• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump Slams His Attorneys Then Spends 45 Minutes Defaming E. Jean Carrol AGAIN, and Her Witnesses.

We Never Know

No Slack
I know you just gave more credibility to those who say you aren't interested in good faith discussions and debates.

Dont like it, dont do it.
It's actually a basic human need. There is no shortage of research and studies showing we do better with a support system. This is because we are social animals.

You want a cookie?

Some good advice for you is actually listen to what people are saying. Pain? Motivation? Choice? You aren't even close to what I'm saying.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Just calling you out on your projection and hypocrisy. Nothing desperate about that. You became a rape apologist out of political bias and blind loyalty. You sacrificed your moral compass upon the MAGA altar.
Having doubts doesn't make any one a rape apologist.

Unless you are 100% sure, which you can't be unless you were there, you have to have some doubt too. But your hate and bias makes you think you are 100%.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
Having doubts doesn't make any one a rape apologist.

Unless you are 100% sure, which you can't be unless you were there, you have to have some doubt too. But your hate and bias makes you think you are 100%.

I can have doubts and admit it. I don't know what happen and it could be correct or not. But that is irrelevant, because it doesn't depend on you or I having doubt or not.
And a verdict does not require 100%. That is on you as something you have add on your own.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
I'm not the one who insisted that another would believe a lie.

Then answer the questions.

If Carroll came forward and said she lied would still believe Trump sexually assaulted her?
Would you then publically say Trump is innocent?
Or
Would claim Trump manipulated her in some way to get her to change her story?
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
I don't understand why you claim many of the things you claim.
So I am supposed to believe that in 1996 Trump had the idea to go to a store with this woman...and tried to rape her in a dressing room, and no shopkeeper, no security guard saw anything.
Yes sure... and I am Miss Italy.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Difference is mine is true. Many would claim she was coerced.
Are you really claiming Trump's worshipers don't perform mental gymnastics to defend Trump for each and every thing he's accused of, regardless of damning evidence? Really? And you really don't find it disturbing that people crawl on their bellies to lick the boots of some politician as if they were some sort of infallible messiah figure beyond reproach? Really?
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
Lol.

If she said she lied, that he didn't do it, that makes him innocent regardless of the verdict which would soon be changed.
You understand how that works don't you?

No, it would require another trial or something to that effect to declare him innocent. Not what you say or don't say, that is irrelevant unless you are judge in that case.
 
Top