• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Tyre prophecy

1robin

Christian/Baptist
On the contrary, you have not provided any good arguments against my post 3639, at http://www.religiousforums.com/foru...le-rational-proof-god-exists-existed-364.html, which shows that an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent, and perfect God could not have free will, and my post 3640 on the same page, which reasonably proves that God does not provide reasonable evidence to everyone who knows enough about the Bible to be accountable, and my post 3641 on the following page, which shows that it is plausible that God is an imposter.
Your puling percentages out of the air is absolutely arbitrary and contrived. I have not seen any evidence you have been educated in probability or statistics but even the combined might of all MIT professors could never produce a statistically reliable chance that the biblical God exists. Even historical calculus can't do it and it is a stretch from the word go.

I provided the thread, and post numbers for you, and you need to reply to those posts. We have much more to discuss about those issues. They are far too complex to conclude with the relatively few discussions that we have had about them.
I will give you a choice. You want a response to that post or a new thread about prophecy?



First of all, this thread is about the Tyre prophecy, which means that few people would come here who are not interested in the Tyre prophecy. Second, surely a number of people other than you and me would be interested in discussing, or reading about messianic prophecies. As you know, there are a number of Jews at this forum. Surely some of them would be interested in discussing, or reading about messianic prophecies, not to mention a number of skeptics. Third, surely there are a number of people at this forum who know a lot of things about messianic prophecies that I do not know, which would obviously improve the quality, and usefulness of a new thread on messianic prophecies. Fourth, I suspect that you know that if you started a new thread on messianic prophecies, I would have more support from other people than you would, and that that would make it more difficult for you than would be the case if we limited discussions about messianic prophecies to this thread on the Tyre prophecy. I also suspect that you do not know anywhere near as much about Bible prophecy as you think you do. Fifth, the more that people read my posts, the more opportunities I have to influence them, so it would not be sensible for me to limit my comments about messianic prophecies to this thread. The same would go for you if you want to influence people.

You have promoted Bible prophecy in general a number of times at this forum, and messianic prophecies in particular. Do you wish to discuss Bible prophecy anymore? If so, please start a new thread. I started this thread to discuss only the Tyre prophecy. We are not getting anywhere having discussions in this thread since probably no one other than you and I visit this thread.

Just as certainly as I know you want a new thread so you might get some help from Jews, etc...... I was trying to avoid it. I did not want to waste a lot of time countering Jewish claims about messianic prophecies applying to the nation of Israel. I regard that claim as patently absurd but Jews are usually well prepared and there exists much info which I would have to weed through. I was hoping to avoid what your hoping to get. But that is not really justifiable so take your pick. The above post or the new thread.
 

Agnostic75

Well-Known Member
1robin said:
The above post or the new thread.

I mentioned three posts in the other thread. I would prefer discussing all three of them at length, one at a time, starting with the first one.
 
Last edited:

Agnostic75

Well-Known Member
1robin said:
So you did. Alright I will get to them.

That is fine, but don't bother if you are not willing to discuss all of them at great length, for many months like you have done in some threads. Based upon some of my past experiences with you, I suspect that if we made a few more posts regarding the first topic that I mentioned, you would claim that I am being repetitive, and did not make any reasonable arguments, and refuse to reply to any more of my posts about that topic. If that happened, then I would refuse to discuss any other topic with you.
 
Last edited:
Top