• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

This was 2015 but...but... it just can't be true. Can it?

QuestioningMind

Well-Known Member
Who's in the White House at the moment...winning!




Oh, now this makes total sense....not.





There, there....everything will be alright....


Who's in the White House at the moment...winning!

Note how he flings his own pool, foolishly thinking that it somehow makes him look powerful and intimidating... while pathetically pointing out that he considers a president who has no respect for the constitution and who has spent the last 4 years denigrating the rule of law in an attempt to tear this nation apart to be someone who is 'winning'.

Yet another of those uneducated voters that Trump absolutely loves and without whom he wouldn't be president.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
OOOO....scary!
Know what I find odd? Your avatar just doesn't seem to fit. I see it more as something like this
depositphotos_25933831-stock-illustration-redneck-spade-kiler.jpg
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
The ironic thing about it is that Mad Magazine certainly weren't fans of Trump.
Really?

I'd have thought all satirical media outlets were huge fans of Trump.

It's generally called "job security".
Tom

ETA ~The new Charlie Hebdo magazine could get a grip on that ~
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Of course it was. The whole "derangement syndrome" thing is just a stupid, lazy, dismissive handwave. You simply presented a "but Hillary" moment so I had to drop it in.
TDS is real.
I've seen it reduce otherwise sane people into hostile irrational foes.
When dissing having voted for Trump, this invites reasons why.
So the subject of her was thus already broached in an insult from your side.

If'n you don't want to hear about someone,
then don't continually bring up her context,
& then object to an appropriate response.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Trump has proven to be such a disasterous dumpster fire that he makes the previously worst president (G.W. Bush) look golden in comparison, so to think Hillary - as awful as she was - would somehow still be even worse is irrational and points to "HDS" being just as real.
It started before he even assumed office.
I disagree about Dubya. I find him to have been a
worse President, primarily because of starting the 2 wars.
You never really considered Hillary's record...you just
voted against Trump (as I recall).
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
just
voted against Trump (as I recall).
I voted for Gary because at the time he was the one who most closely matched my views, and I was certainly under no illusion that his **** didn't stink.
I didn't like Trump then, but had no idea of how horrific of a trainwreck would await us.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
@Father Heathen @Revoltingest
Sorry to but in. But can I just ask out of sheer curiosity, what’s evil about Hilary?
I keep hearing how awful she is and since I’m not American and not old enough to truly remember Bush, I feel like I am sorely lacking in context.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
@Father Heathen @Revoltingest
Sorry to but in. But can I just ask out of sheer curiosity, what’s evil about Hilary?
I keep hearing how awful she is and not being American and not old enough to truly remember Bush, I feel like I am sorely lacking in context.
Actually, we were bantering...at least I was.
I don't think she's evil.
The "lesser of 2 evils" aspect of voting in 2016 prolly gave a false impression.
I don't even dislike her.
Although calling her the "Hildabeast" was fun.
But I thought results under her reign would be worse than under Trump's.
I disliked that choice.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
Actually, we were bantering...at least I was.
I don't think she's evil.
The "lesser of 2 evils" aspect of voting in 2016 prolly gave a false impression.
I don't even dislike her.
But I thought results under her reign would be worse than under Trump's.
Why would you come to that conclusion, in that case?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Why would you come to that conclusion, in that case?
She had a record of being pro-war, authoritarian, & incompetent.
(In order of significance there.)
One sign of authoritarianism was the (fortunately failed to launch)
single payer health care plan she pushed. It allowed no plan B,
ie, private market health care would've been illegal.
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
@Father Heathen @Revoltingest
Sorry to but in. But can I just ask out of sheer curiosity, what’s evil about Hilary?
I keep hearing how awful she is and since I’m not American and not old enough to truly remember Bush, I feel like I am sorely lacking in context.

She's not evil. She's just another by the books Democrat politician. She seemed to have a mostly careful campaign, then she happened to call Trump voters a "basket of deplorables" which caused a huge backlash. At the presidential debates, Trump kept bringing up how she should be in jail due to her using a private email account for government business, and caused a rally of people to his side with his statements. Then it was announced that her emails were being investigated, which she didn't end up really getting in trouble for, but the announcement of the investigation and Trump airing political commercials about it.... it was just enough to beat Hilary.
 
Top