• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump promises "full pardons, apology" to Capitol rioters if elected.

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
This is a very difficult job for a special master. He or she might need a rather high security clearance. Plus the special master would have to able to close their eyes to other crimes that were not included in the search warrant. It is not a job that I would want.
Security clearances aren't a problem.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
But in this case of executive privilege he doesn’t have any,he’s plain mr Trump and all the documents have been studied and separated by the executive division plus there is no precedent for one in this case as I see it.
Trump has some major privilege afforded ex-Presidents who committed crimes. De facto can be more powerful than de juro.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
OK... so, what you are saying is 105 a term is ok but 143 isn't... which the line so I can make sure I write to them at that point and say "stop"?
Trump shouldn't have pardoned so many people because now he will have fewer friends on the inside. Gotta think ahead.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Trump shouldn't have pardoned so many people because now he will have fewer friends on the inside. Gotta think ahead.
You think he'll actually spend time in prison?
I'll bet he never sees a day inside.
I hope I'm wrong.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You think he'll actually spend time in prison?
I'll bet he never sees a day inside.
I hope I'm wrong.
You are probably right. In a jury trial it would be very hard to convict him. It would take only one Trumpista to get a hung jury. Part of the reason that he has not been indicted yet is because it would be very difficult to have a good chance of convicting him. We have seen it here when it comes to denying the obvious by so many supporters of his.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
You think he'll actually spend time in prison?
I'll bet he never sees a day inside.
I hope I'm wrong.
We can't expect him to find competent legal representation, so the odds are against him at every level. But he will find someone who can slow down the process and he will likely not live long enough to see a sentencing. Regardless of his fate he is ruined and going down little by little. I think he is aware what he is. The guy knows how to create drama, and this is free entertainment at his peril. No matter what, he's not going to win anything ever again.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
You are probably right. In a jury trial it would be very hard to convict him. It would take only one Trumpista to get a hung jury. Part of the reason that he has not been indicted yet is because it would be very difficult to have a good chance of convicting him. We have seen it here when it comes to denying the obvious by so many supporters of his.
If the prosecutor charges him with crimes facing
1 year or less in prison, the judge can unilaterally
waive his right to a jury trial under the Petty
Offense Doctrine. (SCOTUS gutted the right to
a jury trial some time ago.) A bench trial would
be more likely to achieve justice.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
We can't expect him to find competent legal representation, so the odds are against him at every level.
Trump will certainly be able to find competent representation.
Just perhaps not the ones he'd first have in mind. (He tends
to burn his bridges.) The important thing for Trump is to find
unethical lawyers who'll use every corrupt trick in the book.
And such malefactors abound.
Better-Call-Saul.jpg
 
Last edited:

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
If the prosecutor charges him with crimes facing
1 year or less in prison, the judge can unilaterally
waive his right to a jury trial under the Petty
Offense Doctrine. (SCOTUS gutted the right to
a jury trial some time ago.) A bench trial would
be more likely to achieve justice.
A link would be nice. I am not seeing that. For something that has no jail time I see ould agree. But misdemeanors appear to qualify for a jury trial.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Last edited:
Top