Argentbear
Well-Known Member
Do you have any evidence that either of the juries were biased?There are such things as bias courts you know.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Do you have any evidence that either of the juries were biased?There are such things as bias courts you know.
There are such things as bias courts you know.
Does that mean I am supposed to believe her?
No, that is irrelevant as he was convicted by a jury.
That must be it.There are such things as bias courts you know.
Well maybe it's time for people to go treasure hunting like they are usually do in situations like this.Trump has already lost in court over this.
Apparently he has not lost enough money over it.
Depends upon appeals and when the fat lady sings.That must be it.
I mean, no way Trump is guilty as charged, right?
No need to go hunting.Well maybe it's time for people to go treasure hunting like they are usually do in situations like this.
Thats the spirit.Depends upon appeals and when the fat lady sings.
There are at least three truths.Checkmate.
The judicial truth is not the historical truth.Well, so far what you said about Odessa is not the truth. It is at best secondary hearsay. And thus it needs more to become truth in a court of law.
The judicial truth is not the historical truth.
What reason do you have to think the judge and two different juries were biased?There are such things as bias courts you know.
Do you know the expression "it's her word against his"?
You need to provide with evidence...especially if you just say the year and not the day of the month.
I can also say that in 1998 I was raped by Leonardo Di Caprio...but I don't recall the exact day...it was Summer.
I thought you claimed to be a "jurist" some time ago. Do you understand how a jury trial works in the United States?Does that mean I am supposed to believe her?
Cool.There are at least three truths.
The historical truth.
The judicial truth.
The media truth.
His lawyers had as many peremptory challenges as hers.There are such things as bias courts you know.
Trump has the right to speak his mind in this country weather one wants to believe it or not.
You seem to have forgotten the MAGA Mantra:His lawyers had as many peremptory challenges as hers.
I know. If everything were fair, Trump would win all the world's lotteries (even the free tickets), 100% of all sports bets, and be President or Prime Minisiter of every country on earth. Not only that, all corporations in the world would have gone bankrupt only to be saved by Trump so that he was sole propietor of all business in the Solar System.You seem to have forgotten the MAGA Mantra:
"Trump Lost? It Had To Be Rigged"
If only Trump would limit his talking to about the weather.Trump has the right to speak his mind in this country weather one wants to believe it or not.
Nobody said he couldn't. Scrutiny isn't Censorship. His critics have a right to speak their minds as well.Trump has the right to speak his mind in this country weather one wants to believe it or not.