Revenge is a dish best served on Netflix?I figure it might be partial payback for Trump's attempt to dismantle the entire Obama presidential legacy.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Revenge is a dish best served on Netflix?I figure it might be partial payback for Trump's attempt to dismantle the entire Obama presidential legacy.
True. It is easier to respect someone that behaves respectably. But it is good also to remember, it is not the person who is special, it is the office, or the assignment. It is not the person behaving disrespectfully, but the position they hold that demands the respect. Because really if God has allowed the authority, the way you treat it is the way you treat God.
In Israel when God appointed Moses to lead the Israelites, and the people complained against Moses Jehovah took offense personally at it as if they were complaining directly against him.
Hmmm... Is Kim Jong Un to be respected? His office, maybe? His family won that office and shaped it into what it is today, and it will stay in their control for a very long time because of it. Plenty of blood (Christian blood as well) on those hands.
Maybe King George when he was trying to control America? Should we not have rebelled against him, and fight to be free of his rule? If we had just acquiesced to his rule, America would be in a much different place than it is now.
Can't say I agree with your position.
I'm not going to insult your intelligence. I am pleased that you have a mind of your own, but I also have one.The quote in the Law was given to the Jews, but its principle still holds true. It gives us the mind of God How he views authority.
I have not agreed to your pronounciation of the tetragrammaton nor of your notion of idol worship. The coin bears Caesar's image, but its just money. How you use the money is what matters I think. Its fine for you to think otherwise, but I don't want you to think I agree. I don't. When I pledge I don't pledge to sin or to disobey God or to put treaties and laws above morals. I pledge to ideals, the good ones.An example is recalled to mind now. It has to do with saluting of the flag. Jehovah's Witnesses view a pledge of allegiance to any flag as a form of idol worship and therefore refrain because of their worship to Jehovah God.
What about soldiers and police? They are enjoined not to press people for money, not to be corrupt. They aren't told to leave the military or the police force. They aren't called idolators by Jesus for their service to the military. Why would my participation as a citizen be considered such? Why not just be the best citizen I can be?
An example is recalled to mind now. It has to do with saluting of the flag.
...
The issue came to a head in one school
You've told me you know what the mind of God on the subject of allegiance and have put forward your own group as the exemplars of how allegiance to the flag should be eschewed. You have challenged that it is idolatry to God. It comes along with a claim to being a good authority on scripture and the mind of God. That is a challenge if I've ever heard one, in a debate section of a religious forum, too. Its a challenge to everyone in the thread criticizing the president, isn't it? Its saying "I think you folks are wrong, because here is what God says." The catch is you don't own what God's opinion is, so you can't be a source of information on it. Challenged by you its reasonable for me or anyone here to reply either with questions or statements. I think you can't answer my rhetorical question about citizenship, because it is logical. I don't think you have logical objections to participating, with God's approval, in the voting process, in the pledge to the flag, in participation in the military and police forces.What is the point of the questions?
You've told me you know what the mind of God on the subject of allegiance and have put forward your own group as the exemplars of how allegiance to the flag should be eschewed. You have challenged that it is idolatry to God. It comes along with a claim to being a good authority on scripture and the mind of God. That is a challenge if I've ever heard one, in a debate section of a religious forum, too. Its a challenge to everyone in the thread criticizing the president, isn't it? Its saying "I think you folks are wrong, because here is what God says." The catch is you don't own what God's opinion is, so you can't be a source of information on it. Challenged by you its reasonable for me or anyone here to reply either with questions or statements. I think you can't answer my rhetorical question about citizenship, because it is logical. I don't think you have logical objections to participating, with God's approval, in the voting process, in the pledge to the flag, in participation in the military and police forces.
Sounds like more trash, which Netflix is a bit of a dumping ground for.Vanity Fair Article
The series, to be aired on Netflix, is a combination documentary/comedy about the Trump Administration's massive incompetence in handling the 2016 transition between the Obama and Trump governments.
At first, the transition was more or less going well when Chris Christie was in charge of it, but then the easily manipulated Trump fired Christie at the behest of Jared Kushner, who was seeking revenge. Christie had put Kushner's father behind bars about a decade earlier on 18 criminal convictions for illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion, and witness tampering, and Kushner -- rather than blame his father for being a criminal -- blamed Christie for convicting his father of his crimes.
Following Christie's firing, Trump took over the transition more or less by himself, leading to hilarious (and disastrous) consequences.
Comments?
Alec Baldwin as Trump, of course. Although, they might get Trump himself. Rumor is he's going to need some cash flow quick.Who will be playing the presidents in the show?