Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Now that finally, your fully aware of the dangers of compulsory mandate drivin policymaking, I suppose our enlightened politicians will stop this practice going foreword. No?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Trump promises "full pardons, apology" to Capitol rioters if elected.
- Thread starter Evangelicalhumanist
- Start date
Now that finally, your fully aware of the dangers of compulsory mandate drivin policymaking, I suppose our enlightened politicians will stop this practice going foreword. No?
Classic defence of psychopaths. “Look what you made me do”.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I think they view it as a defensive action from ever encroaching left wing authoritarianism that never seems to stop growing.
Some are obviously punching back now.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
What do you mean by "elective policy"? You might be asking something of the government that it does not need to do.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
And yet you can never name any such authoritarianism. You just don't like the government doing what it is supposed to do.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Only for you. Others have seen plentiful attackes on the bill of rights and amendments far back as 2016.
Democrats Attack 3 Of The 10 Amendments In The Bill Of Rights
Include the 8th on that list as well..
And there is no precedent for one in this case.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
If you want those that disagree with you to take you seriously you need to find reliable sources. This one is far right and has a mixed rating when it comes to reliability:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/investors-business-daily/
It looks as if all of that is rather old news too. Before Trump was elected. The Democrats had a sit in about limiting those on the no fly list from buying guns. This one was a bit of a stretch
The second was about trying to find a way to curb America's sick love affair with guns. Both of these were probably due to the Las Vegas mass murder. This was not unreasonable.
The third was about trying to find a way to keep big business from controlling the government. Okay, you are right there. That was going too far!
Last edited:
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Oh yea.. ;0]
Only reliable for your interests. All others are obviously useless.
News flash. I will continue pick the sources I want to pick.
It's not my problem if you deny and reject anything and everything that dosent conform to your personal worldview.
PureX
Veteran Member
Classic fascist talking point ... "the rule of law only applies to our enemies". "Not to us".
But in this case of executive privilege he doesn’t have any,he’s plain mr Trump and all the documents have been studied and separated by the executive division plus there is no precedent for one in this case as I see it.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No Reliable for all. To get the MIXED or lower ratings they have to be able to show that the sites are demonstrably wrong several times.
If sites like that are not unbiased themselves they lose money. It is in their own self interest to be as neutral as possible.
Now you have gone off into conspiracy theory. Not a good sign.
And when it comes to you continuing to pick lunatic right sites we will continue to laugh at you when you make yourself look foolish by doing so.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Expected response as usual. *yawn*
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I know. You find reality boring. Why aren't you a creationist? You are arguing exactly like one right now.
OK... so, what you are saying is 105 a term is ok but 143 isn't... which the line so I can make sure I write to them at that point and say "stop"?
stvdv
Veteran Member
Sometimes true if said to their parents
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
One has to look at motivations of pardons. Trump pardoned a high percentage of the criminals that supported him. They broke real laws. They were justly sentenced. I am sure that there are some questionable pardons by Obama, but generally his and those of other Presidents were examples of miscarriages of justice. Though I will not agree with all of his pardons either.
I would agree that all presidents do it and that all pardon criminals.Even Obama:
1. James Robert Adelman
Adelman of Tulsa, Oklahoma, was convicted of conspiracy to embezzle by a trustee, embezzlement by a trustee, and making a false account in 1989. He was sentenced to 12 years in prison and ordered to pay $350,000 in restitution.
2. Octavio Joaquin Armenteros
Armenteros of Jacksonville, Florida, was convicted of intent to possess and distribute cocaine. He was sentenced to 46 months' imprisonment with three years' supervised release in 1995.