The possible existence of a corroborating witness is a complicating factor.Notice how this Foxnews affiliate (what a surprise) jumps past the beginning of the story (Zimmerman calling 911 telling the dispatcher that he is following "a real suspicious guy" who "looks like he's... on drugs or something" before this previously undisclosed witness's testimony would apply, but acknowledging: "And from that moment to the shooting, details are few." Sol let's just make something up: "The witness only wanted to be identified as "John," and didn't not want to be shown on camera." Yeah, that's good enough for me! And good enough for most Foxnews viewers.....just scroll through the comments thread! That will tell you something about what makes these people tick.
Impugning the source without any evidence?
We expect more than just anti-Fox diatribes here.