• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump Wants to Talk About **** Size

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I'm not worried about Trump doing anything except inspiring more people to lose dignity and honor. I'm worried about the young and ambitious people who take his rhetoric seriously, and will use the power they are given to make it happen. You tell me how Congress will control the administration. Or the Judicial branch who allowed the immunity in the first place. MAGA will control the DOJ, and what do you think the worst of them are willing to do to you or anyone else?

We have testimony from former Trump administration officials who revealed how often Trump wanted to do illegal or unconstitutional things, and the only reason they didn't happen was the ethics of those officials. They will be gone. Trump will do whatever he wants and let the other branches of government respond after the fact. We can't assume to trust the criminal candidate in any way. He's owed nothing.
No question....Trump is bad news.
Take solace in the fact that he's also rather incompetent.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
Tis better to consider the range of possible outcomes,
& the relative probability of each. Your way leads only
to scampering about, & panicking about the impending
falling sky. To think is better than to emote.
Quite the contrary. Can you think of a scenario where being unprepared is an advantage? Being unprepared is what leads to panic. If Trump wins there will be 2 and a half months to prepare.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Can you think of a scenario where being unprepared
Who said we should be unprepared?
Your agonizing over the worst case scenario
isn't preparation for anything. Tis merely
fretful hand wringing.

What measures would you actually
take to prepare for Trump's 2nd act?
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
Who said we should be unprepared?
Your agonizing over the worst case scenario
isn't preparation for anything. Tis merely
fretful hand wringing.
You’re exaggerating. I’m simply saying we have to assume the worst case scenario, and that means we have to mentally prepare. I saw the Jimmy Kimmel interview with Joe Scarborough. And he said a lot that I relate to. He’s a huge critic of Trump and recognizes that he’s dangerous. He admitted that he’s preparing mentally for a Trump win. He says he’s not ready.

I’m a white male so probably the most protected. But I’m still part of a society that is stable and enjoys those advantages. I’m pondering what effects Trump’s agendas could do to many citizens that will affect me. Imagine a Trump administration canceling the media credentials of the major networks. It all seems unlikely but would we be surprised? We could see threats to the networks to not broadcast any criticisms of Trump.

What measures would you actually
take to prepare for Trump's 2nd act?
I was hoping to get my Missouri house finished and sold before the election but it will be sometime next year. I’ll have anxiety about the housing market and the economy if Trump wins. If he does I doubt his bad ideas will have a huge effect until 2026.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Quite the contrary. Can you think of a scenario where being unprepared is an advantage? Being unprepared is what leads to panic. If Trump wins there will be 2 and a half months to prepare.
I have serious doubts that Trump, even if he wins, will last mentally until the inauguration. His dementia appears to be advancing at an increasing rate. Perhaps it is due to the strain of campaigning. He is regularly cancelling events. It was first just refusing to debate. Then he began to cancel on interviews that were not friendly. Now he has been even canceling pro-Trump events. He is saving his fading abilities for rallies and even those have periods of low energy rambling where he slurs his words and loses track of the point that he was trying to make.

A vote for Trump is in reality a vote for Vance.
 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
No.
You're mis-interpreting, with the
false claim that I oppose preparation
for expected changes.
Preparing for scenarios is a good idea and contrary to Trump's response to pandemic preparations that Trump thought were not worthwhile, but actually operating as if the worst case is occuring is not worthwhile, I think we all agree on this, we are just not quite saying it in the same way and just what are appropriate preparations. For example I am not going to buy Patriot Batteries with their AC recharger to protect against the Utility grid failing.
 

Copernicus

Industrial Strength Linguist
If removed, then Vance seizes power.
Is that better?

For Peter Thiel, his billionaire mentor and patron, it is. I think that Musk would prefer to keep Trump around, because Trump responds positively to bribes and flattery. I wouldn't be surprised if the Silicon Valley pro-Trumpers have it in mind to find a way to sideline Trump. Vance, at least, is less capricious, and he is just a poor boy with a few million dollars in wealth right now. He is someone they know. Trump is an outsider.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Preparing for scenarios is a good idea and contrary to Trump's response to pandemic preparations that Trump thought were not worthwhile, but actually operating as if the worst case is occuring is not worthwhile, I think we all agree on this, we are just not quite saying it in the same way and just what are appropriate preparations. For example I am not going to buy Patriot Batteries with their AC recharger to protect against the Utility grid failing.
I don't plan to curb my spending just cuz
Trump plans to cut Social Security benefits.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I don't plan to curb my spending just cuz
Trump plans to cut Social Security benefits.
I am cheap and could probably survive for the rest of my life without SS. Between my house and my modest portfolio I have enough for a comfortable though far from wealthy retirement. But since I paid in over my lifetime I am not about to reject the money that I get in SS.
So Trump screwing up SS might harm me. It would not threaten my existence.
 

Copernicus

Industrial Strength Linguist
If Trump's wackadoodle extremist economic policies manage to trigger a steep recession or depression, I doubt that many of us will make out well. Trump has even suggested a return to the gold standard, which is favored in Project 2025. He has flirted with the idea in the past.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I am cheap and could probably survive for the rest of my life without SS. Between my house and my modest portfolio I have enough for a comfortable though far from wealthy retirement. But since I paid in over my lifetime I am not about to reject the money that I get in SS.
So Trump screwing up SS might harm me. It would not threaten my existence.
Same here.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Do you think that it really takes a medical professional to spot that? I have worked with the elderly some of which we victims of dementia. Granted, they were all at a more advanced stage than Trump.
It takes a proper accessment or all you have is what you see on TV. If you ask me it's not dementia but him just saying stuff amd making things up, like how we know for sure Vance is given his own admission.
 
Top