I've been following this thread all the way through and I don't know why you all still bother. You guys are trying to challenge someone who is so stubborn in their ways that they cannot even fathom the idea of being proven wrong and who clearly doesn't understand the idea of using any evidence outside of religious scripture. Neither of you are going to be able to get through this kind of mindset, and while I find it just as ridiculous as you do, no one will ever see any results for their efforts unfortunately.
Faith is defined as "strong belief in God or in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual apprehension rather than proof" whereas truth is defined as "that which is in accordance with fact or reality." For something to be truth it needs to be proven true, whereas faith does not. The two by definition do not go together.
Jabar, you have to understand that there are people who do not view your (or any) religious scripture as valid or truthful. You may believe they are wrong but if you want them to take you seriously and if you want to prove your point you need to use evidence from sources they accept. Just like they try to use scriptures to reason with you because that is what you accept, you need to use research to reason with them because that is what they accept.
As far as saying it is complete truth, how do you prove the biggest part; that there is one god? It may contain all the true science in the world but neither you, nor anyone, can objectively prove that there is one god. If someone does not believe in one god, nothing will be able to convince them that it is divine and completely true because that part cannot be proven.
I just have to point out that these are the kind of things that we cannot do. We can't go claiming that our beliefs are objectively true, that is considered preaching, and we can't demean or insult people. This is just a little reminder to remember the rules.
I have faith because of truth.
Faith is defined as "strong belief in God or in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual apprehension rather than proof" whereas truth is defined as "that which is in accordance with fact or reality." For something to be truth it needs to be proven true, whereas faith does not. The two by definition do not go together.
I am sick and tired of giving evidence to you all the dang time and you downright say i do not provide evidence.
Qur'an being divine obviously does not tell lies, which is why i give you a taste of your own medicine to prove it is divine. Something divine does not tell lies.
Jabar, you have to understand that there are people who do not view your (or any) religious scripture as valid or truthful. You may believe they are wrong but if you want them to take you seriously and if you want to prove your point you need to use evidence from sources they accept. Just like they try to use scriptures to reason with you because that is what you accept, you need to use research to reason with them because that is what they accept.
As far as saying it is complete truth, how do you prove the biggest part; that there is one god? It may contain all the true science in the world but neither you, nor anyone, can objectively prove that there is one god. If someone does not believe in one god, nothing will be able to convince them that it is divine and completely true because that part cannot be proven.
In terms of the truth, the polytheistic women are are inferior to believing women.
Because that faith is the truth.
I just have to point out that these are the kind of things that we cannot do. We can't go claiming that our beliefs are objectively true, that is considered preaching, and we can't demean or insult people. This is just a little reminder to remember the rules.
Last edited: