The Reality of God

[Ostronomos]

According to the RSS Principle by Langan, Quantum wavefunctions require a background identity of G.O.D who resides within a place of pure light or ultimate reality to bridge the processing and display functions of reality together. Recall that processing is not displayed in the world around us.

 

[kadzbiz]

According to the RSS Principle by Langan, Quantum wavefunctions require a background identity of G.O.D who resides within a place of pure light or ultimate reality to bridge the processing and display functions of reality together. Recall that processing is not displayed in the world around us.

None of this makes sense to me.

 

[Hermit Philosopher]

None of this makes sense to me.

@kadzbiz; I like the simplicity and sincerity in that answer!

@Ostronomos, I don’t click on links but I understand your thinking and I agree with the ideas. It’s the language-thing, though.

To make sense to others; when you speak with people of faith, you must speak their language. There are religious terms for everything you are trying to get across here.

When you speak to materialists, you must speak their language. Many aspects of spirituality can be expressed mathematically and through theoretical physics.


Humbly,
Hermit

 

[Valjean]

According to the RSS Principle by Langan, Quantum wavefunctions require a background identity of G.O.D who resides within a place of pure light or ultimate reality to bridge the processing and display functions of reality together. Recall that processing is not displayed in the world around us.

Interesting. Apologist 'evidence' has been retreating to the margins of knowledge for centuries, as natural explanations for evidentiary phenomena were found. Has it now been pushed into quantum explanations?

Traditionally, gods are conceived of as discrete, conscious beings, not as forces, energies or laws.

 

[Valjean]

According to the RSS Principle by Langan, Quantum wavefunctions require a background identity of G.O.D who resides within a place of pure light or ultimate reality to bridge the processing and display functions of reality together. Recall that processing is not displayed in the world around us.

Interesting. Apologist 'evidence' has been retreating to the margins of knowledge for centuries, as natural explanations for evidentiary phenomena were found. Has it now been pushed into quantum explanations?

Traditionally, gods are conceived of as discrete, conscious beings, not as forces, energies or laws.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Interesting. Apologist 'evidence' has been retreating to the margins of knowledge for centuries, as natural explanations for evidentiary phenomena were found. Has it now been pushed into quantum explanations?

Traditionally, gods are conceived of as discrete, conscious beings, not as forces, energies or laws.

Well, it is all philosophy in the end.
Here is an example of scientific metaphysical idealism:

Mathematical universe hypothesis - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[PureX]

You're using the language of a mile to illuminate the significance of a foot. It's very grandiose idea in relation to the significance of it's content.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

You're using the language of a mile to illuminate the significance of a foot. It's very grandiose idea in relation to the significance of it's content.

Can you rephrase that?

 

[PureX]

Can you rephrase that?

"God is the 'medium' between process and result." I agree. Although I would add intent to that process. As the result certainly appears to have been intentional. But what IS that medium? ... **silence**

That 'medium' is the difference between what is possible, and what is not possible. But what governs that? We simply have no idea. Call it "God's will". Call it "the laws of physics". Doesn't matter what we call it, or how we choose to chatactetize it. It's still just our chosen fantasy answer: the God/physics of the gap.

 

[Ostronomos]

Interesting. Apologist 'evidence' has been retreating to the margins of knowledge for centuries, as natural explanations for evidentiary phenomena were found. Has it now been pushed into quantum explanations?

Traditionally, gods are conceived of as discrete, conscious beings, not as forces, energies or laws.

It does not conform to the margins of knowledge except in a metaphysical scientific sense.

This version of God is not conceived as a merely discrete conscious entity but also an energy that creates universes.

 

[Valjean]

It does not conform to the margins of knowledge except in a metaphysical scientific sense.

This version of God is not conceived as a merely discrete conscious entity but also an energy that creates universes.

So it violates the conservation laws?
How do you know it's conscious and invollved, or even concerned, with us? Does it have wants and preferences? Is it judgmental?

 

[Kfox]

According to the RSS Principle by Langan, Quantum wavefunctions require a background identity of G.O.D who resides within a place of pure light or ultimate reality to bridge the processing and display functions of reality together. Recall that processing is not displayed in the world around us.

According to the RSS principle, is G.O.D. a sentient being who is conscious and makes demands of us?

 

[Twilight Hue]

According to the RSS Principle by Langan, Quantum wavefunctions require a background identity of G.O.D who resides within a place of pure light or ultimate reality to bridge the processing and display functions of reality together. Recall that processing is not displayed in the world around us.

Is this an attempt to sound academic?