JDMS
Academic Workhorse
The shortcomings of religious institutions... or perhaps a religion's dependency on the institution.
(Skip to the bold below if you want to save time Before that is just a rant about the shrine I support.)
I've been thinking about this issue a lot lately, especially when it comes to Shinto. As someone who values access to religious sites/resources for all, I decided to become a member of the Tsubaki Grand Shrine of America a year ago to help support them, as they are the only qualified physical shrine in the continental US.
However, I have so many issues with the shrine now that I am reconsidering renewing my membership.
One of my biggest problems with the shrine is the fact that they seem to make bizarre management decisions that seem to be based on tourism outcomes more than they are meant to reflect a reverence for the kamisama. Some of the decisions are straight-up appalling.
The Tsubaki Grand Shrine of America used to have an Inari Shrine on the premises. However, when the goshintai (which is literally the kami's "body"; a sacred object that contains a part of the kami enshrined) was stolen, instead of replacing the goshintai again, or even demolishing the site and performing the necessary rites, they repurposed it! They removed all of the Inari Okami paraphernalia (except the torii, which is yet another disrespectful act, as Inari Okami's torii style is different than Ame-no-Uzume-no-Mikoto's) and replaced it with a "shrine" for the main kami's wife. Inari Okami's things are now collecting dust somewhere after being painstakingly transported from Japan.
This is like Inari Okami getting abducted, and then the police moving someone else into her home instead of prompting an investigation. Unheard of in Japan.
But they didn't even do that correctly. They erected an uncovered statue of Ame-no-Uzume-no-Mikoto as her goshintai instead. Again, this is criminally odd. In Shinto, the only kami whose goshintai are represented by anthropomorphic statues are syncretic gods or figures like the Buddha and a couple of other exceptions. Even kamisama that originated as historical figures or family members are not to be represented as humans, as it acts as though the kamisama are human-formed rather than abstracted forces. There is a reason that kamisama are typically given a title as a name, or are simply referred to by the name of the shrine.
Goshintai are also supposed to be hidden from view. They are meant to be protected and secured from any major disruptions. Kamisama should be able to enjoy company or quiet as they please. But Ame-no-Uzume-no-Mikoto's goshintai doesn't even have a roof over her head. She's exposed to all the elements now.
The Tsubaki Grand Shrine of America has managed to disrespect both Inari Okami and Ame-no-Uzume-no-Mikoto.
You could even argue that they disrespect Sarutahiko Okami, which is the kamisama the shrine is predominantly dedicated to. The Guji uses the interior of the shrine as an aikido dojo. This means that people are yelling, fighting, and sweating right in front of Sarutahiko Okami's goshintai. This could be considered okay by some, but it's not great. There's a reason the dojo in the Tsubaki Grand Shrine of Japan is separated. There's no valid reason to invade the sacred place for such a noisy and potentially unclean activity.
This is in addition to the fact that the Guji writes a load of New Agey nonsense on the shrine's Facebook page. But this is a personal gripe, it's not necessarily a serious complaint as the others are.
All this is making me wonder if supporting them is worth it. Sure, they are providing a service for Shinto practitioners in the US, but is it a quality service...?
OKAY! Personal experiences aside...
This leads me to the main point of the thread, which is acknowledging the weaknesses and limitations of religious institutions. Shinto in particular is heavily dependent on official institutions such as the Jinja Honcho. It's completely ritualistic in nature, and Shrine Shinto has been the pinnacle of worship for literally thousands of years. Since World War II, shrines are not really considered "official" unless the kannushi (priests) managing them are actually qualified by the Jinja Honcho.
This means that the quality of the practice is completely in the hands of the institution. If the available institutionally-approved resources available are sub-par, your entire practice is uprooted.
Other religions face similar issues. Christians often face the tough choice of whether donating or supporting a church is worth it if certain aspects of the church are not to their liking. One corrupted pastor can ruin an entire church. Mega-churches and tele-Evangelists are also constantly under fire as parts of their body or support are exposed as frauds.
A lot of religion is limited and negatively impacted by the very people that are meant to be trusted.
For this reason, I kind of envy other religions or spiritual paths that allow for solo-practice.
What are your guys' experiences with these kinds of issues? What can be done about them? Should all religions strive to develop a way to practice without the interference of institutions, or is there an inherent value to them that cannot be easily replaced by the public? I know everyone's answers will be different.
Thanks
(Skip to the bold below if you want to save time Before that is just a rant about the shrine I support.)
I've been thinking about this issue a lot lately, especially when it comes to Shinto. As someone who values access to religious sites/resources for all, I decided to become a member of the Tsubaki Grand Shrine of America a year ago to help support them, as they are the only qualified physical shrine in the continental US.
However, I have so many issues with the shrine now that I am reconsidering renewing my membership.
One of my biggest problems with the shrine is the fact that they seem to make bizarre management decisions that seem to be based on tourism outcomes more than they are meant to reflect a reverence for the kamisama. Some of the decisions are straight-up appalling.
The Tsubaki Grand Shrine of America used to have an Inari Shrine on the premises. However, when the goshintai (which is literally the kami's "body"; a sacred object that contains a part of the kami enshrined) was stolen, instead of replacing the goshintai again, or even demolishing the site and performing the necessary rites, they repurposed it! They removed all of the Inari Okami paraphernalia (except the torii, which is yet another disrespectful act, as Inari Okami's torii style is different than Ame-no-Uzume-no-Mikoto's) and replaced it with a "shrine" for the main kami's wife. Inari Okami's things are now collecting dust somewhere after being painstakingly transported from Japan.
This is like Inari Okami getting abducted, and then the police moving someone else into her home instead of prompting an investigation. Unheard of in Japan.
But they didn't even do that correctly. They erected an uncovered statue of Ame-no-Uzume-no-Mikoto as her goshintai instead. Again, this is criminally odd. In Shinto, the only kami whose goshintai are represented by anthropomorphic statues are syncretic gods or figures like the Buddha and a couple of other exceptions. Even kamisama that originated as historical figures or family members are not to be represented as humans, as it acts as though the kamisama are human-formed rather than abstracted forces. There is a reason that kamisama are typically given a title as a name, or are simply referred to by the name of the shrine.
Goshintai are also supposed to be hidden from view. They are meant to be protected and secured from any major disruptions. Kamisama should be able to enjoy company or quiet as they please. But Ame-no-Uzume-no-Mikoto's goshintai doesn't even have a roof over her head. She's exposed to all the elements now.
The Tsubaki Grand Shrine of America has managed to disrespect both Inari Okami and Ame-no-Uzume-no-Mikoto.
You could even argue that they disrespect Sarutahiko Okami, which is the kamisama the shrine is predominantly dedicated to. The Guji uses the interior of the shrine as an aikido dojo. This means that people are yelling, fighting, and sweating right in front of Sarutahiko Okami's goshintai. This could be considered okay by some, but it's not great. There's a reason the dojo in the Tsubaki Grand Shrine of Japan is separated. There's no valid reason to invade the sacred place for such a noisy and potentially unclean activity.
This is in addition to the fact that the Guji writes a load of New Agey nonsense on the shrine's Facebook page. But this is a personal gripe, it's not necessarily a serious complaint as the others are.
All this is making me wonder if supporting them is worth it. Sure, they are providing a service for Shinto practitioners in the US, but is it a quality service...?
OKAY! Personal experiences aside...
This leads me to the main point of the thread, which is acknowledging the weaknesses and limitations of religious institutions. Shinto in particular is heavily dependent on official institutions such as the Jinja Honcho. It's completely ritualistic in nature, and Shrine Shinto has been the pinnacle of worship for literally thousands of years. Since World War II, shrines are not really considered "official" unless the kannushi (priests) managing them are actually qualified by the Jinja Honcho.
This means that the quality of the practice is completely in the hands of the institution. If the available institutionally-approved resources available are sub-par, your entire practice is uprooted.
Other religions face similar issues. Christians often face the tough choice of whether donating or supporting a church is worth it if certain aspects of the church are not to their liking. One corrupted pastor can ruin an entire church. Mega-churches and tele-Evangelists are also constantly under fire as parts of their body or support are exposed as frauds.
A lot of religion is limited and negatively impacted by the very people that are meant to be trusted.
For this reason, I kind of envy other religions or spiritual paths that allow for solo-practice.
What are your guys' experiences with these kinds of issues? What can be done about them? Should all religions strive to develop a way to practice without the interference of institutions, or is there an inherent value to them that cannot be easily replaced by the public? I know everyone's answers will be different.
Thanks
Last edited: