Why do some Unitarian Universalists claim that your religion is becoming more Christian and exclusive of non-Christians and pluralism?
Some of these same people have a problem with using words like "church" and even "reverend". If a person is so opposed to religious terms and practices, why would they join a religion?
James
It's complicated.
Wow, where are you digging up all our dirty laundry anyway?
Unitarian Universalists are a diverse lot.
MANY of us come to the faith because we are religious refugees from our previous religions. For example, BGLT Christians who for various reasons did not feel welcome in Christianity anymore. Or people who just asked too many questions. A lot of these folks feel anger towards the faith that they had to leave, and most of these are ex-Christians. Whenever they hear words that remind them of Christianity, it brings up negative feelings. Feelings of hurt and rejection. Or associations of irrationality and discouragement from intellectual curiosity. They want religion but they don't want to be reminded of the negative things they left.
Some other UUs came to UU because they wanted more diversity - they wanted to be around people of all sorts of backgrounds - but they feel no hard feelings towards whence they came. Some of these were Christian and have nothing against Christianity but think that if our services are too Christian, then they might as well have stayed where they were instead of coming to us. Other UUs grew up Jewish or Hindu, etc. And their feeling is that they came for diversity - for what is good in all faith traditions to be lifted up, so why are they going to things called "churches" (instead of temples or synagogues) and why are the clergy called ministers (instead of rabbi or imam, etc.).
Still other UUs were born into UU. Despite having gone thru UU religious education (sunday school), they still don't know that much about the bible. They have no baggage (negative feelings) but also no connection (positive feelings) towards Christianity or other religions.
I would say that there are UUs who feel that we are a separate religion in our own right, so why do we keep using the terms of someone else's religion? Why not have our own names for our houses of worship or for our clergy? And then there are other UUs who feel that in order to be able to be in dialogue with other religious folk in this country, we have to know how to speak their language instead of inventing our own.
Like I said, it's complicated.
You should check out the "Language of Reverence" controversy that erupted after our president, Rev. Bill Sinkford, suggested that UUs should get more comfortable using religious language. Whew, boy! did people get upset.