonewalling.

If you are not willing to contribute anything nor references to relevant topic of the thread why are responding at all?

You never did. Maybe you are hoping for something. You were trying to save someone else and demonise Islam. Irrelevant.

I am still waiting for statistics of Buddhists in history.