Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Hi nutshell.nutshell said:What's the difference between the two?
A trinitarian unitarian or a trinitarian universalist? lol!lunamoth said:I'm a TU.
lilithu said:A trinitarian unitarian or a trinitarian universalist? lol!
You lost me...lunamoth said:I think only a trinitarian universalist makes sense...but I could consider the other a koan. Heck the Trinity is a koan to begin with!
Katzpur said:You lost me...
wiki said:A kō·an (公案; Japanese: kōan, Chinese: gōng-àn) is a story, dialogue, question, or statement in the history and lore of Chan (Zen) Buddhism, generally containing aspects that are inaccessible to rational understanding, yet that may be accessible to intuition. A famous koan is, "Two hands clap and there is a sound; what is the sound of one hand?" (oral tradition, attributed to Hakuin Ekaku, 1686-1769, considered a reviver of the koan tradition in Japan).
Yeah, that's what I was thinking, both.lunamoth said:I think only a trinitarian universalist makes sense...but I could consider the other a koan. Heck the Trinity is a koan to begin with!
lilithu said:Yeah, that's what I was thinking, both.
The thing is, for me the word unitarian doesn't just mean non-trinitarian. It means humanist. Because that's the theme that has run through Unitarian history, from the Transcendentalists to the influx of atheists to the influx of pagans.
Thomas Starr-King, a Unitarian (who used to have a statue in statuary hall in Congress until the California legislature decided to replace him with Ronald Reagan) put it this way:
Universalists believe that everyone is going to heaven because God is too good to condemn anyone.
Unitarians believe that everyone is going to heaven because we are too good for God to anyone.
It's a joke but that's the gist of the difference between Unitarians and Universalists. And what I love about that dichotomy is that we still end up in the same place. To me, Unitarian Universalism holds those two seemingly conflicting views together and says that they are really one and the same.
lilithu said:Universalists believe that everyone is going to heaven because God is too good to condemn anyone.
Unitarians believe that everyone is going to heaven because we are too good for God to anyone.
Maybe that's my problem!!!! See, electrons and particles and waves are over my head. Obviously I am never going to catch on to anything more complicated than that!lunamoth said:Lol...once you accept that an electron has the properties of a particle and a wave, holding two ideas like this at the same time don't really pose a problem.
Katzpur said:Maybe that's my problem!!!! See, electrons and particles and waves are over my head. Obviously I am never going to catch on to anything more complicated than that!
Yup. Supposedly one of the things that many UUs (and I suppose TUs too) have in common is that we are comfortable with uncertainty and paradoxlunamoth said:Lol...once you accept that an electron has the properties of a particle and a wave, holding two ideas like this at the same time don't really pose a problem.
Oh my goodness Lilithu, I wrote a sentence almost identical to that in my reply to Katz but then took it out...lilithu said:Yup. Supposedly one of the things that many UUs (and I suppose TUs too) have in common is that we are comfortable with uncertainty and paradox
humanist - theist
immanent - transcendant
inherent worth - universal grace
particle - wave
Oh here's another pair that I love:
love the world as it is - love the world as it should be
lunamoth said:I'm a TU.
Kay said:Hmmm. I must be very dense this evening, cause I just can't figure it out. PUT? :sorry1:
Kay said:Heh. By PU, I meant Pluraltarian Universalist. I googled pluraltarian cause I figured SOMEONE had to have used it sometime, but nope. I created a new word.