Why not, it happens to the pro life side all the time here. It's hardly that much of a misrepresentation when those same arguments are made in thread after thread.Just grossly misrepresent the pro-choice side, why don't we?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why not, it happens to the pro life side all the time here. It's hardly that much of a misrepresentation when those same arguments are made in thread after thread.Just grossly misrepresent the pro-choice side, why don't we?
Actually biologically the fetus is closer to a parasite in how the body responds to it, which is the cause of many pregnancy complications.
And nobody is saying that you have to have an abortion, but for the purposes of I did not intend to get pregnant and I do not want a baby now, for economic or any number of other reasons why should somebody other than myself make the decision for me in regards to a proceedure that has been done throughout recorded history, especially in these so called enlightened times where we guarantee liberty for all?
Don't want one, don't have one but as Tim says, "mind your own damn business."
If you ever paid attention you would already know I have said many times cases of rape, incest, mother life in danger, etc are an exception.Would you force a child to give birth to the child of her father?
From Axios:
Former President Trump said Thursday that an abortion limit banning the procedure after six weeks in Florida is "too short."The big picture: Trump, who has long boasted that he was the one who "was able to kill Roe v. Wade," has flip-flopped on his abortion stance, campaigning with a leave-it-to-the-states approach.
- Although he once indicated he favored a national abortion ban, the 2024 GOP presidential candidate announced in April that he believes the issue should be left up to states to decide.
Zoom in: Trump, a Florida resident, was asked in an interview with NBC News Thursday how he would vote on an abortion amendment on the ballot in his home state this NovemberAnd we still don't know how Trump will vote.
- The ballot measure, if passed, would nix the state's six-week ban and enshrine abortion access until fetal viability (around 24–28 weeks of pregnancy) in the state constitution.
- "I think the six week is too short, there has to be more time," Trump said. "I've told them I want more weeks."
- Without explicitly answering if he'll vote in favor of the measure, he said, "I am going to be voting that we need more than six weeks."
Not much of a misrepresentation? He was entirely misrepresenting the pro-choice crowd, stating blatant fantasies rather than facts, amd from a man who believes he has a claim over the body of a woman he made pregnant.Why not, it happens to the pro life side all the time here. It's hardly that much of a misrepresentation when those same arguments are made in thread after thread.
You just misrepresented him right there! Being hurt that your partner aborted your child behind your back and believing that he had the right to a say in the matter is hardly making a claim over her body. It does take two to make a baby, you know. In fact, pro-life people are constantly slandered as promoting "forced birth" without a shred of evidence. However, you see pro-choice people comparing babies in the womb to parasites all the time, including in this thread.Not much of a misrepresentation? He was entirely misrepresenting the pro-choice crowd, stating blatant fantasies rather than facts, amd from a man who believes he has a claim over the body of a woman he made pregnant.
Back in the early 70's my little brother was born premature around 25 weeks. Had something to do with the Rh factor(or whatever its called). I think he weighed like 1lb 8oz.I know someone who weighed 1 lb. 15 oz. when he was born prematurely, at about 24-25 weeks, iirc. He's a healthy teenager now.
What do you believe the cutoff should be for an elective abortion?
Back in the early 70's my little brother was born premature around 25 weeks. Had something to do with the Rh factor(or whatever its called). I think he weighed like 1lb 8oz.
He could easily fit in a shoe box. He is 50 now and doing well.
We got into this conversation because you completely disregards honesty when you put up propaganda claiming it is what half the people or the left think and feel. and here you are again making a dishonest claim about the left. SO we are back to the question I asked pages ago, and you ignored: Why do you feel the need to lie again and again about this?I already gave you a post.
It even said a fetus is ultimately seen as disposable.
A fetus is disposable
People are deplorable
That seems to be the way of the left.
I know someone who weighed 1 lb. 15 oz. when he was born prematurely, at about 24-25 weeks, iirc. He's a healthy teenager now.
What do you believe the cutoff should be for an elective abortion?
I would like to meet those women who in 2024 succeed in getting pregnant despite the dozens of kinds of contraceptives available.
In the country which is the first world power.
I would like to ask them how they do that.
And by the way...6 weeks may be a little too short...but 8 weeks seem to be totally fine.
We are not in the Stone Age any more.
And if his "say in the matter" was at odds with hers what then?You just misrepresented him right there! Being hurt that your partner aborted your child behind your back and believing that he had the right to a say in the matter is hardly making a claim over her body. It does take two to make a baby, you know. In fact, pro-life people are constantly slandered as promoting "forced birth" without a shred of evidence. However, you see pro-choice people comparing babies in the womb to parasites all the time, including in this thread.
"iirc"? Good.
... and given that you may not recall correctly?
... and given that the situation may be highly atypical?
... and given that you likely know little or nothing about the views if the medical personnel involved?
... and given that you likely know little or nothing concerning the physical and emotional health of the mother?
... and given that you likely know little or nothing about the extent and cost of required medical intervention?
... and given that you likely know little or nothing concerning the ability of the family to sustain those costs and emotional burdens?
I believe:
- that only a fool would render a judgement given a childishly flimsy anecdote, and
- that it would be egregious to presume that my judgment should trump that of the mother and the informed medical professionals.
I think the answer given was that it's not up to anyone but the people actually involved.I actually know quite a lot. Why do you assume otherwise?
Childishly flimsy? This it was about someone I know, but I'm not asking your 'judment' on that person, rather on elective abortions in general. If you don't have an answer, just say so.
I think the answer given was that it's not up to anyone but the people actually involved.
I've told this before I will make this a short version.
When I was in my early twentites I had a woman abort our child without telling me.
Six months later when we were talking about marriage she came clean.
It took both of us to make it, so IMO we both should have had a say about it.
Long story short, I walked away and never looked back.
I actually know quite a lot. Why do you assume otherwise?
Childishly flimsy? This it was about someone I know, but I'm not asking your 'judment' on that person, ...
... rather on elective abortions in general. If you don't have an answer, just say so.
We got into this conversation because you completely disregards honesty when you put up propaganda claiming it is what half the people or the left think and feel. and here you are again making a dishonest claim about the left. SO we are back to the question I asked pages ago, and you ignored: Why do you feel the need to lie again and again about this?
I never had the opportunity to have a say or choice. That's the point!And if his "say in the matter" was at odds with hers what then?