• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Three headteachers on Ukraine and Russia:

Three headteachers have different attitudes towards aggressive behaviour:

Headteacher A is from the nineteen thirties. His view is this:
"When persuasion fails, smack. Use the cane, the birch, the ruler or just the flat of your hand, but people need to know that they will be physically hurt if their bad behaviour crosses certain lines."

Headteacher B is from the nineteen eighties. His view is this:
"Punishment is an essential component of discipline, but all physical punishments can be replaced by something else, from forced writing of lines through litter duty to loss of privileges such as school trips and other entertainments."

Headteacher C is from the twenty twenties. His view is this:
"Nobody is bad and nobody should be punished. You can solve any problem related to a person's behaviour through education, understanding, more understanding, tolerance, occasionally asking the aggressive person to reconsider their actions, more understanding, tolerance and please like me."

Which of these headteachers is most likely to look back at the conflict and say "I told you so!"?
 

MyM

Well-Known Member
Three headteachers have different attitudes towards aggressive behaviour:

Headteacher A is from the nineteen thirties. His view is this:
"When persuasion fails, smack. Use the cane, the birch, the ruler or just the flat of your hand, but people need to know that they will be physically hurt if their bad behaviour crosses certain lines."

Headteacher B is from the nineteen eighties. His view is this:
"Punishment is an essential component of discipline, but all physical punishments can be replaced by something else, from forced writing of lines through litter duty to loss of privileges such as school trips and other entertainments."

Headteacher C is from the twenty twenties. His view is this:
"Nobody is bad and nobody should be punished. You can solve any problem related to a person's behaviour through education, understanding, more understanding, tolerance, occasionally asking the aggressive person to reconsider their actions, more understanding, tolerance and please like me."

Which of these headteachers is most likely to look back at the conflict and say "I told you so!"?

lol #1
 

Kooky

Freedom from Sanity
Would you say that these teachers are directly responsible for the war in Ukraine?
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Three headteachers have different attitudes towards aggressive behaviour:

Headteacher A is from the nineteen thirties. His view is this:
"When persuasion fails, smack. Use the cane, the birch, the ruler or just the flat of your hand, but people need to know that they will be physically hurt if their bad behaviour crosses certain lines."

Headteacher B is from the nineteen eighties. His view is this:
"Punishment is an essential component of discipline, but all physical punishments can be replaced by something else, from forced writing of lines through litter duty to loss of privileges such as school trips and other entertainments."

Headteacher C is from the twenty twenties. His view is this:
"Nobody is bad and nobody should be punished. You can solve any problem related to a person's behaviour through education, understanding, more understanding, tolerance, occasionally asking the aggressive person to reconsider their actions, more understanding, tolerance and please like me."

Which of these headteachers is most likely to look back at the conflict and say "I told you so!"?
I smell a straw man.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Three headteachers have different attitudes towards aggressive behaviour:

Headteacher A is from the nineteen thirties. His view is this:
"When persuasion fails, smack. Use the cane, the birch, the ruler or just the flat of your hand, but people need to know that they will be physically hurt if their bad behaviour crosses certain lines."

Headteacher B is from the nineteen eighties. His view is this:
"Punishment is an essential component of discipline, but all physical punishments can be replaced by something else, from forced writing of lines through litter duty to loss of privileges such as school trips and other entertainments."

Headteacher C is from the twenty twenties. His view is this:
"Nobody is bad and nobody should be punished. You can solve any problem related to a person's behaviour through education, understanding, more understanding, tolerance, occasionally asking the aggressive person to reconsider their actions, more understanding, tolerance and please like me."

Which of these headteachers is most likely to look back at the conflict and say "I told you so!"?

The main thing about teachers is that they're typically dealing with children who are much smaller, less able to process information, and more easily manipulated. Once the kids graduate from school and move on to military service, then it's a different set of rules and a different philosophy.
 
The three headteachers are not just expressing views on the raising of children, but also on what the normal response to malicious behaviour should be from whoever is in charge.

All three approaches could be applied to Russia in some shape or form.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
The three headteachers are not just expressing views on the raising of children, but also on what the normal response to malicious behaviour should be from whoever is in charge.

All three approaches could be applied to Russia in some shape or form.

Who is in charge?
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
The three headteachers are not just expressing views on the raising of children, but also on what the normal response to malicious behaviour should be from whoever is in charge.

All three approaches could be applied to Russia in some shape or form.

Your statement about a 2020's head teacher is wrong. I know teachers and none of them say that. So it's a straw man that is generally false although a few might act that way.

Take as an analogy a man with a gun in a classroom and a police negotiating team. Because that's a much better analogy. Look online for how cops negotiate in such situations and learn from that.
 
Headteacher 3 is an amalgam of the heads of Barrowhead in the UK, of Filomata ("Bring a switchblade to class if you like. We'll turn a blind eye.") in Gliwice, Poland, and of Дубравушка in Obninsk, Russia.
 

Kooky

Freedom from Sanity
Headteacher 3 is an amalgam of the heads of Barrowhead in the UK, of Filomata ("Bring a switchblade to class if you like. We'll turn a blind eye.") in Gliwice, Poland, and of Дубравушка in Obninsk, Russia.
So, made up.
 
Top