Francine
Well-Known Member
Ideas which work consistently can be used to make correct predictions, and we say they are true. Truth is the way things are. The truth of an assertion does not rest on the asserter's goodness, but it is incumbent upon the asserter to make his case, not the skeptic to falsify the case. If the asserter tries to use his desired outcome as a premise, he hasn't made his case. The number of people who believe in something has nothing to do with its truth value. It is not valid to plea, "Einstein was a genius and he believed in God," and if you ask, "have you stopped beating your wife?" you are really asking two questions. General rules cannot always be validly applied to specific cases, and a few specific cases cannot be used to form a general rule. Events which occur together in time (like taking an aspirin, praying to God, and being relieved of a headache) may not all be causally related.