Why do you think she didn't cash it immediately?LIKE I SAID, many checks are no good after that long. Especially, but not limited to, business checks.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why do you think she didn't cash it immediately?LIKE I SAID, many checks are no good after that long. Especially, but not limited to, business checks.
It's a joke about her making good use of that check now.From the initial article linked to the thread:
"Michael Steele, former chair of the Republican National Committee, snarked: “When Trump wrote that check to re-elect Kamala Harris in 2011, I bet he didn’t think she’d cash it in 2024!”
I don't know when she cashed it but my point remains true @Revoltingest.
We'll see, I guess.It's a joke about her making good use of that check now.
In this campaign it has more value than a mere $8,000.
How about your biases and your failure to respond to Trump's endorsement of QAnon, hedonistic morality, denying the election results and conviction of crimes, Don't let reality get in the way of your biases."We" don't know any such thing.
Keep chanting your mantra. Don't let reality get in the way of your biases.
Thats ok, she made good use of it and donated it charity a long time ago.Many checks are not good after awhile.
I do not see this as a win. Based on the sleazy hedonistic behavior on tap and convicted in courts. His endorsement of QAnon, and affiliation with extreme radicals like David Duke, Kenya-fuentes and extremists.There’s not a lot out there to really support your claim, a couple of clips doesn’t really indicate someone was broadly respected by ‘leftists’, unless you take 2 people’s comments in public forums to speak for all of their private thoughts. There’s nothing that contradicts it either, other than some comments about his general vulgarity and sleaziness. So, what evidence is available neither proves nor disproves your point, so I suppose you can take that as a win.
I hope so. Time will tell I guess. Or not. Doesn't much matter one way or the other.Thats ok, she made good use of it and donated it charity a long time ago.
Citation please. He hob-nobbed with them. He inserted himself in their social circles. But when, where, and how was he ever "respected" by them. If you go back and watch some 1980 sitcoms, especially Designing Women, you'll see Trump was a joke even then.
You need to document and not just claim lies and respond to the documented problems as cited. Are you considering them lies?I am saying that there are people that have lied about Trump. Since people have said dialectic, mutually exclusive things about Trump, logically there are people that have lied about Trump. That is ineluctable.
Yes, he was a part of the "circle" and tried to get his props through his wild party persona that ended his first marriage and has continued. He was super envious of Hefner, but instead of being sauve, he was crude.As I recall, Trump became popular during the Reagan era, when a multitude of liberals and Democrats decided to embrace Reagan's warmongering ultra-capitalism, which Trump fit right into (and the Clintons, too, as it would turn out). He became the media's fair-haired darling for quite some time - even if he was often a butt of thAeir jokes.
In any case, Trump was certainly not condemned and vilified as he is now, even though he has basically the same character that he always had. Maybe the media didn't do much investigating on him. Maybe they didn't want to report anything bad about him. It was the same with Reagan, as he was dubbed the "Teflon President."
I think that was a joke.“When Trump wrote that check to re-elect Kamala Harris in 2011, I bet he didn’t think she’d cash it in 2024!”
I hope it was.I think that was a joke.
Ain't that the truth?Every time someone lies for Trump, it entrenches his minions' faith.
I hope it's not. Though it's not like he'd actually see it anyways.I hope it was.
Well, whatever. I'm not voting for him and I don't really care one way or the other.I hope it's not. Though it's not like he'd actually see it anyways.
Yes, he was a part of the "circle" and tried to get his props through his wild party persona that ended his first marriage and has continued. He was super envious of Hefner, but instead of being sauve, he was crude.
He started finding his current niche through his friendship with the McMahons and WWF, and had started building a bit of a respectable fandom with his Apprentice TV show, but many saw the man he truly is even through that lens.
I'm sure he's still "accepted" in certain social circles that wouldn't publicly claim him anymore, but "respected"? Take notice how he can't take teasing and stays away from functions where rubbing is the norm.
This is part of what I've seen over the decades, and for me, the final nail in his disrespectability coffin was his inserted opinion over the Benghazi tragedy.
Could be worse.I never liked him from the get-go, but more than that, I was mystified that the media made him into anything at all. Why did they give him coverage like they did? What purpose did it serve? I've heard that the character of Gordon Gekko in Wall Street was based in part on Donald Trump. The blowhard, pushy types were not all that uncommon during those times. Trump was at center stage for those who idolized the rich and famous. The idealism of the 1960s had died in the cocaine-fueled 1980s.
I remember thinking that the country was already heading to hell in a handbasket back then, but nobody would listen. "Don't Worry, Be Happy" was the slogan of the time. But look at us now.
I would enjoy it if Trump actually looked at his own statements. He's so thin he'd be fueling jokes on comedy shows for awhile.Well, whatever. I'm not voting for him and I don't really care one way or the other.
As I recall, Trump became popular during the Reagan era, when a multitude of liberals and Democrats decided to embrace Reagan's warmongering ultra-capitalism, which Trump fit right into (and the Clintons, too, as it would turn out). He became the media's fair-haired darling for quite some time - even if he was often a butt of their jokes.
Of course he wasn't condemned and vilified. He was a buffoon, but he wasn't actively courting the worst portions of our society in a bid for enough power to overturn democracy. He was just a flashy, terrible businessman who did some stupid, bad things.In any case, Trump was certainly not condemned and vilified as he is now, even though he has basically the same character that he always had. Maybe the media didn't do much investigating on him. Maybe they didn't want to report anything bad about him. It was the same with Reagan, as he was dubbed the "Teflon President."