Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I dunno someone who berates the military would actively endeavor to equipment them for the job against this country's enemies.I'm sure he would agree that Trump is a sellout and clear and present danger to America.
Why would he respect a known draft dodger and someone who berates the military?
Truman’s top general was McArthurMany other who served with/under Trump are coming forward to
say how bad he is for the country. But who'd know Trump better
as a Commander In Chief than Mark Milley, eh.
I wonder how the Magas will spin this one?
Excerpted....
Trump’s top general calls ex-president ‘fascist to the core’ and ‘most dangerous person to this country,’ new book says
Story by Andrew Feinberg
Mark Milley, the US Army general who Donald Trump appointed as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, now says the current Republican presidential nominee is a “fascist to the core” and says no person has ever posed more of a danger to the United States than the man who served as the 45th President of the United States.
Milley, a decorated military officer who became a target for right-wing scorn after it became known that he expressed concerns over Trump’s mental stability in the wake of his 2020 election loss to Joe Biden, is described by journalist Bob Woodward in his new book, War, as incredibly alarmed at the prospect of a second Trump term in the White House. The Independent obtained a copy ahead of the book’s October 15 release date.
In the wake of the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol by a riotous mob of the then-president’s supporters, Woodward writes that Milley insisted on securing a meeting with the then-newly-minted attorney general, Merrick Garland, to urge him to investigate domestic violent extremism and far-right militia movements.
According to Woodward, a senior Department of Justice lawyer said at the time that Milley’s sit-down with Garland might have been the first-ever meeting between a chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the country’s top civilian law enforcement official. He writes that the general asked for the meeting because he was “deeply convinced” that Trump remained “a danger to the country” even though he had been forced from office after Biden’s election win.
But the Army veteran expressed even more strident concerns to Woodward himself at a March 2023 meeting at the Willard Hotel in Washington, DC.
Woodward writes that when he approached Milley at a reception, the general spoke first and told him: “We gotta talk.”
He told the journalist that “no one has ever been as dangerous to this country” as the former president.
He asked: “Do you realize, do you see what this man is?”
Milley, who had been a source for Woodward’s last book, Peril, said he’d “glimpsed” Trump’s true nature when they previously spoke during the writing of that 2021 release, but he said he now knew exactly what the ex-president is.
“He is the most dangerous person ever. I had suspicions when I talked to you about his mental decline and so forth, but now I realize he’s a total fascist. He is now the most dangerous person to this country,” he said.
“A fascist to the core,” Milley repeated.
The article continues from there.
Why?He (Trump) is not the ideal, for sure, but he does seem to be a bit more war shy, compared to the last few D Presidents.
The 99% of Americans have no idea of the history of Europe.He's pro-war. He just prefers invaders instead of defenders.
Yes, you are.You talk as if I am proud of our past, I'm not.
Ever the joker you are in my view, Vance announced he and Trump oppose the Pro Act, a bill that would strengthen the power of workers to organise collectively and bargain for better wages, benefits and working conditions.I just voted for trump. Time for more money for the working man.
No, I believe that Argentina lost all rights to them when they invaded. If they hadn't invaded, they could happily have them back.Yes, you are.
You think that the Falklands belong to Britain.
Let's say that they are inhabited by British people now...so they own that land.
And by the way... those regions now belong to the Russian Federation because Russians live there.
This is utterly laughable.No, I believe that Argentina lost all rights to them when they invaded. If they hadn't invaded, they could happily have them back.
I agree.The Falklands belong to the Falklanders now, they should determine their future.
Yes, I am a loyal servant of His Majesty the tsar.Are you another one of these people in Putin's paybook?
Why should Argentina 'own' the Falklands?This is utterly laughable.
They invaded because they were denied the rights to own those islands, according to the law of the sea.
I agree.
But you should also say, in order to be coherent, that Donbas belongs to the Donbaskie people...and they decided through referendum to join the Russian Federation.
Yes, I am a loyal servant of His Majesty the tsar.
Because they are very close to Argentina...Why should Argentina 'own' the Falklands?
Zero evidence.Only the Russian favouring people voted in that referendum, the Ukrainian favouring people boycotted it.
I am not a Freemason, though,At least you admit you are a Russian lackey.
99% of us know that Italy supported Hitler.The 99% of Americans have no idea of the history of Europe.
Me tooAs a UK citizen, I would happily hand Gibraltar and Northern Island back; but not the Falklands.
Ten years of 20th century history are nothing.99% of us know that Italy supported Hitler.
WW2 is “nothing”, eh.Ten years of 20th century history are nothing.
99% of Europeans have no idea of your history of Europe either.The 99% of Americans have no idea of the history of Europe.
Let alone the history of Ukraine.
This is a territorial controversy, not a world war.
Proximity doesn't = Ownership. If it is a separate country, like the Falklands, it should be independent (assuming it wants to be)Because they are very close to Argentina...
It's like France colonized the isle of Wight...and said it is French.
But it's something you cannot and will not understand.
It's in your brain. This :
The British are entitled to own the entire world.
The Russians are manure, so they are entitled to nothing, not even to own the regions where people speak Russian.
Zero evidence.
I am not a Freemason, though,
You are not a Freemason, either?
Because I consider being a Freemason more dishonorable.
A great moment in history is when Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal...and finally showed to the world that the Mediterranean was not a British lake any more.Proximity doesn't = Ownership. If it is a separate country, like the Falklands, it should be independent (assuming it wants to be)
An Empire is NOT in my brain, I was born about 30-years after the Empire ceased to exist. Just because some on the right in my country think we should own everywhere, it does not mean that we all do. I'm not a Brexiteer, I'm a Remainer, countries should work together for the better good.
Wikipedia article on the referendum ... 2014 Donbas status referendums - Wikipedia
What has Freemasonry got to do with anything? Was Soros a Freemason?
Taxpayer funded unions likely. Parasites on the working class and dosent represent the common working blue-collar worker in the least.Ever the joker you are in my view, Vance announced he and Trump oppose the Pro Act, a bill that would strengthen the power of workers to organise collectively and bargain for better wages, benefits and working conditions.
Still think they are on the side of the working man?
At least we were on the right side in WW2A great moment in history is when Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal...and finally showed to the world that the Mediterranean was not a British lake any more.
That is why the British have been hating Russians, who helped Nasser. SINCE THEN.
They don't hate Putin only. There are millions of Putins in Russia.