• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Universalist Christians and Animals

EverChanging

Well-Known Member
[Edit:
http://www.examiner.com/animal-rights-in-toronto/holy-canine-dog-receives-communion-toronto-church
This article is an example of how non-human animals, particularly domesticated pets, and their relevance to our spiritual lives may manifest in even traditional, trinitarian, sacramental churches, such as the Anglican Communion in places like the USA or Canada. I'm interested to know how some of the Universalist Christians here would respond.]

This question is geared toward UUs who tend to be Universalist Christians, but I'm sure non-Christian UUs of other traditions, especially eclectic ones, may be able to share relevant beliefs as well.

My personal practices are eclectic, but over time as I have learned and recovered from my religious past, I have found myself nurtured by Christianity again, specifically, sacramental Christianity, meaning in part that Holy Communion is more than purely a symbol -- it is a thin place, where heaven and earth meet.

I am also heavily influenced by Buddhism, particularly Zen Buddhism. I find the Upanishads of Hinduism more beautiful than most of the Christian Bible (though I will continue to explore the Bible because of my culture and own background, and I am fascinated by it.) I venerate the Virgin Mary and the saints and leave offerings because I find "God" everywhere -- all gods and goddesses, the saints, the Buddha, nature, animals. I love Shiva and Lucifer, god of light, and even the scary, bloody gods -- they are all a description of the human response to That. I love Voodoo, too, candles, incense, and I find it useful to bond with "lesser" manifestations of God than the Ultimate: experiences traditionally called "spirit guides."

Indeed, the divine is immanent everywhere in everything; it is nothing and everything. It is a wordless word. It is mother and father, brother, sister, friend, enemy, good, evil, light, dark. It is me and it is Not Me, beyond all love, perception. It is That.

Part of my rituals includes a practice that is "unorthodox" among most Christians, but I think most Christian UUs would not object. I consecrate Holy Communion in my own home, though I am no priest or minister, and I give it to everyone who wishes for it, including people of different faiths so that they can take Communion even when they can't in their own churches. All of these people reverence it, as do I, and all left over wine or crumbs are pourn onto grass or into flower beds and not thrown into the trash because it is a sacred offering.

The physical nature of the sacrament is purposeful, as God is immanent, and as a UU I respect the web of all life, including nature and animals without considering humans superior to even a blade of grass, or vice versa. Because of environmental concerns as well as empathy for the treatment of animals, especially in factory farms, I am a vegetarian transitioning into veganism, and I have always bonded closely with animals. I never shot an animal or hunted or abused them, though I was raised in a family where I was expected to hunt and kill and even teach dogs to be fierce and violent, so I was always ostracized and even denigrated in my family for kindness toward animals and even pets. In fact, in East Texas in a rural area, most dogs in my neighborhood were abused, chained, and trained to harm others as well as existing in pitiful conditions. I would find dogs that bit other children, often ones tangled in a chain around a tree, and I would visit them when the owners were away until they knew a human could be kind and would often become very friendly and even safe for my other childhood friends to pet or touch or play with.

Part of my universalistic Christian beliefs is that God is all life, embraces all life, loves all life, and I have often found animals to be more vulnerable and open to life, yes, even snakes and carnivores, animals who hunt and kill in a way that I have never been capable of doing. And because I find God in them, all animals I am able to bond with, I include in my rituals and prayers, including Holy Communion, and if bread and wine are not suitable for an animal, I use different elements. I share it with dying dogs and rats; cats and even the earth. I share the body of Christ because Christ is the offering for all existence, all life -- every blade of grass and mosquito.

As UU Universalist Christians, how do you differ in your attitude toward animals and nature than many of our more "orthodox" (whatever that is) Christian cousins? Do you find it fitting at all to share a sacred offering to God, even Holy Communion, with Christians and non-Christians? The baptized and the not? Infants? Adults? What about even those who can't understand the significance of the ritual, like an infant? How about a mentally retarded adult? Even your pets, a suffering animal, the Earth itself? How would you feel if you attended a home Communion ritual and the community shared this communal meal with their cherished pets or other animals?

If you are not a Christian but cherish other sacred rituals or rites, do you include non-human animals? Does it seem odd for a Christian to do so?

I apologize for the lengthy nature of this post. This is how I flesh out my theology and provoke creative responses from you all, that I might learn and enrich my perspective.
 
Last edited:

applewuud

Active Member
As UU Universalist Christians, how do you differ in your attitude toward animals and nature than many of our more "orthodox" (whatever that is) Christian cousins? Do you find it fitting at all to share a sacred offering to God, even Holy Communion, with Christians and non-Christians? The baptized and the not? Infants? Adults? What about even those who can't understand the significance of the ritual, like an infant? How about a mentally retarded adult? Even your pets, a suffering animal, the Earth itself? How would you feel if you attended a home Communion ritual and the community shared this communal meal with their cherished pets or other animals?

If you are not a Christian but cherish other sacred rituals or rites, do you include non-human animals? Does it seem odd for a Christian to do so?

Wow, interesting post. Universalist teaching is that all souls will eventually redeemed, baptized or not, Christian or not...but I don't know if they meant human or not. Personally, my spiritual attitude towards "animals" is informed by science, and the clear evidence that we all evolved over billions of years from a common ancestor, we all come from primordial DNA. My cat, my dog, and I all descended from a mouselike ancestor that was the first to feed its young from mammary glands. This undercuts any belief that somehow God made human beings separate and more holy than other life. We have special responsibilities, perhaps, because we have special consciousness, but we do not have a god-given "dominion over the earth" to do as we please. The trend is to become aware that we should overcome our "species-ism" just as we've moved away from racism and sexism.

On the other hand, I'm not a vegetarian or vegan. I accept that nature is also "red in tooth and claw", life evolved to prey on other life. (But let's not distract this thread with that debate...there are other places for that.) I respect vegetarianism, and it's interesting that kosher tradition is basically one step removed from vegetarianism in that you can eat plant-eating animals, but not animals that eat other animals.

Communion is an interesting ritual to me, and it's too bad that my church doesn't ever offer it. It would be nice once in a while, as would be a "blessing of the animals" ceremony. I have found, however, when communion is repeated week after week, it loses its magic and meaning. Where it is offered, I have no objection to it being offered to any person or animal, in a respectful way, at a communal meal. Our commonality is much stronger than our separateness, and I see no reason to exclude anyone.

It reminds me that Ralph Waldo Emerson left the Unitarian ministry over not wanting to serve communion. I wonder what the details of his stance were? We'll have to look it up...
 

EverChanging

Well-Known Member
My attitude about animals is also shaped by biology and other sciences and ideas. I do agree with you that nature can be "red in tooth and claw," which is also part of the Divine to me; I do mention that I respect carnivorous animals, but it is important to note that factory farming as it is practiced today is a far cry from the practice of hunting for survival, especially where there is no other food source. In such a situation, a species should hunt and eat or else that species will go out of existence in that location, which is often bad for the ecosystem and balance of life. However, I am not dependent on meat for either health or survival and especially not factory farming, which arguably has negative environmental consequences in addition to the animal cruelty. Our 7th principle requires us to consider how our eating and other habits affect not just humans, but the "interdependent web of all life," which ties into how I see Communion, whether it's with bread and wine, the Flower Communion, or sharing ale and cakes with my neo-pagan friends.

I tend to receive Communion, alone or with others, including animals, every week and sometimes daily. It is a part of my meditation and is a contemplative, mindful experience. Certainly there are times when I experience a great deal of emotion in the act and release emotion in my tears. It can be ecstatic, even mystical, but for me, it is not about a magical feeling. It's like meditation. I might feel very happy and even joyous after a meditation session one day, but I try to meditate for a set amount of time every day, whether or not I feel anything at all. Feelings aren't the point.

But then again, I'm not a very "traditional" UU, if there is such a thing. ;)

Interesting point about Emerson. I wasn't aware of the fact. It seems to me that our American Unitarian and Universalist forebears were quite iffy about pomp and circumstance, much as modern UUs, but I must say the Flower Communion is a very sacred ritual to me, and it is good for people who associate traditional Communion with trauma or literal dogmas.
 

uu_sage

Active Member
As a Christian Universalist, I believe that all living beings are God's children created in the divine image and we are called to be stewards of the Lord's good creation. Since all souls, Christian or not, are headed for salvation, and since all are held in God's extravagant love and grace, all are welcome at Christ's table. This is not a Protestant table nor a Catholic table but this is God's table. People are free to interpret the wine and the bread in light of their experience and to develop their understandings of what communion means to them. Communion gives us as disciples of Jesus food for the journey of life and responding to the call of God for justice, liberation, inclusion and transformation. The kingdom of God, Jesus said, is present in our midst. We are co-creators with God in transforming the human race into the human family. As one famous soul, "Christ has no body but ours, and has no hands but ours".
 

EverChanging

Well-Known Member
As a Christian Universalist, I believe that all living beings are God's children created in the divine image and we are called to be stewards of the Lord's good creation. Since all souls, Christian or not, are headed for salvation, and since all are held in God's extravagant love and grace, all are welcome at Christ's table. This is not a Protestant table nor a Catholic table but this is God's table. People are free to interpret the wine and the bread in light of their experience and to develop their understandings of what communion means to them. Communion gives us as disciples of Jesus food for the journey of life and responding to the call of God for justice, liberation, inclusion and transformation. The kingdom of God, Jesus said, is present in our midst. We are co-creators with God in transforming the human race into the human family. As one famous soul, "Christ has no body but ours, and has no hands but ours".

So how do you feel about giving Communion to say, infants, the mentally impaired, and non-human animals?
 

uu_sage

Active Member
All means all including the mentally ill. As for infants they would be allowed to receive the sacrament as long as they understand what communion is. Yes I would serve communion to animals and would have a blessing of the animals to go along with it.
 

EverChanging

Well-Known Member
So what about a newborn who can't speak? Or a mentally retarded adult? Should it depend on the ability to understand?
 

EverChanging

Well-Known Member
Okay. Sorry if I'm being tedious here, but I'm trying to understand other perspectives.

So if it depends on ability, it's not for all?

And if understanding must precede receiving it, why would you give it to non-human animals? But not a newborn who can't speak or understand?
 

uu_sage

Active Member
The Sacrament is for all. All means all. No one is excluded from God's table. Accommodations need to be made for those who need it- including those who are alcoholics (providing grape juice), and there needs to be sensitivity to God's disabled children. What I meant to say is that in the case of young children or mentally challenged people, somebody next to them needs to explain the significance of the sacrament in ways they understand. Animals would receive the elements without hesitation.
 

JonathanCid

Member
I think most Unitarian Universalists wouldn't think that communion with animals is strange or inappropriate, but UU communion is very different from Anglican or, say, Catholic communion. In the Catholic Church, giving the Body of Christ to an animal that isn't supposed to have a soul would cause a great deal of scandal, for example. I suppose some Episcopalians/Anglicans would take offense at the same because they'd figure it somehow demeans the service of the Eucharist. But for most Universalist Christians or UUs, I would think the "interdependent web of all existence" is sacred in and of itself and worthy of honoring during a communion service.
 

EverChanging

Well-Known Member
I think most Anglicans take offense, but at least one priest communicated a dog, though she did get in some trouble......

One priest I know mentioned that when the left over elements are disposed of, one proper form of disposal is giving it to birds on clean earth. I like that.
 
Top