I saw a meme after the second Carroll judgement that said she grabbed him by the pursey.Seems as though he is gonna need an even bigger hit to his purse...
The jury believed her. That's what matters.Do you know the expression "it's her word against his"?
It doesn't matter what anybody but the jury (and maybe the trial and appellate judges) believes.Does that mean I am supposed to believe her?
Nobody can stop him, but he can be made to pay a price for some of it. He'll probably have to pay Carroll, and he may well pay for some of the things he said during the porn star hush money coverup trial, and I don't mean the measly $10,000 in fines Judge Merchan imposed for the gag order violations.Trump has the right to speak his mind in this country weather one wants to believe it or not.
That combined with Trump's stochastic terrorism directed at the judge and his family may land him in prison before the second criminal trial begins if they ever get around to sentencing him.
Yes, many people do hate him, but it's his attorney's job to make sure than none appear in his jury, and there is no evidence that the jury wasn't fair and impartial.they have a bias target that they absolutely hate.
There are a few good reasons to not have people hate you. They might key your car or kill your dog. Trump had been largely sheltered from the consequences of that hatred until he entered politics (one can only imagine how many people hate him for stiffing them and what property damage the did to him for revenge, but that wouldn't matter to him).
Not anymore. Now he has to worry about judges, juries, prominent non-MAGA Republicans like the Cheneys and The Lincoln Project, and voters that hate him.
What's a bias court? Did you mean biased judges and juries like those all white Southern juries that convicted Black defendants for being Black? That can happen, but in general, the risk is of a single biased juror, like a MAGA getting past voir dire and hanging an otherwise unanimous jury.There are such things as bias courts you know.
Yet the jury was convinced anyway - unanimously.Damning my ***. Lol. Nobody has a single shread of evidence to show for it.
You don't seem to understand how Trump's mouth hurts him. He is known as a liar (fact checking confirms that) and a sexual predator (his words about grabbing women by the genital and his incursions into the dressing room of young female beauty contest contestants probably hurt him and his credibility in this case)
No argument here, and that's just the beginning. He's long been an antisocial malignant narcissist and pathological liar. Now, he's rapidly succumbing to dementia and suffering loss of impulse control as we see in this case, which is an incredibly dangerous combination for him.Trump is mentally poor and unstable. Right?
And some men rape women. The jury thought that it was the latter.Some women do all they can to get powerful men to help their career, popularity, what they want, etc. and or including sleeping with them.
If Trump was lied about and falsely convicted, he has nobody to blame but himself for making the claim credible.Would a woman whose career has ran its course lie about a rich man? There are $80 million reasons why.
Probably not, but did his brother brag about sexual predation? There's the problem with making comments like that. It's why you never say even in jest that you want somebody dead. Somebody else who wants them dead as well might overhear it and kill who you said aloud you wanted dead.If it had been your brother that she claimed raped her 30 years ago and the only evidence was she said she said and one picture of your brother and her 10 years prior to said rape .. Would you accept it all with no doubts?
No. If she said she lied, I'd believer her unless there was evidence that she was coerced to say it. You don't understand how people like me make judgments. It's not the bigoted, biased way that you and others suggest. There are people who care about the truth.Even if Carroll came forward and said she lied you would still believe Trump sexually assaulted her.
He is able if he can find an attorney to file such a suit, but I doubt that he wants that matter to be subjected to a microscopic examination. He escaped accountability due to a sympathetic special prosecutor, his boss, and a sympathetic Attorney General. He doesn't have that any more..Should Trump be able to sue for the Russian Collusion slander?
The only election interference comes from Republicans, and Trump and many others have been indicated for it in federal courts and multiple state level courts. There has been no known election interference in the 2024 election to date. Trump is not the election; he's just a candidate, which gives him no immunity to prosecution.But it was stage to be election interference, which it is why it under appeal.