• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump: "I've told them I want more weeks."

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
But when it comes to people's sex lives, I expect people to be more honest and less prudish.
Well, that's just you forgetting how much of the United States is terrified of everything sexual because they're afraid that "god" might think they're sinful for enjoying it.
If in those states the legislation is becoming more and more inflexible, I would expect women to fight for free or affordable contraception.
What do you imagine your expectations have to do with Americans with views like the funadmentalist Christians I've just described? You can expect anything you want, but you're silly if you think you're going to get it.
And not to fight for the right to have unprotected sex.
You forget that protections fail, you forget that relationships and human minds change, you forget that what seemed like "true love" yesterday may be badly resented today . You forget that abnormalities can be determined pretty much at any time during a pregnancy. In short, you forget to incorporate human nature into your considerations. That's silly.
 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
Thankfully the teen pregnancy rate has been dropping a LOT for the past 30 plus years.
Yes it has and it is all those damned liberals that are responsible, JD Vance wants more babies so lets get rid of education and they don't need contraceptives if they are good Catholics. /s
 

We Never Know

No Slack
There is. It's called pro choice. The only ones against that want to take that middle ground away and infringe on the lives of others
A movement isn't a solution for everyone.

Half see a fetus as a baby
Half see it as basically a virus parasite

Half see abortion as taking a life
Half see abortion as a convenience

Some don't want abortions at all
Some are ok with abortion with exceptions
Some want abortions period

I could go on but... Those aren't going to change in my lifetime.
 
Last edited:

We Never Know

No Slack
Half seeing it as a "virus" and a "convenience" is a pretty big mischaracterization.
I didn't want to get pregnant
I don't want a baby
I have to get rid of this baby.
Abortion is a convenience that makes that happen.

It lives/feeds off its host(mother)
It would die without its host
Its a foreign object in the woman's body
So yeah its basically referred to as a virus parasite

You dont have to agree with me. But I'm not going to change what I said because you disagree.
 
Last edited:

Pogo

Well-Known Member
I didn't want to get pregnant
I don't want a baby
I have to get rid of this baby.
Abortion is a convenience that makes that happen.

It lives/feeds off its host(mother)
It would die without its host
Its a foreign object in the woman's body
So yeah its basically referred to as a virus.

You dont have to agree with me. But I'm not going to change what I said because you disagree.
Actually biologically the fetus is closer to a parasite in how the body responds to it, which is the cause of many pregnancy complications.

And nobody is saying that you have to have an abortion, but for the purposes of I did not intend to get pregnant and I do not want a baby now, for economic or any number of other reasons why should somebody other than myself make the decision for me in regards to a proceedure that has been done throughout recorded history, especially in these so called enlightened times where we guarantee liberty for all?

Don't want one, don't have one but as Tim says, "mind your own damn business."
 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
I didn't want to get pregnant
I don't want a baby
I have to get rid of this baby.
Abortion is a convenience that makes that happen.

It lives/feeds off its host(mother)
It would die without its host
Its a foreign object in the woman's body
So yeah its basically referred to as a virus.

You dont have to agree with me. But I'm not going to change what I said because you disagree.
Actually biologically the fetus is closer to a parasite in how the body responds to it, which is the cause of many pregnancy complications.

And nobody is saying that you have to have an abortion, but for the purposes of I did not intend to get pregnant and I do not want a baby now, for economic or any number of other reasons why should somebody other than myself make the decision for me in regards to a proceedure that has been done throughout recorded history, especially in these so called enlightened times where we guarantee liberty for all?

Don't want one, don't have one but as Tim says, "mind your own damn business."
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
There is. It's called pro choice. The only ones against that want to take that middle ground away and infringe on the lives of others

A movement isn't a solution for everyone.
The solution would be recognizing the right for a woman and her doctor to manage her pregnancy. We did just fine under Roe v Wade.
Half see a fetus as a baby
Half see it as basically a virus

Half see abortion as taking a life
Half see abortion as a convenience

Some don't want abortions at all
Some are ok with abortion with exceptions
Some want abortions period

I could go on but... Those aren't going to change in my lifetime.
How long is the effort to make pregnancy and childbirth third-world dangerous again going to last before people come to their senses?
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Actually biologically the fetus is closer to a parasite in how the body responds to it, which is the cause of many pregnancy complications.

And nobody is saying that you have to have an abortion, but for the purposes of I did not intend to get pregnant and I do not want a baby now, for economic or any number of other reasons why should somebody other than myself make the decision for me in regards to a proceedure that has been done throughout recorded history, especially in these so called enlightened times where we guarantee liberty for all?

Don't want one, don't have one but as Tim says, "mind your own damn business."

Yes parasite is the word I was looking for but was having a brain fart. Thanks for the correction.
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
I didn't want to get pregnant
I don't want a baby
I have to get rid of this baby.
Abortion is a convenience that makes that happen.

It lives/feeds off its host(mother)
It would die without its host
Its a foreign object in the woman's body
So yeah its basically referred to as a virus.

You dont have to agree with me. But I'm not going to change what I said because you disagree.

Those who advocate for pro-choice are factoring in a lot more than convenience and seeing it as a virus/parasite. There are legitimate health risks to the mother, as well as the consideration of what kind of life might be awaiting the child.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Those who advocate for pro-choice are factoring in a lot more than convenience and seeing it as a virus/parasite. There are legitimate health risks to the mother, as well as the consideration of what kind of life might be awaiting the child.
I've told this before I will make this a short version.
When I was in my early twentites I had a woman abort our child without telling me.
Six months later when we were talking about marriage she came clean.
It took both of us to make it, so IMO we both should have had a say about it.
Long story short, I walked away and never looked back.
 

Soandso

ᛋᛏᚨᚾᛞ ᛋᚢᚱᛖ
A movement isn't a solution for everyone.

I don't think I've ever heard pro-life or pro-choice positions being described as "movements" before. How can something be a movement when choice has been the standard for half a century up until very recently

Half see a fetus as a baby
Half see it as basically a virus

Half see abortion as taking a life
Half see abortion as a convenience

Some don't want abortions at all
Some are ok with abortion with exceptions
Some want abortions period

I could go on but... Those aren't going to change in my lifetime.

Exactly, which is where choice comes in. On the one hand, pro choice gives people the ability to choose for themselves if they want abortions or not. On the other hand, pro-life wants to strip away women's autonomy and force them to carry a pregnancy to term. How does one come to a middle ground when trying to reason with someone who has a mindset like that?

Where's the middle ground when trying to reason with someone who thinks you are a murderer for getting an abortion because a verse in the Bible says that God knew you before you were formed in the womb?
 

We Never Know

No Slack
I don't think I've ever heard pro-life or pro-choice positions being described as "movements" before. How can something be a movement when choice has been the standard for half a century up until very recently



Exactly, which is where choice comes in. On the one hand, pro choice gives people the ability to choose for themselves if they want abortions or not. On the other hand, pro-life wants to strip away women's autonomy and force them to carry a pregnancy to term. How does one come to a middle ground when trying to reason with someone who has a mindset like that?

Where's the middle ground when trying to reason with someone who thinks you are a murderer for getting an abortion because a verse in the Bible says that God knew you before you were formed in the womb?

"Anti-abortion movements, also self-styled as pro-life movements,[1] are involved in the abortion debate advocating against the practice of abortion and its legality. Many anti-abortion movements began as countermovements in response to the legalization of elective abortions."

 

We Never Know

No Slack
I don't think I've ever heard pro-life or pro-choice positions being described as "movements" before. How can something be a movement when choice has been the standard for half a century up until very recently



Exactly, which is where choice comes in. On the one hand, pro choice gives people the ability to choose for themselves if they want abortions or not. On the other hand, pro-life wants to strip away women's autonomy and force them to carry a pregnancy to term. How does one come to a middle ground when trying to reason with someone who has a mindset like that?

Where's the middle ground when trying to reason with someone who thinks you are a murderer for getting an abortion because a verse in the Bible says that God knew you before you were formed in the womb?

Also google pro-choice and wiki has this...

Abortion-rights movements[a] are movements that advocate for legal access to induced abortion services, including elective abortion. They seek to represent and support women who wish to terminate their pregnancy without fear of legal or social backlash. These movements are in direct opposition to anti-abortion movements.

 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
Also google pro-choice and wiki has this...

Abortion-rights movements[a] are movements that advocate for legal access to induced abortion services, including elective abortion. They seek to represent and support women who wish to terminate their pregnancy without fear of legal or social backlash. These movements are in direct opposition to anti-abortion movements.

Yeah so, there has been movement in the attempt to clarify the positions since persons who wish to deny all the availability of an abortions for personal reasons and implied that the converse was to recomend abortions for no reason have seen the backlash to clarify the position as making abortion available as a choice.

Like many words movement has many meanings in different contexts, are you part of a movement in the morning after drinking your morning coffee?
 
Top