Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Apparently one in which revenue is supposed to be balanced with expenditures. It is not the one liberals live in but I am afraid it is the one you will be shocked back into when China cuts us off. Exactly what additional thing were the republicans asking for? They wanted what we have to be cut, they were not asking for anything additional. But why only spend what you actually have right?What alternative universe are you living in?
So far two posts, two sarcastic rants, no relevant arguments, and no evidence. Good work.
The Debt is clearly more important to get under control than the environment. Thank you.
Oh, come now, Phil, you now very well that if you get three economists together, after a half hour the only thing they will agree on is that the other two are nuts.
Why in the world are they talking about each others nuts?
Ok, so far.
Republicans have increased the debt. Liberals have increased it far more. Republicans produced some of the best unemployment numbers and best economies for it. Carter, FDR, and Obama have spent more money and the economy and employment got worse. How did Obama spend enough money in one bill to pay every unemployed person $60,000 a year and have zero unemployment, only to have it get worse. How is that even possible? Bill Clinton could not even control himself. It was Newt Gingrich that wrote the budgets and made the cuts and Bill's realization that if he did not become far more conservative he had no chance to be re-elected that produced the surplus.
No they do not. There is no religious argument against global warming from any conservative. There are many reasons to believe it is occurring but few to blame it on man. The ocean produces almost all CO2 not cars. Religious people are not as scared of it as people without any faith but they do not make religious arguments about it.
Lets definitely stop all those evil corporations so that no one will have a job. They exploit what?
Just one liberal alone (FDR) took a dollar worth $1.17 and in 8 years made it worth less than $.20 and wrecked our entire economy. Carter created the worst inflation in memory and created the housing bubble. Clinton doubled down on it. In 2002 republicans in hearing said it was a bubble and the liberal said it was not (very similar to what you are doing) it burst and they blamed it on Bush. Yes republicans at times increase debt and do other things that are wrong. The liberals specialize in doing so and do it far more, far bidder, and without stop. At least Reagan created something with what he spent, bankrupted Russia, brought down the wall, had a thriving economy and low unemployment. Bush fought two wars. Obama ended both spent far more money and some how in spite of that lost jobs.
The US will not be here to do anything if things no liberal on earth will do are not done as this latest my way or the highway shutdown proved. In fact they have already probably spent us into a place where no recovery is possible.
They may protect the environment but they do the exact opposite of reducing debt. Have you never looked at a debt chart for the past 100 years? Liberals can't fight (they started and lost the only war we have ever lost), they make every moral mistake legislation can be used to accomplish, they have no economic ability (they have fathered the two worse pieces of economic legislation in history, getting off the gold standard and Obama care, they have ruined the greatest school system in history, Medicare, plus social security, and are ruining the greatest health care system in history). Spending money was the one thing they could do well and you are taking even that away (but you they won't let you, it's all they have).
So only the government should spend more than they have? I should have known since it is working so well. The general principles behind household finance and Government economics are exactly the same or should be. At least the world would be better off if politicians did not lend money to themselves at interest, did not borrow to the point they can only pay the interest and only do that when we let them borrow more to do it with, and bleed what they depend on dry and make up lies why it is good for them. You are probably right that our government does not operate like a household does. You are not right in not suggesting they should (except in case of war). What is more certain than any fact in history is that what they are doing can't possibly end well unless they quit doing it. The only worse is to pretend that is not inescapable so that money can be stolen from generations not even born yet.
Is I know you are but what am I, the best you got?
yeah, like you could be trusted to keep score...
No one can count that high. I am going to leave you two hooded incoherents alone for now. I can't pry a relevant claim from either one.yeah, like you could be trusted to keep score...
I can't. I have earned all the money that Obama can throw away on green energy companies for one day. Have a good weekend and work on those jokes.
What alternative universe are you living in?