Further Explanation: "Everything is True AND False"
I want to expand a little bit on the "Harm" example previously cited ...
Because it is sometimes kind to be cruel, harm IS therefore BOTH harm, AND
NOT harm. The best example of when this can occur, is when you want to be compassionate toward someone, but doing so would not be compassionate to yourself.
The above statements only work in terms of PERCEPTIONS - not absolute truths. Now, just as the current moment is all we really have, so to is our current perception, the only one we really have.
BUT, we may have
memories of OTHER perceptions we have had. Each remembered perception was TRUE at some point. Keeping perceptions in memory effectively "stacks" them accumulatively. And
this is precisely the context where harm being harm, and
not harm, is relevant and correct.
To review the example in these terms: Perhaps once someone asked you - "Is harm always bad?" (or
Is harm always harm?), and you said, "Of course it is!". But later you wanted to be kind to someone, but realized that if you were, you would suffer yourself, so you decided to be "cruel to be kind" (It is my belief that when living compassionatley, oneself is always the first customer).
So now you have the memory of harm just being harm,
plus the new perception that harm is sometimes kind (not harm). See?
Now, since it IS possible to believe
anything, it IS also true to say that "Everything is True, And False". See?
AND, because these states of truth and falsity are NOT mutually exclusive, they in fact represent CHOICES. This is a tricky concept, and warrants some thought. I arrive at it from quantum mechanics, but that's not necessary.
Now, ONLY the MORALLY best choices will succeed, because only THEY can spread enlightenment (in the dictionary sense). The LESSER choices will only spread, literally, like bad ideas.
So, to accept this whole theory, is also to accept that the majority of humans still do prefer to do the right thing, at all times.
I'm sure this is still unclear to many, but please; wrestle with the parts you don't accept. You'll notice that everything I've said to date is drawn on in this post.
If you are satisified, go and review my "Theory of the true nature of reality" - you're not far off it now