• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The One Cause of Poverty That’s Never Considered

Kfox

Well-Known Member
You seriously don't have a clue of how macro-economics works. As anthropologists, we study societies all over the world, past and present. We know what income disparity can do to a society as it has happened so many times in the past.
Then provide some examples of when income inequality was at it’s greatest in the USA and the poor was worse off as a result. I’ve already provided some examples on post #130 when inequality lead to the poor better off to make my case; how about if you do the same to make your case
Sorry, but I'm not going to waste my time with your ignorance of the subject because I don't think you'd ever agree with the reality of the negative effects of income disparity.
Ahh so you aren't gonna waste your time with my ignorance? Of course! Why am I not surprised.
 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
Just for the record: Elon Musk's SpaceX has spent nearly $1.8 million on political lobbying this year, CNBC first reported. Meanwhile, Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin has spent just under $1.4 million, data from Open Secrets shows.-- Elon Musk's SpaceX has spent nearly $1.8 million on political lobbying this year, more than Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin.
And how are the middle income and poor worse off due to this? I think they are better off due to the jobs those companies create and the taxes generated as a result.
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
Interesting that you consider the only two options to be a Trump coup or the same old same old. What about an anarcho-syndicalist commune, where everyone takes turns to be a sort of executive officer for the week?



Still works out the same.
:Winner:
 

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
The Stock Market was at record high, and Unemployment was near record low under Trump. The poor, and minority business did very well under his administration as well.
you're totally out of touch with reality, I run a small business and times were not booming under Trump at all, in fact they were much worse than under Obama
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
That isn't profiting from the poor.
Moreover, I don't believe that anyone enjoys
wealth because there are poor people.
There are a lot of people who enjoy their wealth and wouldn't give away any of it - even when the poor have to pick up the tab for them.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
Yes there is a lot of jealousy by those who have less, rather than being happy they have more, they are unhappy because the other guy got a lot more. This is more of a jealousy problem than an economic one. ...

I am one of them. So you can read my mind.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Interesting that you consider the only two options to be a Trump coup or the same old same old. What about an anarcho-syndicalist commune, where everyone takes turns to be a sort of executive officer for the week?
It's more fun to imagine that you envisioned Trump's reign.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
There are a lot of people who enjoy their wealth and wouldn't give away any of it - even when the poor have to pick up the tab for them.
How are the poor picking up the tab?
I've never seen them or even the hoi polloi
at restaurants treating the gentry to meals.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Yes there is a lot of jealousy by those who have less, rather than being happy they have more, they are unhappy because the other guy got a lot more. This is more of a jealousy problem than an economic one.
True dat.
We see much of it here on RF.
Absurd. I can’t believe there are still people in the real world who still believe this. The US economy is NOT based on a zero/sum game, it is constructed in a way that there is unlimited potential for growth.
Consistent with their plight, many of the jealous poor don't
understand that creation of wealth can be done more ways
than working for more money. They can also cut their expenses,
or add value to things they own by sweat equity.


The reason we got off the Gold standard is because there is only a limited amount of gold in existence, but there is an unlimited amount of wealth to be created in the USA. If you disagree, I challenge you to point to a specific incident (sometime this century) where the rich got richer at the expense of the poor.
How have Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos influenced democracy?
Most Political Action Committees (PAC’s) influence for the benefit of the middle income and the poor.
The poor wield great power with their & allies votes.
Just look at Democrats' promises to them...some have
even been carried out.
But note that I think they could a far better job with
the money available. The poor need more help, &
less punishment than they're currently receiving.
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
Meh...everyone is biased.
But enuf about me...back to the issues...
That doesn't answer my question.
Someone has to pay taxes in a capitalist country. When the rich don't, the poor have to. That's how the rich get richer by letting the poor pay the taxes. When they pay into the system, they want return of investment, i.e. they finance campaigns of those who promise to cut taxes on the rich.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Someone has to pay taxes in a capitalist country. When the rich don't, the poor have to. That's how the rich get richer by letting the poor pay the taxes. When they pay into the system, they want return of investment, i.e. they finance campaigns of those who promise to cut taxes on the rich.
You'll learn something if you look up statistics
on who pays how much in taxes, & who
receives how much in social assistance.
It's not what you think.

The poor expensive. I favor enabling them
to become more productive.
 
Last edited:

Kfox

Well-Known Member
you're totally out of touch with reality, I run a small business and times were not booming under Trump at all, in fact they were much worse than under Obama
I'm sure there are plenty of business that did poorly under Trump, but there were a lot that did good under Trump. Under Trump;

*The unemployment rate for blacks reached a record low of 5.2 percent and black labor-force participation reached 63.2 percent,
*Black home ownership rose to nearly 50%
*Black weekly earnings rose at a slightly higher rate than white weekly earnings.
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
You'll learn something if you look up statistics
on who pays how much in taxes, & who
receives how much in social assistance.
It's not what you think.

The poor expensive. I favor enabling them
to become more productive.
1679771775209.png


This statistic?
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Yes! Under Obama, we sunk to the worse recession since the Depression and began coming out of it.
The Great Recession started under Bush, not Obama, and the congressional Pubs fought any bailout until they were told by economists that our entire economic system could crash until the DOW took a big noser and woke them up.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The Great Recession started under Bush, not Obama, and the congressional Pubs fought any bailout until they were told by economists that our entire economic system could crash until the DOW took a big noser and woke them up.
Could it be related to Bush's (don't read his lips) income tax increase?
 
Top