• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump Slams His Attorneys Then Spends 45 Minutes Defaming E. Jean Carrol AGAIN, and Her Witnesses.

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
So I am supposed to believe that in 1996 Trump had the idea to go to a store with this woman...and tried to rape her in a dressing room, and no shopkeeper, no security guard saw anything.
Yes sure... and I am Miss Italy.
Have you ever visited a department store? You have cashiers by the registers, perhaps associates stocking shelfs with merchandise, and maybe an asset protection guy watching cameras (and there would obviously be none in the dressing rooms) for shop lifters. Even if there were security guards (most stores don't have them unless in high crime ghettos) there are a whole lot of departments to patrol. You're bending over backwards and performing mental gymnastics to defend a guy with a loooong history of sexual misconduct. He was Epstein's bestie and he evening admitted to assaulting women ("grab them by the *****"). The man is trash.

 
Last edited:

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Then answer the questions.

If Carroll came forward and said she lied would still believe Trump sexually assaulted her?
Would you then publically say Trump is innocent?
Or
Would claim Trump manipulated her in some way to get her to change her story?
Or I don't answer.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Having doubts doesn't make any one a rape apologist.

Unless you are 100% sure, which you can't be unless you were there, you have to have some doubt too. But your hate and bias makes you think you are 100%.
It does if doubts are based solely on partisanship loyalty, and when libeling the victim. "My Trumpy Wumpy can do no wrong, and I refuse to believe otherwise!"
 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
Have you ever visited a department store? You have cashiers by the registers, perhaps associates stocking shelfs with merchandise, and maybe a asset protection guy watching cameras (and there would obviously be none in the dressing rooms) for shop lifters. Even if there were security guards (most stores don't have them unless in high crime ghettos) there are a whole lot of departments to patrol. You're bending over backwards and performing mental gymnastics to defend a guy with a loooong history of sexual misconduct. He was Epstein's bestie and he evening admitted to assaulting women ("grab them by the *****"). The man is trash.

Italy is a very permissive society, they don't have dressing rooms, people disrobe in public. :rolleyes:
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Italy is a very permissive society, they don't have dressing rooms, people disrobe in public. :rolleyes:
I mean...in my country it's women who chase billionaires...not the other way around.
So that is why the story is hardly credible.

And by the way... shop assistants and shopkeepers would never allow a woman to enter in the dressing room with a man.
 
Last edited:

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Shop assistants and shopkeepers aren't omnipotent.
Even in the largest department store...there will always be shop assistants monitoring all customers, and to ensure women's safety, they would never allow men to enter the same dressing room as a woman.
;)
So...I have many many doubts...
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
Even in the largest department store...there will always be shop assistants monitoring all customers, and to ensure women's safety, they would never allow men to enter the same dressing room as a woman.
;)
So...I have many many doubts...

That is not true in my town for at least one store.
And I have entered a dressing room to watch what my wife was trying on.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
That is not true in my town for at least one store.
And I have entered a dressing room to watch what my wife was trying on.
Yes, but we are speaking of NYC.
If that department store in question testifies that in 1996 that would have been possible, I would have fewer doubts.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Even in the largest department store...there will always be shop assistants monitoring all customers, and to ensure women's safety, they would never allow men to enter the same dressing room as a woman.
;)
So...I have many many doubts...
So to answer my earlier question, you've never actually been in a department store.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
Yes, but we are speaking of NYC.
If that department store in question testifies that in 1996 that would have been possible, I would have fewer doubts.

Well, have you read the actual transcript of the trials and what witnesses the defense brought? Further you don't know if as the trial happened in NY, what people partaking in the trials knew as common knowledge and thus it wasn't a relevant defense.

So I don't know one way or another. And neither do you.
 
Top