• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The witchhunt continues...

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
I think the claim that "castrating minors saves lives" is extraordinary. It goes against all common sense and experience. It ignores long term consequences. I'm not saying that it's absolutely not true. But it IS an extraordinary claim.
Are you going to claim that the medical community recommends castrating minors? Because that would be an extraordinary claim. Do you have any evidence of any medically endorsed castrations of a minor?
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
What do you think the scientific community would say about that?
Science is all about questioning conclusions, re-examining evidence, and questioning authority in general. I think true scientists would welcome the skepticism.

What restrictions on minors are you thinking about? And what does the scientific community say about those restrictions?

I don't want to quibble over details, but younger people are not allowed to vote, or drive, or drink. I would guess that neurologists would agree that those are good laws.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
I don't want to quibble over details, but younger people are not allowed to vote, or drive, or drink. I would guess that neurologists would agree that those are good laws.
Assuming neurologists do agree that those are good laws, do you agree with the neurologist on those things?
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Assuming neurologists do agree that those are good laws, do you agree with the neurologist on those things?
I do indeed. For many of the same reasons that lead me to think that young brains and minds are NOT mature enough to decide that they want to have their bodies maimed.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
That's exactly what I've been talking about for the last zillion posts. That's the topic I'm discussing. ***mod edit***
No, I asked you. Do you have any evidence of any medically endorsed castrations of minors? I am not even going to ask you to produce that evidence, but just tell me, have you seen any? Do you really believe that the medical community is castrating minor?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Critical thinking is important, but my personal opinion is that to think it suddenly makes us top experts in the field with our own mind, is kind of a whole misapplication of it.
I agree. That's not what I'm suggesting.

But I DO think we can recognize extraordinary claims and demand extraordinary evidence.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
No, I asked you. Do you have any evidence of any medically endorsed castrations of minors? I am not even going to ask you to produce that evidence, but just tell me, have you seen any? Do you really believe that the medical community is castrating minor?
Yes, yes, and yes.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
I do indeed. For many of the same reasons that lead me to think that young brains and minds are NOT mature enough to decide that they want to have their bodies maimed.
Great, so you do agree with medical experts, at least sometimes.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Yet you believe a God exists while you know many reject these ideas, so you are on the other side of that. Yet you don't feel any compassion for those who you judge live a lie? What makes you so absolutely correct that you are beyond error and can judge others?

Is it love when you accuse others of living a lie? It would be you living a lie if you resisted natural impulses. We are aware of stories of conservatives who were gay, but worked very hard to suppress this impulse to a degree it led to self-destructive actions.
I'm not sure where your logic connects here.

I have complete compassion for my children but does compassion translate into letting them believe a lie or join in a lie?

Certainly I show compassion. I am against transitioning because of compassion. I want them to get help because of compassion. And one could say that love compels one not close their eyes and mouth when a lie is being propagated.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
I have to be amused by you. I'm not your minion. I've provided the links, mostly I think you've ignored them.
You did make am accusation, however, and as you lack supporting evidence and will furnish none then there is no reason to believe your accusation is true. It's a claim that came from your moniker's butt.
If I recall correctly (but I might be remembering a different poster), you didn't like the links because some of the authors were advocates? When I asked you to speak to the factual claims, I got crickets.
That would be someone else.
It goes against all common sense and experience.
So does quantum physics. Ditto for the fundamental incompatibility of Newtonian Gravity and Einstein Relativity.
Common sense isn't really a thing anyways.
It ignores long term consequences.
No. Like all other medical procedures it balances risks versus benefits. In my personal experience, transitioning is the most closely scrutinized and guided procedure I've ever went through. Not even my last knee surgery got any sort of questioning or therapy or guidance even though it was high risk for long term failure (and it did). Given my age at the time and already having three surgeries to that knee he should have declined me as being a poor candidate for surgery. But it happened anyways.
Hormone treatment though I had to buy them online because the normal means of getting them was taking forever and unnecessarily long, partly due to a very limited number of treatment providers in rural Indiana, but mostly because of a med clinic advance practice nurse who diagnosed me with psychotic disorded NOS, meaning that had to be ruled out as a cause of gender dysphoria, evaluated amd reexamined and ultimately struck from my record.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
I think that is an extraordinary claim.

And I don't believe it for a second.
I tried looking it up. Not a single reputable source could confirm this being the case. Indeed it seemed to be something condemned by the actual medical community at large.

Though my search did come up with a lot of results for chemical castration being used as a punishment for sex crimes against children. Perhaps that’s where the confusion came from? :shrug:
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Makes me happy? What kind of an answer was that?

You wrote, "When someone says she, an XX, wants me to participate in her declaring she is an XY - she is asking me to join her in a lie" and I replied, "It's you misrepresenting reality, not her. Her truth includes that she has XY chromosomes. Ask her."

You haven't tried to defend your use of the word lie. You ignored my rebuttal to your claim and repeated the scurrilous charge.

Others have already commented on your reply above, and I agree.

I expressed it very clearly. Others agree with my reply.

And you and I have discussed my objections to what is meant by love to the church here, and you exemplify nicely why that is an inadequate model for love:

You: "we can spread the love that the message of Jesus brings."
Me: "That's not love as I use the word. Christians say that God is love, but its actions are seen as immoral from a humanist perspective. The love of God includes damnation. Love in Christianity includes blood sacrifice. I like the "message of love" that humanism embodies better. Love is about making other lives better."

That is your viewpoint and a point that I have commented so very often. If you would like to change the subject of XX being XY in ones mind to love and what love really is... could you open another post and tag me?
This is why I am an antitheist. I object to people with bigoted views teaching the hatreds of this religion to susceptible minds. That's why I wrote this post - to underscore the moral failings of what is going on in churches and the poverty of ideas like love and truth (or lie) in that culture.

So, no, I guess I don't agree to disagree if that means that's the end of it. I agree to go on opposing that institution and the vectors of its destructive doctrine.

This makes no sense at all. Why would what "people do" make a difference on what you believe? We aren't preaching "people" - we are sharing and teaching about "Jesus". Besides that, yes, there are religious people who may have a bigoted attitude but humanists can be that way too. Isn't that hypocritical? Pointing the finger when your own camp does it too?
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
I'm not sure where your logic connects here.

I have complete compassion for my children but does compassion translate into letting them believe a lie or join in a lie?
It is your insistence that those who have gender identity challenges are lying that is where you are not connecting the logic. It is your judgment that is immoral and flawed. Heck, it even goes against what Jesus taught about NOT judging others for who they are. I would say those who have gender identity challenges are living the truth if they are being honest with themselves. But you as a Christian who ignores what Jesus taught? Who is living the lie?

What was that parable about a plank in your eye?

Seriously, what is your level of expertise about gender identity challenges? I have none. A friend of mine has his phd in gender identity psychology, and we have had some talks about this. Another friend has a daughter that at 20 was not happy and wanted to get hormone therapy to transition. Now I have no expertise about this issue and I have no personal perspective as a heterosexual male. I had mixed feelings about her transition, and was not sure why she wanted to do this. She has been doing therapy for about a decade now and is much happier in life. So, is it up to me and you to decide what makes Cass happy, or is it none of our business? We can have our reaction to this, but what right do we have to say anything? You fall back on your religion, but I have only myself, so my integrity, my compassion, my morals. I have nowhere to hide. So I show Cass support, and feel happy that he has found happiness. This is my obligation as a human being.
Certainly I show compassion. I am against transitioning because of compassion.
No, you lack compassion because you can't see human beings for who they are because you look at everything through the filter of your religious dogma. It taints any chance you have to be truly compassionate, and not be judgmental. You defer your judgment to your dogma, as if you have no option but to judge trans people. That is an excuse. It's the "I was just following orders" excuse that immoral people try to hide behind.
I want them to get help because of compassion. And one could say that love compels one not close their eyes and mouth when a lie is being propagated.
This is how religion suffocates the spirit. The dogma weighs so heavily that the soul can't be free to live and feel what is natural. Such believers are little more than empty agents for religion, and it is no wonder they confuse judgment and intolerance for love and compassion.
 
Last edited:

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Great, so you do agree with medical experts, at least sometimes.

Not what I said. I said they're doing it, I did not say I agreed.

But of course, sometimes I agree with the medical community, I just don't do it without thinking about it.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
I think that is an extraordinary claim.

And I don't believe it for a second.

Is this going to be a LMGTFY moment? If so, how many links will convince you that I'm correct?

(But I have to say, if you have not heard this, you really ought to do just a little smidgeon of research yourself, wouldn't you say?)
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
I tried looking it up. Not a single reputable source could confirm this being the case. Indeed it seemed to be something condemned by the actual medical community at large.

Though my search did come up with a lot of results for chemical castration being used as a punishment for sex crimes against children. Perhaps that’s where the confusion came from? :shrug:

What would you call surgeries that involve removal of genitalia?
 
Top