I'll just ask it:
Existentialists: Why are you voting Truth over comfort?
Existentialists: Why are you voting Truth over comfort?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'll just ask it:
Existentialists: Why are you voting Truth over comfort?
Creating a meaning in life is not denying that there is no objective meaning. It is simply something to do.I'll just ask it:
Existentialists: Why are you voting Truth over comfort?
I dont believe in an afterlife and I find that quite discomforting. But I cannot choose to pretend like an afterlife make sense to me, because it doesnt.I find that this is presented as an either-or quite perplexing. Seems to me those who pick an answer like "truth" are doing so because holding onto this supposed "truth" is a comfort. No human holds beliefs which cause cognitive dissonance (discomfort) for them, at least not over long periods of time. Calling their ideas "truth" is a way of resolving that discomfort with the illusion of certainty. People accept what is "true" because they find it comfortable.
I dont believe in an afterlife and I find that quite discomforting. But I cannot choose to pretend like an afterlife make sense to me, because it doesnt.
I know . I am just not there yet, and I am not going to start believing in an afterlife just for comfort.Acceptance Of Death
Kübler-Ross model - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Acceptance can make it much more easier.
Are you talking about belief? Because belief points to what is true, not what is comfortable. "What you tell yourself" doesn't a belief make.If it came down to it, would you rather accept what is true or something that is comfortable? For example, say that all logic and evidence points to there being no afterlife. Will you accept that this life is it (truth) or would you continue telling yourself you will go to paradise after you die (comfort)?
That's because they know the truth.Existentialists believe comfort is better.
I'll just ask it:
Existentialists: Why are you voting Truth over comfort?
Ever read Camus? You know books like The Myth of Sisyphus or The Rebel?
Camus rejected the label of existentialism but most think of him as one. I still see Camus as trying to find a way out. So I am with The Sum of Awe on this one.
Hmmmmmm, no meaning, no order, uncaring universe, complete isolation, complete responsibility for every action... Can you please point out the comfort?
complete responsibility for every action...therefore your destiny and the meaning of your life is in your own hands. It's all up to you. That's comforting.
The capacity and responsibility of free individuals to make themselves available to the mystery of their participation in creation, in particular by responding to the appeal of the mystery.Well then I ask you the same thing. What is comforting in accepting that life is meaningless, that we are technically all completely alone, life is absurd, there is no loving force in this uncaring universe, that we are responsible for who we are and for every single thing we do and choice we make? I am really interested to know how you find it comforting.
Who I am is up to me. Nothing else. That is hardly "all".
The capacity and responsibility of free individuals to make themselves available to the mystery of their participation in creation, in particular by responding to the appeal of the mystery.
Pretty much what Cynthia said.Care to elaborate?
Hmmmmmm, no meaning, no order, uncaring universe, complete isolation, complete responsibility for every action... Can you please point out the comfort?