• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

There Have Been 144 Major Earthquakes in the Last Week.

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
So why are you so sure it's NOW?

It is calculated from the prophesies in Daniel. Jesus showed in his prophecy pointing to the conclusion of the system of things, that Jerusalem would be “trampled on by the nations, until the appointed times of the nations” were fulfilled. (Luke 21:24) So, the Gentile governments, represented by wild beasts in the Bible, would ‘trample’ on the right of God’s Kingdom to direct human affairs until it was time for God's Kingdom to rule the world. We believe that time is coming soon.

See, this is the thing I find most troubling about Rapture style eschatology. You guys are set up to believe any potential solution to global problems, let alone world peace, is actually bad! What sort of chance does that give us?

Who said anything about a rapture? :shrug: It isn't that we are set up to believe any potential solution to global problems will fail...all we have to do is look at man's track record in this regard. Failure is written all over everything. If humans could solve the problems, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Its because of their abject failures that mankind continues to suffer....man's inhumanity to man has dominated his thinking since time immemorial. Man cannot solve the problem because man IS the problem. We have proven beyond a shadow of doubt that we cannot rule ourselves successfully, independent of God.

We could end poverty and starvation tomorrow if we would just all share what we have, but the money hungry commercial system can't.....NO...won't do it. They would throw good food away rather than share it with the poor. No one in this world should be too poor to get medicine, food and shelter and no child should go to bed insecure in their surroundings...and yet that is what is going on every day in our own neighborhoods and theirs. Parents are sleeping in their cars with their children even in wealthy nations. People live on the streets in tent cities whilst the general population tries to ignore them.

But hang on, wasn't that the entire point of the OP?

The point of the OP was to highlight the fact that we don't always know what's happening in the world unless the media are instructed to broadcast it. Do great earthquakes only make the news when there is great loss of life or substantial damage to property? What else don't we know? And when we only hear bad news, night after night, any wonder there is an epidemic of depression!

This world system is toxic and it needs to go....we believe it soon will.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
It is calculated from the prophesies in Daniel. Jesus showed in his prophecy pointing to the conclusion of the system of things, that Jerusalem would be “trampled on by the nations, until the appointed times of the nations” were fulfilled. (Luke 21:24) So, the Gentile governments, represented by wild beasts in the Bible, would ‘trample’ on the right of God’s Kingdom to direct human affairs until it was time for God's Kingdom to rule the world. We believe that time is coming soon.
That's my point. Every previous claim of an imminent Apocalypse had a calculation they were just as sure of, and they ended up being wrong.
Who said anything about a rapture? :shrug: It isn't that we are set up to believe any potential solution to global problems will fail...all we have to do is look at man's track record in this regard. Failure is written all over everything. If humans could solve the problems, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Its because of their abject failures that mankind continues to suffer....man's inhumanity to man has dominated his thinking since time immemorial. Man cannot solve the problem because man IS the problem. We have proven beyond a shadow of doubt that we cannot rule ourselves successfully, independent of God.

We could end poverty and starvation tomorrow if we would just all share what we have, but the money hungry commercial system can't.....NO...won't do it. They would throw good food away rather than share it with the poor. No one in this world should be too poor to get medicine, food and shelter and no child should go to bed insecure in their surroundings...and yet that is what is going on every day in our own neighborhoods and theirs. Parents are sleeping in their cars with their children even in wealthy nations. People live on the streets in tent cities whilst the general population tries to ignore them.
I think you're missing my point
The point of the OP was to highlight the fact that we don't always know what's happening in the world unless the media are instructed to broadcast it. Do great earthquakes only make the news when there is great loss of life or substantial damage to property? What else don't we know? And when we only hear bad news, night after night, any wonder there is an epidemic of depression!

This world system is toxic and it needs to go....we believe it soon will.
So what, you want the news to report on every minor earthquake? The news media is a business. They report on what people are interested in. It's a problematic system but there's hardly anything sinister about it.
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
That's my point. Every previous claim of an imminent Apocalypse had a calculation they were just as sure of, and they ended up being wrong.

We can't predict the day or hour as Jesus said....but the times are indicated by the sign.....why do you think he gave one?

I think you're missing my point

Was I? Can you be more specific then?

So what, you want the news to report on every minor earthquake? The news media is a business. They report on what people are interested in. It's a problematic system but there's hardly anything sinister about it.

Not sinister? You identify as "Catholic" so do you have any respect for the Bible?

If you do then at 2 Corinthians 4:3-4 St Paul says....."And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing. 4 In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God." (NRSVCE) Who is the god of this world?

The apostle John answers....."We know that we are God’s children, and that the whole world lies under the power of the evil one."

What part of this world is NOT under the devil's power? How much more sinister would you like it to be? :eek: His stamp is on everything.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
We can't predict the day or hour as Jesus said....but the times are indicated by the sign.....why do you think he gave one?
And again, that's what all the previous, wrong, predictions thought. What's different this time?
Was I? Can you be more specific then?
I think I was pretty clear initially. I'm not sure how else to explain it. I'll have a think
Not sinister? You identify as "Catholic" so do you have any respect for the Bible?

If you do then at 2 Corinthians 4:3-4 St Paul says....."And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing. 4 In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God." (NRSVCE) Who is the god of this world?

The apostle John answers....."We know that we are God’s children, and that the whole world lies under the power of the evil one."

What part of this world is NOT under the devil's power? How much more sinister would you like it to be? :eek: His stamp is on everything.
Sorry, I just don't think everything is as bad as all that. And I'm suicidal!
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
And again, that's what all the previous, wrong, predictions thought. What's different this time?I think I was pretty clear initially. I'm not sure how else to explain it. I'll have a thinkSorry, I just don't think everything is as bad as all that. And I'm suicidal!
Here's something to consider: the line of world powers, of which the last one, an "eighth king", would remain "a short while." @Deeje, I'm signing off....maybe you can explain it in my stead?

Goodnight to both of you.
 

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
"New Jerusalem" has nothing to do with the old city of Jerusalem, which was a prototype, just as the temple was, picturing heavenly things.

Yes I have not said it does :)

"The Law of God is also described as the Holy City, the New Jerusalem. It is evident that the New Jerusalem which descends from heaven is not a city of stone, mortar, bricks, earth and wood. It is the Law of God which descends from heaven and is called new, for it is clear that the Jerusalem which is of stone and earth does not descend from heaven, and that it is not renewed; but that which is renewed is the Law of God." Abdu'l-Baha : Some Answered Questions

If there is an outward material fulfillment as well then Jerusalem means 'City of Peace' or 'Abode of Peace'.

That City is now Haifa and Akka - In the Future this will be one Great City and "The descent of the New Jerusalem is the heavenly religion which secures the prosperity of the human world and is the effulgence of the illumination of the realm of God."

We see nothing applying to literal Israel not physically or geographically....
"New Jerusalem" is seen coming down from heaven with Jesus and his "bride" of co-rulers. These will rule redeemed "mankind" forever removing the cause of all suffering and death.....sin.

Revelation 21-1-4....
"And I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the former heaven and the former earth had passed away, and the sea is no more. 2 I also saw the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God and prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. 3 With that I heard a loud voice from the throne say: “Look! The tent of God is with mankind, and he will reside with them, and they will be his people. And God himself will be with them. 4 And he will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore. The former things have passed away.”

Then there is this passage that has now been be fulfilled;

Isaiah 35:2"it will burst into bloom; it will rejoice greatly and shout for joy. The glory of Lebanon will be given to it, the splendor of Carmel and Sharon; they will see the glory of the LORD, the splendor of our God."

This can go on for quite some time you know, My great JW mate and I have been at it for 30 years. :)

That a fulfilled prophecy can be given with each passage you quote, it must raise a few questions!

Regards Tony
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
And again, that's what all the previous, wrong, predictions thought. What's different this time?

Its no different for JW's. 1914 has featured in our understanding from the start...we just didn't see that it was the beginning....not the end of the "last days" of this present system. Our understanding increased as time went on, just as it does in science. The calculation taken from the book of Daniel (his prophesies all pertain to "the time of the end") take us to the end of the "Gentile times" (or the Gentile domination of God's people), which is calculated to have run from 607 BCE for 2,520 years, ending in 1914 CE.

Then the heavens were cleansed, and the devil and his demons were cast down to the earth...
Revelation 12:7-12 says about that....

"And war broke out in heaven: Miʹcha·el and his angels battled with the dragon, and the dragon and its angels battled 8 but they did not prevail, nor was a place found for them any longer in heaven. 9 So down the great dragon was hurled, the original serpent, the one called Devil and Satan, who is misleading the entire inhabited earth; he was hurled down to the earth, and his angels were hurled down with him. 10 I heard a loud voice in heaven say:

“Now have come to pass the salvation and the power and the Kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ, because the accuser of our brothers has been hurled down, who accuses them day and night before our God! 11 And they conquered him because of the blood of the Lamb and because of the word of their witnessing, and they did not love their souls even in the face of death. 12 On this account be glad, you heavens and you who reside in them! Woe for the earth and for the sea, because the Devil has come down to you, having great anger, knowing that he has a short period of time.”


We believe that the troubles we see on earth right now are the result of the devil concentrating his efforts on humankind, trying to load us all up with one problem after another, just like he did with Job.

Sorry, I just don't think everything is as bad as all that. And I'm suicidal!

I'm sorry to hear that, but I can tell you that better days are ahead when the Kingdom "comes" and we finally get to see God's will done "on earth as it is in heaven". Isn't that what Jesus taught us to pray for?
 

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
It is calculated from the prophesies in Daniel. Jesus showed in his prophecy pointing to the conclusion of the system of things, that Jerusalem would be “trampled on by the nations, until the appointed times of the nations” were fulfilled. (Luke 21:24) So, the Gentile governments, represented by wild beasts in the Bible, would ‘trample’ on the right of God’s Kingdom to direct human affairs until it was time for God's Kingdom to rule the world. We believe that time is coming soon.

The original calculations that started the SDA Movement to which started the JW Movement was the BC457 starting point that one can use to prove Christ from Daniel. Then if we use the 2300 years also mentioned in Daniel we come to 1844 via this sum.

2300 - 457 + 1 (as no year zero) = 1844.

AD1844 was the year, but the day and hour were not known, people still had to watch and be ready.

Now AD1844 is also AH1260 and that now ties into the Message of Muhammad as One of the 2 Witnesses of Revelation the other being Ali. That Faith lasting 1260 years. It did when the Bab (Gate) brought the New Jerusalem to prepare the way for the "Glory of God", the name you will find in Prophecy all the way through the Bible.

Quite amazing actually :)

Regards Tony
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
Its no different for JW's. 1914 has featured in our understanding from the start...
1914 wasn't5 the first time such predictions were made
We believe that the troubles we see on earth right now are the result of the devil concentrating his efforts on humankind, trying to load us all up with one problem after another, just like he did with Job.
Quite. Which, as I said, is what bothers me about these sorts of theologies. You're self defeating. Anything bad? Proof the devil is acting against us. Anything good? Proof that the devil is tricking us and acting against us. It's a no win dilemma.
I'm sorry to hear that, but I can tell you that better days are ahead when the Kingdom "comes" and we finally get to see God's will done "on earth as it is in heaven". Isn't that what Jesus taught us to pray for?
I appreciate your kind thoughts
 

Deeje

Avid Bible Student
Premium Member
1914 wasn't5 the first time such predictions were made

In the late 1800's things were very new and exciting, but there was so much still to learn. In those early days it was easy to go a bit overboard, but with time and some 'growing up' we settled into a more mature outlook, and waited on God to do what he said he would, in his own time and way. All he asked us to do was preach Christ's message about the incoming Kingdom.....so we did. Jesus said it was to be done right up till "the end". (Matthew 24:14)

Quite. Which, as I said, is what bothers me about these sorts of theologies. You're self defeating. Anything bad? Proof the devil is acting against us. Anything good? Proof that the devil is tricking us and acting against us. It's a no win dilemma.

When you read the Bible you can see clearly what the devil is up to.

In 2 Corinthians 2:11 Paul mentions about forgiveness and the importance of it and then he said we need to keep that forgiving attitude "so that we may not be overreached by Satan, for we are not ignorant of his designs". Jesus taught us what to look for because the devil has "designs"...carefully thought out ways to make us discouraged and disgruntled with life.

I appreciate your kind thoughts

I am sorry that life has been unkind to you. This is not the life God planned for us originally, but we will get back what we lost thanks to Christ's sacrifice. I hope you will be there to see how wonderful life can be without the devil interfering with everything.
 

HonestJoe

Well-Known Member
The point of the OP was to highlight the fact that we don't always know what's happening in the world unless the media are instructed to broadcast it.
You still seem to be evading the point that your OP was based on the lie that 4.5 magnitude earthquakes are deemed “major” and the false implication that the 144 earthquakes of this magnitude in a week is in any way unusually or newsworthy.

Do great earthquakes only make the news when there is great loss of life or substantial damage to property?
Pretty much, yes. What else would you expect? As has already been pointed out to you multiple times, there are thousands of earthquakes of varying magnitudes every week. Why would they all be reported on. How could they all be reported on? They are all recorded and studied by professionals in the field and that data isn’t hidden if anyone cares to look at it but like countless other things that happen every day, that doesn’t make them “news”.

What else don't we know? And when we only hear bad news, night after night, any wonder there is an epidemic of depression!
I don’t see your point here. You seem to be arguing for more reporting of negative events like earthquakes but now you’re complaining about there being too much bad news. There seems to be no consistent basis to what you’re saying in the thread, you’re just flinging stud out then trying to tie it to your existing religious beliefs.
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
You still seem to be evading the point that your OP was based on the lie that 4.5 magnitude earthquakes are deemed “major” and the false implication that the 144 earthquakes of this magnitude in a week is in any way unusually or newsworthy.
I noticed the article said those things.
Deeje was quoting from the article.....the author said that.

I wouldn't call M4.5 'major', either....but that many within a week timeframe is unusual.
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
see, that's not evidence of anything increasing. I say again, sure, there's plenty of bad stuff happening, but there's ALWAYS been bad stuff happening. What makes you think any of the bad stuff happening now is any more significant than anything previously?

That's because we've been living with it, and it's been a gradual rate. But people's attitudes and actions have been getting progressively worse, since 1914. Here is proof:


“Everything would get better and better. This was the world I was born in. . . . Suddenly, unexpectedly, one morning in 1914 the whole thing came to an end.”—British statesman Harold Macmillan, The New York Times, November 23, 1980.

“Increasingly, the 75-year period from 1914 to 1989, covering two world wars and the cold war, is being seen by historians as a single, discrete epoch, a time apart in which much of the world was fighting war, recovering from war or preparing for war.”—The New York Times, May 7, 1995.

“The whole world really blew up about World War I and we still don’t know why. Before then, men thought that utopia was in sight. There was peace and prosperity. Then everything blew up. We’ve been in a state of suspended animation ever since . . . More people have been killed in this century than in all of history.”—Dr. Walker Percy, American Medical News, November 21, 1977.

“It is indeed the year 1914 rather than that of Hiroshima which marks the turning point in our time, for by now we can see that . . . it was the first world war that ushered in the era of confused transition in the midst of which we are floundering.”—Dr. René Albrecht-Carrié, Barnard College, The Scientific Monthly, July 1951.

“In 1914 the world lost a coherence which it has not managed to recapture since
. . . . This has been a time of extraordinary disorder and violence, both across national frontiers and within them.”—The Economist, London, August 4, 1979.

“World War I and its aftermath led to the greatest economic depression in history during the early 1930’s. The consequences of the war and the problems of adjustment to peace led to unrest in almost every nation.”–The World Book Encyclopedia (1966, Vol. 20) on page 379 under its heading “World War I”

Author Maurice Genevoix, who was a military officer during that war, said of it: “Everyone agrees in recognizing that in the whole history of mankind, few dates have had the importance of August 2, 1914. First Europe and soon after almost all humanity found themselves plunged into a dreadful event. Conventions, agreements, moral laws, all the foundations shook; from one day to the next, everything was called into question. The event was to exceed both instinctive forebodings and reasonable anticipations. Enormous, chaotic, monstrous, it still drags us in its wake.”—Maurice Genevoix, member of the Académie Française, quoted in the book Promise of Greatness (1968).

“The modern era . . . began in 1914, and no one knows when or how it will end. . . . It could end in mass annihilation.”—The Seattle Times, January 1, 1959.

“In its scope, its violence, and above all, in its totality, it established a precedent. World War I ushered in the century of Total War, of—in the first full sense of the term—global war. . . .Never before 1914-1918 had a war absorbed so much of the total resources of so many combatants and covered so large a part of the earth. Never had so many nations been involved. Never had the slaughter been so comprehensive and indiscriminate.”–World War I, by H.W. Baldwin, pages 1,2

The World Book Encyclopedia noted that the number of soldiers killed and wounded was over 37,000,000, and added:
“The number of civilian deaths in areas of actual war totaled about 5,000,000. Starvation, disease, and exposure accounted for about 80 of every 100 of these civilian deaths. Spanish influenza, which some persons blamed on the war, caused tens of millions of other deaths.”—1966 edition, Vol. 20, p. 377.

More than 50 years after 1914, German statesman Konrad Adenauer wrote: “Security and quiet have disappeared from the lives of men since 1914.”—The West Parker, Cleveland, Ohio, January 20, 1966.

“Some historians believe that the 20th century will be seen as a time of unparalleled savagery,” notes The New York Times.

An article in The Washington Post concurs: “Our 20th-century wars have been ‘total wars’ against combatants and civilians alike,” it says. “The casualties, including the genocide of the Jews, are measured in the tens of millions. The barbarian wars of centuries past were alley fights in comparison.” Civil insurrections have added to the carnage. How many have died? “The ‘megadeaths’ since 1914, by an estimate of Zbigniew Brzezinski, have totaled 197 million, ‘the equivalent of more than one in ten of the total world population in 1900,’” says the Post. It adds that it is an “indisputable fact that terrorism and wanton killing are embedded deeply in the culture of this century” and that “no political or economic system has so far in this century pacified or satisfied the restless millions.”

As regards economic consequences, Ashby Bladen, a senior vice president of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, writes: “Before 1914 the monetary and the financial systems were compatible. . . . If one takes August 1914 as marking the dividing line between them, the contrasts between the nineteenth and the twentieth centuries are striking. In many aspects of human affairs there has been a complete reversal of trend. . . . One major reason was the severance of the linkage between the financial system and money with intrinsic value that began in 1914. . . . The breaking of the linkage was a momentous event. . . . 1914 marked a radical, and in the end catastrophic, transformation of that system.”

“The 19th century—defined as a set of beliefs, assumptions, attitudes and morals—did not end on Jan. 1, 1901,” wrote columnist Charley Reese. “It ended in 1914. That’s also when the 20th century, defined the same way, began.”
Reese explained: “Virtually all of the conflicts that we have been concerned with all of our lives stemmed from that [first world] war. . . . It destroyed 19th century optimism and created the 20th century versions of hedonism, cynicism, anxiety, angst and nihilism.”
 
Last edited:

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I noticed the article said those things.
Deeje was quoting from the article.....the author said that.

I wouldn't call M4.5 'major', either....but that many within a week timeframe is unusual.
Except, that it isn't:



"Dr. Stephen Malone, research professor emeritus at the University of Washington, conducted several different searches of earthquake activity, checking for the number of occurrences above a threshold magnitude of 4.5 both worldwide and in the Ring of Fire, also known as the circum-Pacific tectonic belt.

Malone found no unusual number of occurrences in the previous one or two months, he told AccuWeather. "In fact, the number of really large events [with a magnitude greater than 6.5] over the past two months is quite a bit below the average over the past several years," he said."
Is the Ring of Fire more active with volcanoes, earthquakes than usual this month?

https://www.iris.edu/hq/files/publications/brochures_onepagers/doc/EN_OnePager3.pdf

That's because we've been living with it, and it's been a gradual rate. But people's attitudes and actions have been getting progressively worse, since 1914. Here is proof:


“Everything would get better and better. This was the world I was born in. . . . Suddenly, unexpectedly, one morning in 1914 the whole thing came to an end.”—British statesman Harold Macmillan, The New York Times, November 23, 1980.

“Increasingly, the 75-year period from 1914 to 1989, covering two world wars and the cold war, is being seen by historians as a single, discrete epoch, a time apart in which much of the world was fighting war, recovering from war or preparing for war.”—The New York Times, May 7, 1995.

“The whole world really blew up about World War I and we still don’t know why. Before then, men thought that utopia was in sight. There was peace and prosperity. Then everything blew up. We’ve been in a state of suspended animation ever since . . . More people have been killed in this century than in all of history.”—Dr. Walker Percy, American Medical News, November 21, 1977.

“It is indeed the year 1914 rather than that of Hiroshima which marks the turning point in our time, for by now we can see that . . . it was the first world war that ushered in the era of confused transition in the midst of which we are floundering.”—Dr. René Albrecht-Carrié, Barnard College, The Scientific Monthly, July 1951.

“In 1914 the world lost a coherence which it has not managed to recapture since
. . . . This has been a time of extraordinary disorder and violence, both across national frontiers and within them.”—The Economist, London, August 4, 1979.

“World War I and its aftermath led to the greatest economic depression in history during the early 1930’s. The consequences of the war and the problems of adjustment to peace led to unrest in almost every nation.”–The World Book Encyclopedia (1966, Vol. 20) on page 379 under its heading “World War I”

Author Maurice Genevoix, who was a military officer during that war, said of it: “Everyone agrees in recognizing that in the whole history of mankind, few dates have had the importance of August 2, 1914. First Europe and soon after almost all humanity found themselves plunged into a dreadful event. Conventions, agreements, moral laws, all the foundations shook; from one day to the next, everything was called into question. The event was to exceed both instinctive forebodings and reasonable anticipations. Enormous, chaotic, monstrous, it still drags us in its wake.”—Maurice Genevoix, member of the Académie Française, quoted in the book Promise of Greatness (1968).

“The modern era . . . began in 1914, an
d no one knows when or how it will end. . . . It could end in mass annihilation.”—The Seattle Times, January 1, 1959.

“In its scope, its violence, and above all, in its totality, it established a precedent. World War I ushered in the century of Total War, of—in the first full sense of the term—global war. . . .Never before 1914-1918 had a war absorbed so much of the total resources of so many combatants and covered so large a part of the earth. Never had so many nations been involved. Never had the slaughter been so comprehensive and indiscriminate.”–World War I, by H.W. Baldwin, pages 1,2

The World Book Encyclopedia noted that the number of soldiers killed and wounded was over 37,000,000, and added:
“The number of civilian deaths in areas of actual war totaled about 5,000,000. Starvation, disease, and exposure accounted for about 80 of every 100 of these civilian deaths. Spanish influenza, which some persons blamed on the war, caused tens of millions of other deaths.”—1966 edition, Vol. 20, p. 377.

More than 50 years after 1914, German statesman Konrad Adenauer wrote: “Security and quiet have disappeared from the lives of men since 1914.”—The West Parker, Cleveland, Ohio, January 20, 1966.

“Some historians believe that the 20th century will be seen as a time of unparalleled savagery,” notes The New York Times.

An article in The Washington Post concurs: “Our 20th-century wars have been ‘total wars’ against combatants and civilians alike,” it says. “The casualties, including the genocide of the Jews, are measured in the tens of millions. The barbarian wars of centuries past were alley fights in comparison.” Civil insurrections have added to the carnage. How many have died? “The ‘megadeaths’ since 1914, by an estimate of Zbigniew Brzezinski, have totaled 197 million, ‘the equivalent of more than one in ten of the total world population in 1900,’” says the Post. It adds that it is an “indisputable fact that terrorism and wanton killing are embedded deeply in the culture of this century” and that “no political or economic system has so far in this century pacified or satisfied the restless millions.”

As regards economic consequences, Ashby Bladen, a senior vice president of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, writes: “Before 1914 the monetary and the financial systems were compatible. . . . If one takes August 1914 as marking the dividing line between them, the contrasts between the nineteenth and the twentieth centuries are striking. In many aspects of human affairs there has been a complete reversal of trend. . . . One major reason was the severance of the linkage between the financial system and money with intrinsic value that began in 1914. . . . The breaking of the linkage was a momentous event. . . . 1914 marked a radical, and in the end catastrophic, transformation of that system.”

“The 19th century—defined as a set of beliefs, assumptions, attitudes and morals—did not end on Jan. 1, 1901,” wrote columnist Charley Reese. “It ended in 1914. That’s also when the 20th century, defined the same way, began.”
Reese explained: “Virtually all of the conflicts that we have been concerned with all of our lives stemmed from that [first world] war. . . . It destroyed 19th century optimism and created the 20th century versions of hedonism, cynicism, anxiety, angst and nihilism.”
The proof is in the statistics that have been cited within this thread. They don't agree with your bleak analysis.
 
Last edited:

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
The Earth Has Been Hit by 144 Major Earthquakes in the Last Week And No One Is Talking About It

Imagine! 144 major earthquakes in one week and no news network said boo about it.

"The phenomenon is occurring along a horseshoe-shaped active seismic belt called the ‘Ring of Fire’, an area that runs around the edge of the Pacific basin. The area is well known for a large number of volcanoes and earthquake epicenters, due to the fact that it runs along the boundaries of the planet’s tectonic plates. In fact, most of the world’s strongest earthquakes, and 75% of the world’s volcanoes are all located along these fault lines.

1-1.jpg



In order to be considered a ‘major earthquake’, that means that each of these earthquakes exceeds a magnitude of 4.5. These aren’t minor tremors. These are major events with the potential to dramatically alter the lives of those that they impact."


For those of us interested in Bible prophesy, these quakes may be significant. (Matthew 24:7)

Thoughts?

Actually,A major earthquake registers between 7 and 7.9 on the Richter scale. A moderate earthquake would be 5 to 5.9 on the Richter scale.
See the attached link for list of quakes in last 7 days. There were not 144 major quakes, not even if you include those that are 4 and above, which are not major.
Earthquakes Worldwide Last 7 Days - Long Beach Weather
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
I wouldn't call M4.5 'major', either....but that many within a week timeframe is unusual.
When I had a program that posted every recorded earthquake, I had to set the threshold to six and above because anything less is so frequent that the program produced a constant barrage of earthquakes. As for 4 - 4.9 earthquakes, on average there are about 190 of them a week.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Actually,A major earthquake registers between 7 and 7.9 on the Richter scale. A moderate earthquake would be 5 to 5.9 on the Richter scale.
See the attached link for list of quakes in last 7 days. There were not 144 major quakes, not even if you include those that are 4 and above, which are not major.
Earthquakes Worldwide Last 7 Days - Long Beach Weather
Here is a source citing those earthquakes, and despite nobody talking about it it turns out it was being talked about.
Megaquake fears after planet shaken by 144 earthquakes in seven days
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
When I had a program that posted every recorded earthquake, I had to set the threshold to six and above because anything less is so frequent that the program produced a constant barrage of earthquakes. As for 4 - 4.9 earthquakes, on average there are about 190 of them a week.
.
One thing that should set off a couple of alarm bells it that the claim of the OP cannot be properly checked with an independent source. the choice of 4.5 on the Richter scale makes it very hard to combine the same values. But the apparent large number of quakes in the low ranges tells us that in all probability there is nothing to the claim in the source from the OP.
 
Top