learner Daniel
Active Member
falling asleep it was a long day
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I've heard that expression hundreds of times, like a litany... "Jesus is fully God" ... and even so, I don't have any idea about what those persons are trying to say with it.I never said, Jesus was claiming to be God the Father. He was claiming to be fully G_d.
...
There is only one God. Jesus has the nature of God.I've heard that expression hundreds of times, like a litany... "Jesus is fully God" ... and even so, I don't have any idea about what those persons are trying to say with it.
Does a "fully God" have a God over him?
John 20:17 Jesus said to her: “Stop clinging to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. But go to my brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father and to my God and your God.’”
Can a "fully God" say something like this:
John 14:28 You heard that I said to you, ‘I am going away and I am coming back to you.’ If you loved me, you would rejoice that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I am.
Yes because he is both fully God and fully Man.I've heard that expression hundreds of times, like a litany... "Jesus is fully God" ... and even so, I don't have any idea about what those persons are trying to say with it.
Does a "fully God" have a God over him?
John 20:17 Jesus said to her: “Stop clinging to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. But go to my brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father and to my God and your God.’”
Can a "fully God" say something like this:
John 14:28 You heard that I said to you, ‘I am going away and I am coming back to you.’ If you loved me, you would rejoice that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I am.
I don't know what you're trying to say:There is only one God. Jesus has the nature of God.
We know that there is rank in the godhead Father, Son and Holy SpiritI've heard that expression hundreds of times, like a litany... "Jesus is fully God" ... and even so, I don't have any idea about what those persons are trying to say with it.
Does a "fully God" have a God over him?
John 20:17 Jesus said to her: “Stop clinging to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. But go to my brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father and to my God and your God.’”
Can a "fully God" say something like this:
John 14:28 You heard that I said to you, ‘I am going away and I am coming back to you.’ If you loved me, you would rejoice that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I am.
I don't know what you mean with that.We know that there is rank in the godhead Father, Son and Holy Spirit
There are multiple threads on this that should be combined.I don't know what you're trying to say:
If there is only one God, is it Jesus or Jesus' God? They can't both be.
I've heard that expression hundreds of times, like a litany... "Jesus is fully God" ... and even so, I don't have any idea about what those persons are trying to say with it.
Does a "fully God" have a God over him?
John 20:17 Jesus said to her: “Stop clinging to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. But go to my brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father and to my God and your God.’”
Can a "fully God" say something like this:
John 14:28 You heard that I said to you, ‘I am going away and I am coming back to you.’ If you loved me, you would rejoice that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I am.
I know very well what Trinitarians and those like them believe. I also know very well the interpretations they make of certain texts that they use to justify their ideas. But a few reminders of simple teachings of Jesus show that such supposed logic of the Trinitarians leads them to erroneous conclusions.Hi Eli G,
It's really as simple as the Father (the only God) was dwelling in that body. The Father is greater than that fleshly body. God can't die. The body he was dwelling in could die.
These others that are saying there is a Trinity have to ignore so many things. For example, they claim the Holy Spirit is another person. But the scripture plainly teaches that God is a Spirit, and that there is only one God, and that there is only one Spirit of God, and that God is holy. And Matthew 1:20 lets us know Mary was with child of the Holy Spirit. That means the Holy Spirit is the Father.
sameIf Jesus talked about his God here:
Rev. 3:12 The one who conquers—I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God, and he will by no means go out from it anymore, and I will write upon him the name of my God and the name of the city of my God, the New Jerusalem that descends out of heaven from my God, and my own new name.
Do you believe in that same God, or in a different one?
Here's the thing. When he worked those miracles, it was the Father dwelling in that body that was working the miracles. The flesh couldn't work miracles. That body was just like our body - weak. But once the Father raised that body up, it was then a glorified spiritual body that couldn't die. Then he said I have all power in heaven and in earth. He ascended and took his seat on the throne of God to rule as God forever.I know very well what Trinitarians and those like them believe. I also know very well the interpretations they make of certain texts that they use to justify their ideas. But a few reminders of simple teachings of Jesus show that such supposed logic of the Trinitarians leads them to erroneous conclusions.
The idea is the following: no matter how complex an argument may seem, if there is a simple teaching directly from Jesus himself that refutes the conclusion of such a complex argument, then a lot of time and energy was wasted in the reasoning, because Jesus already said that the conclusion reached with it is false.
For example: how can it be said that Jesus is Almighty if he himself says that there are things that he cannot do (John 5:19)? Or, how can it be said that Jesus is omniscient if he himself said that there were things that he did not know (Mark 13:32)? Or, how can it be said that he is God if he himself says that there are things that he does not have the authority to do, because they are in the exclusive hands of his Father (Mat. 20:23)? And if he has someone whom he calls GOD, how can one contradict him by saying that he is GOD, instead of that God of whom he himself spoke (John 17:3)?
It is no use wasting time on reasoning that end up contradicting Jesus. One cannot deny Jesus and then say that one is a Christian.
why did he eat fish?Here's the thing. When he worked those miracles, it was the Father dwelling in that body that was working the miracles. The flesh couldn't work miracles. That body was just like our body - weak. But once the Father raised that body up, it was then a glorified spiritual body that couldn't die. Then he said I have all power in heaven and in earth. He ascended and took his seat on the throne of God to rule as God forever.
The Father of Jesus "dwelling" in him DOES NOT mean that the Father was not a different person in heavens.Here's the thing. When he worked those miracles, it was the Father dwelling in that body that was working the miracles. The flesh couldn't work miracles. That body was just like our body - weak. But once the Father raised that body up, it was then a glorified spiritual body that couldn't die. Then he said I have all power in heaven and in earth. He ascended and took his seat on the throne of God to rule as God forever.
Mat. 24:36 says the same thing.That part in the verse of Mark 13:32 you are speaking of is not in some of the manuscripts. "Nor the Son" was an addition.
Jesus and his Father, God, were two different persons before Jesus was born as a human (John 1:2,14,18), two different persons when Jesus was a human (John 17:1; Mat. 26:53), and they are now two different persons, with different names:YHWH said in the Old Testament that he was the God of all flesh. That included the flesh of the Messiah. The Spirit was the God of that flesh. While he was in a fleshly body, that body had to be subject to the Spirit.
I'm not aware of anything in the NT that supports the view that God was present in Jesus, except in the technical sense that the ruler is "present" when his or her envoy is present.It's really as simple as the Father (the only God) was dwelling in that body. The Father is greater than that fleshly body. God can't die. The body he was dwelling in could die.
I agree that there is no "trinity" in the NT.These others that are saying there is a Trinity have to ignore so many things. For example, they claim the Holy Spirit is another person. But the scripture plainly teaches that God is a Spirit, and that there is only one God, and that there is only one Spirit of God, and that God is holy.
Of the five NT versions of Jesus, only those of Matthew and Luke are 'conceived of the Holy Ghost'. Mark's is an ordinary Jewish male until his baptism by JtB, at which point the heavens open and the Jewish God adopts him as [his] son (as [he] had earlier adopted David as [his] son in Psalm 2:7, a view directly supported in Acts 13:33. However, the Jesus of Paul and the Jesus of John each have the Gnostic qualities of having pre-existed in heaven with God, and (regardless of what Genesis says) created the material universe; but how each came to have human form is only hinted at by the claim each is descended from David. (As you know, Mark's Jesus says you don't need to be descended from David, but the other four disagree.)And Matthew 1:20 lets us know Mary was with child of the Holy Spirit. That means the Holy Spirit is the Father.
The Messiah didn't exist except in the mind and plans of God until YHWH took on flesh. He was made of a woman and made under (or during the time of) the law. Galatians 4:4The Father of Jesus "dwelling" in him DOES NOT mean that the Father was not a different person in heavens.
Mat. 7:11 Therefore, if you, although being wicked, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more so will your Father who is in the heavens give good things to those asking him!
... 10:32 “Everyone, then, who acknowledges me before men, I will also acknowledge him before my Father who is in the heavens. 33 But whoever disowns me before men, I will also disown him before my Father who is in the heavens.
Mat. 24:36 says the same thing.
Jesus and his Father, God, were two different persons before Jesus was born as a human (John 1:2,14,18), two different persons when Jesus was a human (John 17:1; Mat. 26:53), and they are now two different persons, with different names:
Rev. 3:12 The one who conquers—I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God, and he will by no means go out from it anymore, and I will write upon him the name of my God and the name of the city of my God, the New Jerusalem that descends out of heaven from my God, and my own new name.
So, in the temple of heaven one God is worshipped, the God of whom Jesus is high priest.
Heb. 5:5 So, too, the Christ did not glorify himself by becoming a high priest, but was glorified by the One who said to him: “You are my son; today I have become your father.”
That is not what Jesus said about himself.The Messiah didn't exist except in the mind and plans of God until YHWH took on flesh. ...
I agree that there is no "trinity" in the NT.I'm not aware of anything in the NT that supports the view that God was present in Jesus, except in the technical sense that the ruler is "present" when his or her envoy is present.
There are five versions of Jesus in the NT (Paul's and the four gospels'). Each of the five denies he's God and none of the five ever claims to be God. If you'd like to read some of the relevant quotes, I set them out in this earlier thread >Jesus Failed Right?<.
QUOTE="TrueBeliever37, post: 8798712, member: 56659"]
These others that are saying there is a Trinity have to ignore so many things. For example, they claim the Holy Spirit is another person. But the scripture plainly teaches that God is a Spirit, and that there is only one God, and that there is only one Spirit of God, and that God is holy.
What about the rest of what I said? Why just ignore it?