• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Whores of Oblivion And Ignorance ?

RKBA-who-do-you-trust.jpg
Here is a typical example by national leaders why you have no understanding of what methods they wanted to us to run a regime state in building the utopian dream
The Whores of Oblivion

I am sick to death of the fake wannabee fascist ideologist leaving at the back of my house so I am going to say what I need to say the way I was taught during my political history lectures, the whole concept of national socialism is national politics which means there is not immigration policies except for neighbouring countries as is Austria to Germany, the twat expecting me to want a fascist hail behind the house of me is talking of coined term by the man who was and is the most renowned leader of the third Reich, it was his national socialist teachings that saw the end of parliamentary policies in Germany to make way for a government ran through the Reichstag, if it is one thing the national socialist government did like and that was the rise of any political party except their own, which effectively means that unlike British parliamentary politics whose government host the right for more than one political party to have their say (ie) a conservative party, a Labour party, a liberal party, a socialist party, a communist party, a green party (ect) all of which have the right to voters unlike the national socialist which is an elective dictatorship, should England have had an elective dictatorship these fake wannnabee immigrant fascist living behind me would not have the freedom of choice he, she or myself have today, one of the most effective methods the fascist party of 1930s to 1940s had was the refusal right of any immigration, so (WTF) are you talking about trying to be all fascist immigrant with me for? In addition to the misconceptions of what a fascist national socialist regime would be like? without a doubt it leads to a police state which means only the unformed forces would be allowed to have fire arms, there would be a total and immediate control of socialist entertainment hence censorship of all social environment programs, there would be an exceptionally strong restriction for noise pollution so your nights of party party would be out the window, then there would be an immediate sifting system for population control and mixed race integration would totally cease at the price of human sterilization, there would be no marijuana trafficking and all drugs would be controlled by pharmaceutical authorizations alone, there would be no third world issues because if the country was not deemed suited to economical stability present and future tenths they would wipe it out by genocide, also the fascist hate of nomadic cultures are infamous, no slave would be kept because the keeping of slave would lead to a dilution of the Utopian ideals (not that I am into slavery because I am against it) and should your offspring be born ill favoured (ie) disabled in any way? they would hence be sterilised and if your produce more than one disabled child you would be sterilized, in addition to this should any person be seen not able to suite the national curriculum for whatever reasons it would be a duration of time before they a shut way until passed and furthermore to make you look an unct , what you don’t realise is that shouting that political hail is from a man who ran a government, one of the reasons the fascist of Germany came to power so easily is because they relied on system of informants of patriots sworn to the German fascist ideal to inform on people. on the subject of informing to the police you ‘you’ve got the ownership there never mind what I say, do I really need to carry on why you a wanntebee hypocrites fascist have no freaken idea you newly arrived oblivious halfwit , do you want me to carry on where your desire for the Utopian ideal will leave you much less me? For a better understanding why I don’t want your need to be hailed you want to be fascist immigrant half wit? Consider this analogy or metaphoric equation, like the Catholic I put absolute power in the church and the powers greater than man whereas the protestant dose not, in sort I don’t believe in poetics at all and put religion though unconventional above all political ideologies, so what does that mean? For the hundredth time? God its like talking to a plank of would. It means I don’t want to hail politics nor will need to be hailed by politics effectively not caring for any power black or white
C A Forbes


( Quote :Fredrick Nietzsche ''One should aware before venturing into the unknown'')
 
Last edited:

McBell

Unbound
FYI:
Most people will not be able to read your big wall of text.

You might want to implement a style of writing that includes paragraphs.

Just saying....
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
Well, I did try. Then I got to the swearing and insults; then the grammar and spelling and enough was enough.

I assume you are pro-guns?? It wasn't totally clear.
 

Ultimatum

Classical Liberal
John Patrick Bedell was an American.
Jeremy Corbyn is an Englishman.

Why do you still live in America?
 

Timothy Bryce

Active Member

That silly picture is no more valid than the opinions of Glenn Beck.

Are there more credible, modern politicians who have succeeded in passing and enforcing gun control legislation for the purpose of making society a better place?

Are/were they the political leaders of countries that are compatible with today's USA society?

The answer to both questions is yes.

Examine Australia's former Prime Minister John Howard's implemented legislation and explain to me how ANY of the men in that picture are more relevant to the circumstances in the USA.

I think you'll be appalled at your own ignorance.
 

Druac

Devout Atheist
To answer the question in the meme...None of the above. I didn't bother reading the wall of text.
 

Underhill

Well-Known Member
I love the grouping. Hitler, Stalin, Amin...exterminated masses of people Lenin okay... he fits the bill. Castro? I get he is a communist, but Castro isn't in their league... Fought a bloody Gorilla war, but was not a mass slaughterer of large numbers of people. But a guy a lot of people love to hate.

Then Obama who is guilty of a health care plan that may be a bit pricey and continuing his predecessors foreign policy. Yeah, okay.

The whole premise is rubbish though. The founding fathers were in a completely different situation than what we face today. They had just started a new government that most of the world thought would devolve into just another monarchy or fall into anarchy. They weren't seeing us an established nation under no real threat from anyone, with weapons the likes of which are available today. It's like using copyright rules from the 1920's as your gospel when looking at internet policy. Or determining DOT policy by reading up on how they handled traffic in 1850.

Like guns or hate them, the founding fathers are completely irrelevant to much of anything these days.
 
Top