This reply is not directed toward any particular poster in the thread.
From
an article on MSN…
First, the Bible (be it Jewish or Christian) is not a historical document. It is a collection of texts written by different people in different generations, and it is understood as sacred scripture in some traditions for teaching religious truths. A
historical document is an original document used by historians to help them write history. That the Bible is counted as a historical document by OK academic standards indicates that something is off over there.
Second, how does the Bible (Jewish or Christian) help teach the history of the US? Were the 13 colonies under the Kingdom of Israel or Kingdom of Judah? Was the US founded on Pentecost in 33 CE?
Third, how is the Bible (Jewish or Christian) the basis of the legal system of the US? I don’t recall there being anything in it about three branches of government, bicameralism, religious liberty for all citizens, no cruel and unusual punishment, etc.
Fourth, the Bible (Jewish or Christian) is not that necessary for a complete understanding of Western civilization. Western civilization, which I assume by the OK educational system is meant European civilization, is really based on
Greco-Roman civilization and Western Christianity. Considering that historical Western Christianity (that is, Roman Catholicism and later, Classical Protestantism) is arguably much more than the Christian Bible, texts and other sources written or created by Western Christians in Europe would be far more relevant. They would be far more relevant because the Christian Bible requires interpretation, and its interpretation is part of Western Christianity.
All in all, either the OK educational system fails to understand these things, or the OK educational system has individuals in it who want to make their brand of Christianity part of the system.