Secret Chief
Veteran Member
You mean I'm your Number 1 then?I've only ignored one. They fit into category 1.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You mean I'm your Number 1 then?I've only ignored one. They fit into category 1.
Not being able to put any staff on ignore must be a contravention of some human right.I've only ever had one person on ignore, and that was only for about 10 minutes (so probably shouldn't count).
I do have a go **** yourself list though.
I think I have the same 1 person on ignore (without naming them) I think they went senile.Just checked and I seem to have no-one on ignore. I did put someone on ignore a while back simply because each of their posts was about three screens worth of incoherent nonsense. Easier to put on ignore than get repetitive strain injury from all the scrolling.
I think I have the same 1 person on ignore (without naming them) I think they went senile.
I am confused about your confusion and your reply in general, but I’m okay with that."1 person" ---> "them" ---> "they"
Clearly somebody really got to you! (I wonder who they are ...)
Me too.I am confused about your confusion and your reply in general, but I’m okay with that.
I'll race ya!Lets all see how fast we can be put on the new list!
"1 person" ---> "them" ---> "they"
Clearly somebody really got to you! (I wonder who they are ...)
I am confused about your confusion and your reply in general, but I’m okay with that.
We don't always know or remember everyMe too.
No wonder you ignore my questions.The mentally ill and the persistently bigoted get to live in the ignore list for me. Since I started doing this my RF experience has improved dramatically.
Exactly; which is why I was confused as to the issue.We don't always know or remember every
other poster's gender. "They" has been
used as the gender neutral singular since
the 14th century.
It's Jay.Exactly; which is why I was confused as to the issue.
Same here.I don't think anyone is on my ignore list. I just ignore the people I choose to on different threads and go from there,
I totally agree!Same here.
Is this a case of sharing one brain?
If so, be advised that @ChristineM is involved.
BTW, that does not make this a 3 way.
Same here.
Is this a case of sharing one brain?
If so, be advised that @ChristineM is involved.
BTW, that does not make this a 3 way.
We don't always know or remember every
other poster's gender. "They" has been
used as the gender neutral singular since
the 14th century.
We've been using it without giving it muchI tend to use "he or she," sometimes "she or he," and often "s/he."
To be honest, I tend to default to the OED definition and find the "14th century" reference surprising, especially since I've read quite a lot over my 79 years and cannot recall ever encountering a single such a usage.
Still, the "14th century" reference is interesting. Thanks.