1nharmony
A Coco-Nut
Chief Seattle of the Suquamish tribe (NW USA) is credited with this quote:
"Whatever befalls the earth befalls the sons of the earth. If men spit upon the ground, they spit upon themselves.
This we know: The earth does not belong to man; man belongs to the earth. This we know.
All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected.
Whatever befalls the earth befalls the sons of the earth.
Man did not weave the web of life: he is merely a strand in it.
Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself."
This message came to mind recently as I began reading the February issue of National Geographic. Society President John Fahey wrote this in the introduction:
"There is inevitable tension in the relationship between human aspirations and the natural world. Our future depends on how well we manage that relationship."
President Fahey's comment seems somewhat trite to me. A person in his position, I would think, obviously has an awareness of the connection between man and nature. Native Americans had this awareness for centuries before the Europeans arrived, so I'm finding this "revelation" of Fahey's rather ironic, while also wondering why he describes it using the word "tension". I think the Indian generally found the relationship to be harmonious. Is it that the "white man" (using this term to denote any of us today who are disconnected from nature) is so removed from nature that he can do nothing more than observe the results of his destruction rather than foresee the negative impact?
"Whatever befalls the earth befalls the sons of the earth. If men spit upon the ground, they spit upon themselves.
This we know: The earth does not belong to man; man belongs to the earth. This we know.
All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected.
Whatever befalls the earth befalls the sons of the earth.
Man did not weave the web of life: he is merely a strand in it.
Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself."
This message came to mind recently as I began reading the February issue of National Geographic. Society President John Fahey wrote this in the introduction:
"There is inevitable tension in the relationship between human aspirations and the natural world. Our future depends on how well we manage that relationship."
President Fahey's comment seems somewhat trite to me. A person in his position, I would think, obviously has an awareness of the connection between man and nature. Native Americans had this awareness for centuries before the Europeans arrived, so I'm finding this "revelation" of Fahey's rather ironic, while also wondering why he describes it using the word "tension". I think the Indian generally found the relationship to be harmonious. Is it that the "white man" (using this term to denote any of us today who are disconnected from nature) is so removed from nature that he can do nothing more than observe the results of his destruction rather than foresee the negative impact?