This is a great example of what I was talking about above.
The concept of a soul is readily accepted in religious circles as something that:
A) Exists
B) Needs to be saved
I'd ask what that basic assumption is even based on.
What makes you think there's a soul?
Why do you think that?
What makes you think it needs to be "saved"?
Why do you think that?
To the religionist, these questions seem needless and their answers self apparent.
You realize there are religions with no salvation component. Right.