Desert Snake
Veteran Member
'Son of God', is how *we view 'Jesus'. Part of the problem here is thinking Jesus is a man like us who was
Deified' by the church. This is incorrect. Tradition at that time for 'gentiles' was man focused when referencing deities. It may even have been difficult to have a 'god' who wasn't just like us for some in the early church. This is why we get the "emphasis" on the 'man' aspects in much of church tradition.
this is a format that might help to explain things.
-"Jesus", Deity in man form. 'Man' in all respects, Deity by necessity.
(sorry modern 'Christian clerics etc who maintain a non=theistic version of xinity, it aint real), (ie ain't historical)
-Early church /some/ can't handle this idea. Outside of understanding, culture, zeitgeist, previous belief etc. So they "manify" Jesus somewhat. Being honest chaps in general, they still maintain a 'Deific' Jesus, but.....
-Justify this deific nature with the Hebraic 'God', //the father, JHVH; they do this by sort of '''separating''' the natures. Hence the 'trinity doctrine, technically pretty sound but in common thought and possibly even church teaching, sort of confusing.
-The 'church', increasingly becomes more 'secular'. In accordance with secular belief, 'Jesus' (being a man), must not be a Deity! so, His 'role' becomes increasingly a 'middleman' to the 'proposed' god of Judaism.//Judaism actually views Deity /God differently from Xianity
- continuing on. When 'looking' at church history, church academics assume they (the church) 'created' a deific Jesus, because it came up with the trinity Doctrine.
*the followers. It's more of a description. Jesus says He is the only way anyone can know the father, this indicates more than a 'son' role.
Deified' by the church. This is incorrect. Tradition at that time for 'gentiles' was man focused when referencing deities. It may even have been difficult to have a 'god' who wasn't just like us for some in the early church. This is why we get the "emphasis" on the 'man' aspects in much of church tradition.
this is a format that might help to explain things.
-"Jesus", Deity in man form. 'Man' in all respects, Deity by necessity.
(sorry modern 'Christian clerics etc who maintain a non=theistic version of xinity, it aint real), (ie ain't historical)
-Early church /some/ can't handle this idea. Outside of understanding, culture, zeitgeist, previous belief etc. So they "manify" Jesus somewhat. Being honest chaps in general, they still maintain a 'Deific' Jesus, but.....
-Justify this deific nature with the Hebraic 'God', //the father, JHVH; they do this by sort of '''separating''' the natures. Hence the 'trinity doctrine, technically pretty sound but in common thought and possibly even church teaching, sort of confusing.
-The 'church', increasingly becomes more 'secular'. In accordance with secular belief, 'Jesus' (being a man), must not be a Deity! so, His 'role' becomes increasingly a 'middleman' to the 'proposed' god of Judaism.//Judaism actually views Deity /God differently from Xianity
- continuing on. When 'looking' at church history, church academics assume they (the church) 'created' a deific Jesus, because it came up with the trinity Doctrine.
*the followers. It's more of a description. Jesus says He is the only way anyone can know the father, this indicates more than a 'son' role.
Last edited: