Koldo
Outstanding Member
Perhaps that god thought in terms of "baby steps"
Why would he do that?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Perhaps that god thought in terms of "baby steps"
I disagree, I think you're overestimating them. Can you not understand how different their culture was, How different their society was?
God ruled by fear, because that's all they understood. They were cruel, harsh primitive people who didn't fully understand or appreciate or value concepts like forgiveness, mercy, love, understanding and self-sacrifice.
And even though Jesus came and changed all that, Try and imagine a world without Jesus ever having been in it.
Their culture was pretty different. However, not so different that a powerful god had to succumb to their ways to reach them.
God didn't succumb to man, What a disillusioned thing to say.
God gives us free will, And so he used the most effective way to help them, Without taking their choices and free will away from them.
And I don't hail such people, regarding them as no better than petty bandits.
I have to wonder how many christians have read the whole Old Testament and have managed to keep an unchanged opinon of their god. I have to wonder how many have turned away from it after reading the OT.
It seems to me that the OT and the NT are so different that it seems their god has multiple personalities or something.
The amount of raping that occurred in the OT was horrifying.
From what I've read, Gnostic Christians believed that the god of the OT and the god of the NT were separate entities.
...I am not sure how that would work.
Not all Gnostic Christians. I believe it was mostly a Marcionite concept that infiltrated the later Gnostic movements. It was mostly a strictly later-Gnostic concept with groups like the Sethians. And even that's a bit debatable as to which of them believed the OT Jewish god was the Demiurge in disguise.
As for all the "raping", what parts are you talking about? The taking of virgins as war booty? What else were the girls supposed to do exactly? Their only other option back then was to become prostitutes when their city-state is destroyed. Besides, these Israelite warriors were strong, strapping, freshly-rich dudes. I'd personally bet many of them would be happier with that option than a life of whoredom. There was no social security back then. The only options really are: A) Marry your conqueror B) Whore yourself. Not much else for women back then.
There was also an early Christian leader, very passionate in his beliefs, but pre-NT, who read the Tanakh, and declared "That's not the God I believe in!" He actually started the idea of a Christian Bible, and created the first one out of a modified form of the Gospel of Luke (with all references to the Tanakh removed) and 10 of Paul's letters.
It's a bit more complex than that. Two gods that actually appear in both testaments.
Maybe if more christians understood this, non christians wouldnt find it so much of an issue.
I disagree, I think you're overestimating them. Can you not understand how different their culture was, How different their society was?
God ruled by fear, because that's all they understood. They were cruel, harsh primitive people who didn't fully understand or appreciate or value concepts like forgiveness, mercy, love, understanding and self-sacrifice.
And even though Jesus came and changed all that, Try and imagine a world without Jesus ever having been in it.
LOL, you should look at the list Torah laws regaurding "forgiveness, mercy, love, understanding, and self sacrifice" that was posted in this thread.
I would imagine the world would be much the same as it would be now had Jesus never lived in it. I would also believe that are Jewish friends would think much the same lol.
Lastly, as a Christian, how do you go about worshipping YHVH?
If he didn't, that is even worse actually.
Since all OT actions endorsed by god would be a perfect reflection of god's ways in that case.
The most effective way to help them? Why do you think so?
Who was this person? You can send me a PM if you don't want to derail this amazing thread.
The entire Viking religion aside from the myth part was based on conquest and pillage and receiving blessings from the gods to have good conquest and plunder. If a Viking Revivalism doesn't inherit that part, it's not much of a revival.
I disagree, I think you're overestimating them. Can you not understand how different their culture was, How different their society was?
God ruled by fear, because that's all they understood. They were cruel, harsh primitive people who didn't fully understand or appreciate or value concepts like forgiveness, mercy, love, understanding and self-sacrifice.
And even though Jesus came and changed all that, Try and imagine a world without Jesus ever having been in it.
Are you Christian? I'm having trouble explaining myself, And I'm curious at to whether it's because you're not Christian or if it's something else.
I sincerly doubt Jew's would be happier without Jesus, Since they're still waiting for him and his promise to restore them.
Excellent point. He has brought a lot of misery upon jews.Jews are not waiting for Jesus. We are waiting for the messiah. We don't believe Jesus was the messiah, much less God. We think he was just another Jewish guy the Romans killed, with delusions of or aspirations to messiahdom-- no different than hundreds of other guys running around ancient Israel at that time.
Most likely, Jews would have been much happier in a world without Jesus, since no Christianity would've meant no oppression by governments that labeled us Christ-killers and devil-worshippers, no pogroms, no Crusades, no Inquisition, no being driven out of the countries we lived in because the church stirred up the local rulers against us-- perhaps no Holocaust, even.
Why would we ever wait for Jesus, when Christianity has brought us nothing but misery and cruelty?
Excellent point. He has brought a lot of misery upon jews.
All of history, no matter whose it is, is violent. People are drawn to watch American football, and that is a violent sport. Don't even get me started on wrestling and boxing. Wars are being waged even now. Violence happens in gangs. I hear about murders every day of my life on the news. Why do expect the Tanakh to be any different when it comes to the history. People are people.
But, at the same time, everyone is overlooking the Psalms, Proverbs, Ruth, and others. It shows that despite violence that happens in every culture there is always some beauty mixed in with it.
Why would he do that?
This is certainly true.Jews are not waiting for Jesus. We are waiting for the messiah. We don't believe Jesus was the messiah, much less God.
This, however, is outrageous and totally uncalled for. On what basis do you embrace the diaspora inspired NT depiction of some Jerusalem sect leader as accurate and authentic?We think he was just another Jewish guy the Romans killed, with delusions of or aspirations to messiahdom-- no different than hundreds of other guys running around ancient Israel at that time.
You have absolutely no idea what it would have meant and neither do I.Most likely, Jews would have been much happier in a world without Jesus, since no Christianity would've meant ...
Only a lot of his followers brought misery, not Jesus himself.