The naturalism based on dogmatic sensationist, atheistic, and materialistic assumptions, sometimes called scientism, is not compatible with theism. If naturalism is understood simply to be a rejection of supernaturalism, then it is compatible with certain forms of theism - such as Process Theism.
I generally agree with Ken Wilber's integral philosophy. While we can't make claims of knowing truth absolutely, we can judge the merits of a sytem of thought by looking at how integral the system is. A system which can integrate religion and science has more truth value than a system which denies a transcendent reality.
I believe Process Theism is an exception to your statement:
If naturalism as a worldview holds that everything can be explained thru natural law, then all forms of theism are incompatible with naturalism, imo.
Denying the existence of any kind of god which can intervene or occasionally interrupt nature's causal processes, Process Theists are in agreement with Whitehead "that all things great and small are conceivable as exemplifications of general principles which reign throughout the natural order... [so that] every detailed occurrence can be correlated with its antecedents in a perfectly definite manner, exemplifying general principles."
If we reject (for many reasons) the epistemology which is based on scientism, we find that mysticism can be integrated into a rational and scientific worldview. (See for example, RATIONAL MYSTICISM, by John Horgan.