• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Royals Have Become Interesting

Diana would probably be alive today if she wore a seatbelt - that's what comes to mind whenever she is mentioned. :oops:

She would still have been alive if she had not left the hotel! But what we do know that if she still had her HRH France would have ensured her safety and better still her own security from England would have ensure her secure passage
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
She would still have been alive if she had not left the hotel! But what we do know that if she still had her HRH France would have ensured her safety and better still her own security from England would have ensure her secure passage
So that trumps using her own intelligence?
 
So that trumps using her own intelligence?

Was it her intelligence that killed her? As she no longer had her HRH why would the press be interested in her just living her life with her new partner? Why were the press still taking photos of her as she was dying? Hounded to her death. Charles should have ensured for the sake of their sons that she was protected.
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
Was it her intelligence that killed her? As she no longer had her HRH why would the press be interested in her just living her life with her new partner? Why were the press still taking photos of her as she was dying? Hounded to her death. Charles should have ensured for the sake of their sons that she was protected.
Well there are always some in the paparazzi willing to go one step further than most others in order to get their 'scoop' (and she was still seen as a 'celebrity') but where most will have more decency and respect. I don't know the circumstances of her protection so couldn't comment about such. Individual responsibility still exists, and she apparently made a mistake by not wearing her seatbelt.
 

stvdv

Veteran Member
Hey, did you ever curtsy to the Queen?
I missed out on your OP, till now:D. But finally I am up to date with the news again

Curtsey gives bad vibes to me, if there are any such feelings implied

A curtsy is a traditional gesture of greeting, in which a girl or woman bends her knees while bowing her head. It is the female equivalent of male bowing or genuflecting in Western cultures. Miss Manners characterizes its knee bend as deriving from a "traditional gesture of an inferior to a superior."
 

stvdv

Veteran Member
Hey, did you ever curtsy to the Queen?
From Christian POV, I think Curtsey with such feelings is kind of "not done" ... "Golden Calf" might be not too far off
I could imagine this must have been quite some sacrifice "our cute looking, young Meghan Markle had to make"
Not her favorite 'act' to perform, but "A Girl's Gotta Do What a Girl's Gotta Do, the show must go on, right?"

A curtsy is a traditional gesture of greeting, in which a girl or woman bends her knees while bowing her head. It is the female equivalent of male bowing or genuflecting in Western cultures. Miss Manners characterizes its knee bend as deriving from a "traditional gesture of an inferior to a superior."
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I begin to sense some hypocrisy. If the royal couple really
fled England because of hounding by the press, then they
wouldn't want to endure the even worse scrutiny of her
running for the presidency....just moving from a smaller
to a bigger fishbowl.

In the news.....
Meghan Markle reportedly planning to run for US president
Excerpted....
Meghan Markle is reportedly already networking with senior Democrats to help her ambitions to become the first female US president.
The Duchess of Sussex previously told friends about her political ambitions — and now hopes her blockbuster Oprah Winfrey interview will strengthen support in the US, sources told the Mail on Sunday newspaper.
She has been openly networking among senior Democrats to help build fundraising teams and a campaign for the White House, according to a senior UK politician who served under former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair and has close ties to Washington.

“The Blairite, internationalist and Democratic party networks are buzzing with talk about Meghan’s political ambitions and potential backers,” the anonymous source told the UK paper.

Markle, 39, is thought to be looking at the 2024 campaign if President Biden, who will be 82, decides against running for a second term, the source said. If successful, it would make her the first female US president.

Her biographer and friend, Omid Scobie, also previously claimed that the former actress “has her eyes set on the US presidency.”
 

Wu Wei

ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
I begin to sense some hypocrisy. If the royal couple really
fled England because of hounding by the press, then they
wouldn't want to endure the even worse scrutiny of her
running for the presidency....just moving from a smaller
to a bigger fishbowl.

In the news.....
Meghan Markle reportedly planning to run for US president
Excerpted....
Meghan Markle is reportedly already networking with senior Democrats to help her ambitions to become the first female US president.
The Duchess of Sussex previously told friends about her political ambitions — and now hopes her blockbuster Oprah Winfrey interview will strengthen support in the US, sources told the Mail on Sunday newspaper.
She has been openly networking among senior Democrats to help build fundraising teams and a campaign for the White House, according to a senior UK politician who served under former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair and has close ties to Washington.

“The Blairite, internationalist and Democratic party networks are buzzing with talk about Meghan’s political ambitions and potential backers,” the anonymous source told the UK paper.

Markle, 39, is thought to be looking at the 2024 campaign if President Biden, who will be 82, decides against running for a second term, the source said. If successful, it would make her the first female US president.

Her biographer and friend, Omid Scobie, also previously claimed that the former actress “has her eyes set on the US presidency.”

 
Well there are always some in the paparazzi willing to go one step further than most others in order to get their 'scoop' (and she was still seen as a 'celebrity') but where most will have more decency and respect. I don't know the circumstances of her protection so couldn't comment about such. Individual responsibility still exists, and she apparently made a mistake by not wearing her seatbelt.

I believe if you really believed what you write.. I don't know the circumstances of her protection so couldn't comment about such. Individual responsibility still exists,

Well there are always some in the paparazzi willing to go one step further than most others in order to get their 'scoop' (and she was still seen as a 'celebrity') but where most will have more decency and respect. I don't know the circumstances of her protection so couldn't comment about such. Individual responsibility still exists, and she apparently made a mistake by not wearing her seatbelt.
i
If you really do not know the details of her protection but for some strange reason thinking not wearing a seat belt would of have contributed to her death, Then should you be making comments without all the facts, Sometimes all the plants in news media cannot be seen in the woods for the trees, Whatever we believe ins immaterial. Diana told the world that they were planning to kill her off in a car crash, Could that have happened with her security?
We need to address all the issues. Thanks for replying to me MT.
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
I believe if you really believed what you write.. I don't know the circumstances of her protection so couldn't comment about such. Individual responsibility still exists,

i
If you really do not know the details of her protection but for some strange reason thinking not wearing a seat belt would of have contributed to her death, Then should you be making comments without all the facts, Sometimes all the plants in news media cannot be seen in the woods for the trees, Whatever we believe ins immaterial. Diana told the world that they were planning to kill her off in a car crash, Could that have happened with her security?
We need to address all the issues. Thanks for replying to me MT.
According to the doctor attending, a seatbelt would have saved her life. She suffered from a torn artery that was not detected (slow leak) and which would not have happened had she worn a seatbelt. The security person in the car survived because he was wearing a seatbelt. Her suspicions are that relevant? She didn't come across as that rational, or accepting of the best advice anyway - her TV interview (which I did see) indicated this.
 
Top