TurkeyOnRye
Well-Known Member
With the national debt at 19 trillion dollars, how on earth could the US afford to utilize tax brackets like this? Is it just me, or does this strike anyone else as insane?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Eliminate personal deductions, & maybe it will work.With the national debt at 19 trillion dollars, how on earth could the US afford to utilize tax brackets like this? Is it just me, or does this strike anyone else as insane?
Eliminate personal deductions, & maybe it will work.
But I still think his capital gains tax is as wrong as the current system......
- There are different capital gains tax rates for different classes of assets.
They should all be the same.
- They should all be indexed for inflation, so that no one pays tax on the loss of value of the dollar,
ie, it takes more dollars in today's money to equal the economic value of dollars back in the day.
- It should (IMO) be taxed at the ordinary income tax rate.
- Capital losses should be deductable against ordinary income.
Long term capital gains only gets a break for some classes of assets, eg, stocks, real estate.From donaldjtrump.com: "With this huge reduction in rates, many of the current exemptions and deductions will become unnecessary or redundant. Those within the 10% bracket will keep all or most of their current deductions. Those within the 20% bracket will keep more than half of their current deductions. Those within the 25% bracket will keep fewer deductions. Charitable giving and mortgage interest deductions will remain unchanged for all taxpayers."
Does this mean you think we should eliminate the tax break on long-term capital gains? I would agree that we should tax it like regular income.
I didn't see that strategy in the link.Trump is lying through his teeth or maybe telling the truth when he said he would borrow and borrow and default on the national debt.
He did not actually say default but take less than what they're owed - I mis-remembered it. and it was back in May chrome://ietab2/content/reloaded.html?url=http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/07/u...tional-debt-get-creditors-to-accept-less.html and other sites.I didn't see that strategy in the link.
Where is it posted?
We should consider that Trump is proposing nothing terribly new.He did not actually say default but take less than what they're owed - I mis-remembered it. and it was back in May chrome://ietab2/content/reloaded.html?url=http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/07/u...tional-debt-get-creditors-to-accept-less.html and other sites.
Fortunately I'm voting for Hillary and against the tool-of-the-devil small hands donny .We should consider that Trump is proposing nothing terribly new.
The difference is that he admits it openly, & proposes something more direct.
US gov policy has been erasing debt by expanding the money supply faster than economic growth, thereby devaluing the dollar.
Only once did I ever hear a gov official admit the intentional policy of yearly currency devaluation, aka "inflation".
What does this mean?
That I will hold me nose to ward off the stench of voting for The Donald as a means of keeping the Hildabeast out of office.
Knowing that dogs like to sniff the butts of other dogs, I expect you'll have no difficulty!Fortunately I'm voting for Hillary and against the tool-of-the-devil small hands donny .