What next, are you going to ask what they were wearing?
I would if the supposed rape happened recently and what she wore when it happened may still contain evidence of the crime.
Yes.
Also - if her outfit may help us find potential witnesses to seeing her with her alleged rapist either before or after the crime was committed.
Some people may remember an outfit over a face.
So - yes again.
Not if you understand such things, no, it's not suspicious at all.
I was raped when I was 13. I didn't tell anyone about it until I was twenty, because I was ashamed, too embarrassed and shy to talk about it, and when I did tell someone, they didn't believe me, and in fact, they made me feel like it was my fault. So I didn't tell anyone else about it, because I felt even more embarrassed than I did in the first place. I couldn't even imagine having to face the guy in court and give testimony while he stared at me and while his lawyer tried to tear me down. Countless other women have experienced the exact. Same. Thing. Please stop with these lame excuses meant to protect sexual predators and vilify victims.
Again - sorry for what happened to you - but aren't you basically admitting that you regret not doing more immediately after the crime took place?
I believe that if you had told people right after it happened - you would have been better off and there would have been more evidence against your rapist.
I think instead of encouraging women to wait decades before crying rape - we should be teaching them to do it immediately and with extreme prejudice.
Because if you tell people that it is okay to accuse others of crimes many years after the fact - with no evidence - and the world will believe you without any sort of due process - the person you accused will have their lives destroyed - that's a system ripe for abuse.
And there are many examples of false rape accusations out there where the accused lost everything.
If you have children - teach them to speak up if anything happens to them.
You've heard of the MeToo movement, right? You should pay closer attention to what it's all about.
I believe that most of that movement was garbage.
Because - on one hand - you have women in these industries who believe that sex is just a transaction and they were willing to exchange their bodies for movie roles or jobs or promotions.
And then you have actual victims.
However - that movement equated the two - and I felt that that was wrong.
I was telling you to wake up.
Nothing in that transcript suggested that anything he did was without consent.
Whores exist. They chase money and fame - and Trump had all that.
I guess you weren't paying attention then.
You see?
Since you are okay with women accusing men of rape decades later with no evidence - and you fully support convicting those men in the court of public opinion with no due process - you feel comfortable claiming that people are racist with no evidence.
It's like a disease. You don't believe that one man deserves to have rights afforded to others - based on the fact that you don't like them - but soon you are making claims about everyone without evidence - and it spreads.
Provide evidence of President Trump's racism.
On the other hand, you think his disgusting bragging about molesting women was a-ok so ...
No - I don't.
Like you - I think it was arrogant and entitled - totally gross. I have never done it and I won't ever do it.
However - what I am saying is that his bragging about his sexual conquests is not evidence of rape or sexual assault.
It just isn't.
I'm around men all the time. I've heard locker room talk.
What Trump said is not locker room talk.
I don't think men are going to completely open up to a woman about their sexual exploits.
And - sorry - but you don't have the authority to declare what is or is not "locker room talk".
Well, he was running for President so perhaps somebody wanted to expose the truth about his attitudes before that happened.
What attitudes? That he is attracted to women and he believed that because he was a "star" that they would "let" him do things to them?
If that was all they wanted to "expose" - then they were late to the party - because everyone already knew that.
No - they brought out this recording so they could falsely accuse him of rape and sexual assault with no evidence.
I don't see what is weird about that.
I know you are okay with accusing men of crimes without evidence and having them convicted by the court of public opinion.
We have been over that already.
If I saw my rapist running for President I would certainly say something.
But he was Donald Trump.
He has been in the public spotlight his entire life.
Ample time and opportunity to accuse him.
It's not like they forgot about him until he was coming down that escalator.
Ridiculous.
There is also tape from a Howard Stern Show he did a few years back where he talks about intentionally walking into the changing room of the Miss Teen Universe pageant where TEENAGED girls were changing and thinking they're safe and alone. He bragged about it, like it wasn't disgusting behaviour. You cool with that too?
Show me the tape.
Do you think Leo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt sit around bragging about how they touch women without their consent?
First - President Trump never claimed that he didn't have their consent - he said "let".
Second - I have no idea what either of those actors talk about.
FYI Dude, touching someone without their consent in a sexual way is sexual assault.
Yeah - that is what we have been talking about.
It's still not relevant to what President Trump said.
Whoa, when did I say I don't believe in either of those things?
You have been saying it all throughout this discussion.
If you overheard your brother telling his friends, "Bro - I had sex with this girl - she let me do anything I wanted."
You would automatically assume that he was describing himself committing rape or sexual assault?
As if men openly brag to their friends about the crimes they have committed?
And you have repeatedly claimed that President Trump did these awful things without evidence.
So - yeah - I stick by what I said - you assume the worst of people you don't like and you don't believe in due process of law.
There is no assumption required here. Trump's own words speak for themselves. Then there are the 20+ women who have corroborated his very own words and actions. There is enough evidence to take his word for it, when he brags about assaulting women.
Well - considering that that recording has been available for decades - literally any woman in the world could "corroborate" what he said.
And he never claimed that he did anything without the consent of the women.
None of this is evidence that he committed any crime. Sorry.
I mean - I could claim right now that I have raped a hundred women - that doesn't mean that I did.
And let's say someone recorded me claiming that I raped a bunch of women and it got distributed to the entire country.
At that point - any woman could come claiming that I raped them - couldn't they?
Unless you have evidence or a confession to a specific crime - you got nothing.
I looked - but still saw no evidence.
And some also conveniently forget [not you] that Trump was convicted of campaign violations and was fined. 
"
