We might speculate thus:
Normally, we perceive a distinction between ourselves and other things. A distinction between the subject (ourselves) of perception and the things perceived by us.
Now, there are various kinds of mystical experiences, but one kind of mystical experience involves an abrupt cessation of subject/object perception while some kind of experiencing yet continues. That is, subject/object perception is replaced by a perception or sense of the One or the oneness of all things. In this kind of experiencing, there is no psychological self, no "I" distinct from the things perceived.
Also, if one loves during this sort of experiencing, when one is making no distinction between oneself and other things, one's love is selfless, or altruistic.
Of course, mere intellectual understanding of this sort of loving is not the same as experiencing it. Without experiencing it, all discussion is at best speculation.
Please discuss.
Normally, we perceive a distinction between ourselves and other things. A distinction between the subject (ourselves) of perception and the things perceived by us.
Now, there are various kinds of mystical experiences, but one kind of mystical experience involves an abrupt cessation of subject/object perception while some kind of experiencing yet continues. That is, subject/object perception is replaced by a perception or sense of the One or the oneness of all things. In this kind of experiencing, there is no psychological self, no "I" distinct from the things perceived.
Also, if one loves during this sort of experiencing, when one is making no distinction between oneself and other things, one's love is selfless, or altruistic.
Of course, mere intellectual understanding of this sort of loving is not the same as experiencing it. Without experiencing it, all discussion is at best speculation.
Please discuss.
Last edited: