• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Superiority of Jewish Thought. Or What Christians can Learn from Jews.

John D. Brey

Well-Known Member
When discussing metaphysics, many people don't understand that whereas in physics (as opposed to metaphysics), you have a referent and something that references it (the word "apple" is the reference for the referent: that red fruit sitting there on the table), in metaphysics you don't have the same duality between reference and referent.

In normal communication a word references a referent: "apple" references a red fruit that's the referent in the natural duality between reference and referent. -----But in metaphysics, in this case theology, the referent, the spiritual entity, God, or some theological concept, has no physical reality, like the apple does, so that when we speak of "God," we're not able to legitimately assume that the reference "God" has a physical referent, like the word "apple" has a physical referent. The non-Jewish mind is unintelligent or sloppy concerning such things so that even though there's no physical referent "God" that the word "God" references, that fact doesn't stop the non-Jewish mind from thinking of God as an immaterial referent whose non-physicality in no way damages the natural duality between reference and referent.

The miracle of the Jewish mind is its ability to understand that God's immateriality is not just absent physicality . . . as though that deficiency is minor (kind of an immaterial materiality) but to realize that if there's no materiality, then there's no dualistic relationship between the reference, and the referent, and thus no mediatable space between the two.

In Greek/Christian thought, you have referent, reference, and subject. The reference is the mediator between the subject and the referent. A word is a mediator between the subject, and the referent. If I want to tell someone I ate an "apple" I don't have to get a physical apple and take a bite in front of them. I can use the reference "apple" (the word) as mediator for the referent, the apple, when addressing a subject (my interlocutor). Judaism somehow came to intuit that in metaphysics this trinity of referent, reference, subject, breaks down. You can't do metaphysics the way you do physics, you can't speak of God, the way you speak of an apple, merely by positing that God is immaterial.

The Greeks and the Christians merely use the word "immaterial" as a bandage over a chasm the Jews, before anyone else, and singularly, appreciated as not something that can be handled in such a shallow and muddleheaded way. Jews, miraculously, intuited the genuine issues involved in the distinction between a material, pagan, idol, God, and the actual monotheistic God who is the creator of the physical world.

The rest of the world, Greek and Christian, merely paper over a distinction they don't even appreciate, such that for these, Jesus is the mediator between the subject, the Church, and the immaterial Father, who is out there somewhere watching us.

Judaism is completely correct that Jesus cannot be a mediator in the sense that Greek Christianity makes him a mediator. That kind of mediation is pagan, and doesn't even participate in the most magnificent insight given to humanity, through Judaism, that in metaphysics, the trinity of reference, referent, and subject, is a facade, a chimera, and a demonic ruse, generating misunderstanding toward, hatred for, and violence against, the only people who got it right from the get go.



John
 
Last edited:

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Yes, the trinity or triad concept of God is unscriptural because the pre-human Jesus is the beginning of the creation by God - Revelation 1:5; Revelation 3:14 B.
God is from everlasting - Psalms 90:2 - meaning God had No beginning, so Jesus was Not before the beginning as God was before the beginning.
Before Adam sinned he was on a one-on-one basis with God.
Since we are sinners we do Not have that one-on-one relationship with God.
Since we can Not resurrect oneself or anyone else we need someone who can resurrect us. According to Christian Scripture that is Jesus - Revelation 1:18
Because of Jesus' ransom death is why Jesus is now mediator (go-between) for us - 1 Timothy 2:5-6; Romans 5:19
That intercessor position is temporary until enemy death is No more - Isaiah 25:8
By the end of Jesus' coming 1,000-year governmental rulership over Earth, then righteous mankind will once again be able to have a one-on-one relationship with God.
Forever mankind will then have the return of the Genesis ' tree of life ' for the healing of earth's nations - Revelation 22:2
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
When discussing metaphysics, many people don't understand that whereas in physics (as opposed to metaphysics), you have a referent and something that references it (the word "apple" is the reference for the referent: that red fruit sitting there on the table), in metaphysics you don't have the same duality between reference and referent.
I think I can plead guilty on that one.

The miracle of the Jewish mind is its ability to understand that God's immateriality is not just absent physicality . . . as though that deficiency is minor (kind of an immaterial materiality) but to realize that if there's no materiality, then there's no dualistic relationship between the reference, and the referent, and thus no mediatable space between the two.
I think it is important to specify that the mind you are talking about is not a genetic thing but is a way of thinking that comes from a particular practice which you suggest is the cause, so you are suggesting when you say 'Jewish mind' that the mindset and way of thinking is superior for metaphysical subjects not that you have superior genetics.
The Greeks and the Christians merely use the word "immaterial" as a bandage over a chasm the Jews, before anyone else, and singularly, appreciated as not something that can be handled in such a shallow and muddleheaded way. Jews, miraculously, intuited the genuine issues involved in the distinction between a material, pagan, idol, God, and the actual monotheistic God who is the creator of the physical world.
Its not clear how you intuit that, perhaps because I'm not Jewish; but I gather you feel its very important to believe God creates the physical world and that a material God (aka a referent) could not have done so.
Judaism is completely correct that Jesus cannot be a mediator in the sense that Greek Christianity makes him a mediator. That kind of mediation is pagan, and doesn't even participate in the most magnificent insight given to humanity, through Judaism, that in metaphysics, the trinity of reference, referent, and subject, is a facade, a chimera, and a demonic ruse, generating misunderstanding toward, hatred for, and violence against, the only people who got it right from the get go.
A small number of people view him as a mediator who mediates with people to change their behavior rather than a mediator who adjusts God's view of their situation -- a small number. Would you say that contradicted Judaism? Now it is probably a very small number, like 1 in a million or so; but I have heard this.
 

jeager106

Learning more about Jehovah.
Premium Member
"That kind of mediation is pagan, "

O.P.
Pls explain why it's pagan?
 

Rise

Well-Known Member
In Exodus and Leviticus we see God establish a very specific and elaborate pattern of rituals that are conveying spiritual truth to us.

Nobody could approach the glory of God in the Holy of Holies except the high priest alone, and only then once a year on the day of atonement, and only then carrying with him the blood of the sacrifice to atone for sin.

If this is not a symbolic picture of there being a mediator between fallen man and God, then what would be?
 
Last edited:

John D. Brey

Well-Known Member
Yes, the trinity or triad concept of God is unscriptural because the pre-human Jesus is the beginning of the creation by God - Revelation 1:5; Revelation 3:14 B.
God is from everlasting - Psalms 90:2 - meaning God had No beginning, so Jesus was Not before the beginning as God was before the beginning.
Before Adam sinned he was on a one-on-one basis with God.
Since we are sinners we do Not have that one-on-one relationship with God.
Since we can Not resurrect oneself or anyone else we need someone who can resurrect us. According to Christian Scripture that is Jesus - Revelation 1:18
Because of Jesus' ransom death is why Jesus is now mediator (go-between) for us - 1 Timothy 2:5-6; Romans 5:19
That intercessor position is temporary until enemy death is No more - Isaiah 25:8
By the end of Jesus' coming 1,000-year governmental rulership over Earth, then righteous mankind will once again be able to have a one-on-one relationship with God.
Forever mankind will then have the return of the Genesis ' tree of life ' for the healing of earth's nations - Revelation 22:2

To speak of the "pre-human" Jesus is a foul. What would Jesus have been before he was Jesus? . . . All Jesus could be before he was born, is what you and I are before we are born, genes in the flesh and blood of the human race: sons of Adam. ------To speak of what Jesus was before his birth is the very foul that the Jewish mind doesn't allow to take place. It's a road to false theology, and false understandings of God.

. . . You begin to get back on track when you say that Adam was on a one-on-one relationship with God before his sin. But that would make Adam the first Christ. Which is ok since they say Jesus is the second Adam.

Jesus said death is no more. Anyone who believes in him will never die. . . Ergo, we must already be dead; born dead, such that belief in Jesus is immediate resurrection from the dead, such that the dead (though animated) flesh (that we entered into this living death with) must merely take its course before we experience the reality that occurred the moment we believed in Christ.


John
 

John D. Brey

Well-Known Member
I think it is important to specify that the mind you are talking about is not a genetic thing but is a way of thinking that comes from a particular practice which you suggest is the cause, so you are suggesting when you say 'Jewish mind' that the mindset and way of thinking is superior for metaphysical subjects not that you have superior genetics.

Right. The Jewish mindset is correct. Does that play into genes? Who knows?



John
 

John D. Brey

Well-Known Member
"That kind of mediation is pagan, "

O.P.
Pls explain why it's pagan?

For a mediator to be fair to both parties in the mediation, the mediator would have to be a dukes mixture of both of the things being mediated. A word can mediate for physical things, like apples, because the word itself has physical qualities, like the ink, or the voice. But since nothing can be half-God and half-physical thing, only a pagan mind would be willing to worship a so-called mediator between God and man.


John
 

John D. Brey

Well-Known Member
In Exodus and Leviticus we see God establish a very specific and elaborate pattern of rituals that are conveying spiritual truth to us.

Nobody could approach the glory of God in the Holy of Holies except the high priest alone, and only then on day of atonement, and only then carrying with him the blood of the sacrifice to atone for sin.

If this is not a symbolic picture of there being a mediatior between fallen man and God, then what would be?

Great question.


John
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
To speak of the "pre-human" Jesus is a foul. What would Jesus have been before he was Jesus? . . . All Jesus could be before he was born, is what you and I are before we are born, genes in the flesh and blood of the human race: sons of Adam. ------To speak of what Jesus was before his birth is the very foul that the Jewish mind doesn't allow to take place. It's a road to false theology, and false understandings of God.
. . . You begin to get back on track when you say that Adam was on a one-on-one relationship with God before his sin. But that would make Adam the first Christ. Which is ok since they say Jesus is the second Adam.
Jesus said death is no more. Anyone who believes in him will never die. . . Ergo, we must already be dead; born dead, such that belief in Jesus is immediate resurrection from the dead, such that the dead (though animated) flesh (that we entered into this living death with) must merely take its course before we experience the reality that occurred the moment we believed in Christ.
John

Before Jesus was Jesus, he was the pre-human spirit heavenly Son of God whom 'God sent to Earth' from Heaven to be born as a human.- Revelation 1:5; Revelation 3:14 B.
Because of the resurrection ( Acts of the Apostles 24:15 ) the faithful are considered as living because in the resurrection they can gain everlasting life never to die again.
What does Romans 6:7 mean to you ?
There was No immediate resurrection for the dead Jesus. There was No immediate resurrection for Jesus' dead friend at John 11:39, Nor for king David- Acts of the Apostles 2:34-35
Jesus now has the keys to unlock death for us - Revelation 1:18
During Jesus' coming 1,000-year rulership over Earth, then is Jesus' millennium-long resurrection day for people going all the way back to Abel.- Matthew 23:35
That is why the ' future tense ' is used at Acts of the Apostles 24:15 that there ' is going to be ' a resurrection......
 

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
For a mediator to be fair to both parties in the mediation, the mediator would have to be a dukes mixture of both of the things being mediated. A word can mediate for physical things, like apples, because the word itself has physical qualities, like the ink, or the voice. But since nothing can be half-God and half-physical thing, only a pagan mind would be willing to worship a so-called mediator between God and man.


John
Have you ever actually read the Bible?
 

Rise

Well-Known Member
For a mediator to be fair to both parties in the mediation, the mediator would have to be a dukes mixture of both of the things being mediated.

So the mediator would have to be both human, and God, at the same time? Interesting; Is that not what see described here?
John 1:1-4
Hebrews 2:17-18
 

John D. Brey

Well-Known Member
So the mediator would have to be both human, and God, at the same time? Interesting; Is that not what see described here?
John 1:1-4
Hebrews 2:17-18

I don't necessarily see the idea of a half-god half-man mediator there. I think there are better NT verses to suggest that Jesus is a mediator between God and man. But I would argue that Jesus is not half-God and half-man. I would argue that the Jewish idea is more correct: that there's no actual mediator since God is not something out there requiring mediation.



John
 

Rise

Well-Known Member
I don't necessarily see the idea of a half-god half-man mediator there. I think there are better NT verses to suggest that Jesus is a mediator between God and man. But I would argue that Jesus is not half-God and half-man. I would argue that the Jewish idea is more correct:

You have a misunderstanding of how Jesus is viewed based on scripture. He is both fully God and fully man. He is not half-god and half-man.

We see from scripture that not only was Jesus fully God Himself, lacking nothing about what makes God who He is; but He was also fully man in the sense of experiencing everything as a man would and having a real body born into this world.

If Jesus were only half-god, like some pagan demi-god, that inherently implies some kind of polytheism because it makes Jesus out to be a separate and lesser being to God Himself - but that is not the picture the Bible gives us. Jesus is said to be the one true God Himself but essentially manifested in human form.

that there's no actual mediator since God is not something out there requiring mediation.

Why would God go to such lengths to create a type and pattern of there being a mediator between man and God, through instructions to Moses, if this was not a picture of a higher spiritual principle of someone mediating on our behalf to remove our sin and restore access to God?
 
Last edited:

John D. Brey

Well-Known Member
You have a misunderstanding of how Jesus is viewed based on scripture. He is both fully God and fully man. He is not half-god and half-man. . . We see from scripture that not only was Jesus fully God Himself, lacking nothing about what makes God who He is; but He was also fully man in the sense of experiencing everything as a man would and having a real body born into this world. . . If Jesus were only half-god, like some pagan demi-god, that inherently implies some kind of polytheism because it makes Jesus out to be a separate and lesser being to God Himself - but that is not the picture the Bible gives us. Jesus is said to be the one true God Himself but essentially manifested in human form.

If Jesus is fully man, and fully God, then is God fully man? ----- That's the primary question the first message is interested in. ---- Do you see the problem with saying Jesus is fully man, and fully God, without acknowledging that God is fully man? ----- Jesus would have to be a new and unique hypostasis of God. And that new hypostasis would have to subsume the original God who existed before the creation of man.


John
 
Top