• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump Slams His Attorneys Then Spends 45 Minutes Defaming E. Jean Carrol AGAIN, and Her Witnesses.

Daemon Sophic

Daemon Sophic

Avatar in flux
I'm not so sure that the old man tRump WANTS to get sued again (which he most righteously will be). I think its more a matter of his senility and mental pathology just not letting him say anything beyond what leaps into his brain's vocal control centers, at this particular moment. He is adrift in a world that swirls around his fogey old self, faster than he can hope to ever catch up to, and he has zero self-control. :shrug:
 
Kathryn

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Jayhawker Soule said:
Absolutely correct. It is also true that his Basket of Deplorables have every right to embrace his narcissistic misogyny and pathological lies. It is, however, disgusting to see folks enthusiastically exercise that right.
Click to expand...
LOL you said "basket of deplorables."
 
W

wellwisher

Well-Known Member
Argentbear said:
the legal definition of slander is the action or crime of making a false spoken statement damaging to a person's reputation. That definition doens't change just because of who the perpetrator of slander is.
Click to expand...
Does than also apply to fake news? Should Trump be able to sue for the Russian Collusion slander? The slandered tries to make him look like a traitor and harm his livelihood. I was debunked. It was done more than once in a very public arena by every fake news station.

The case with E Jean Carrol is not about rape or assault since those two charges were already settled in previous cases. It was about her claiming slander, for slandering Trump about rape and assault, and not getting the result she wanted in Court. By her not winning, she thinks looks bad and she is blaming Trump for making her look bad, by her original slander not sticking in court. It is a female brain thing that only a Liberal understands. It went over in NY.

This part three E Jean Carrol, only came to trial because Trump decided to run again. They could have done it three years ago. But it was stage to be election interference, which it is why it under appeal. It will not damage Trump since it smells like DNC law fare. If they had done it sooner they may have got away with it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top