Friend of Mara
Active Member
Mostly because that increases inequality rather than creates equality. And equality is needed for personal freedoms.How 'bout just lower their taxes and don't pay them anything at all!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Mostly because that increases inequality rather than creates equality. And equality is needed for personal freedoms.How 'bout just lower their taxes and don't pay them anything at all!
To ignore that it's a generality seems disingenuous.That is questionable. While some private housing providers are, others are decidedly not. So, to include all private housing (and storage) providers in one group seems disingenuous.
I would argue the landlord position is not required and the history is rooted in aristocratic European society. We didn't have a problem with housing before the housing market. It is currently the way that need is filled (albeit poorly) but it is not the way it has always been done and doubtfully the way it always will be.You see a detriment.
I see a benefit.
When housing was needed, developers,
construction companies, & landlords provided.
They are worth an interesting read.I've dug may holes & ditches.
I'm not aristocratic, but thank you for the accusation.I would argue the landlord position is not required and the history is rooted in aristocratic European society.
The housing market arose because people wanted housing.We didn't have a problem with housing before the housing market.
What is your current opinion of there being more homes than homeless?I'm not aristocratic, but thank you for the accusation.
Instead, I'm practical. Developers, construction companies,
& landlords provided what was needed. And we do it better
than government. I've seen their housing, its condition, &
how government treats them. We're better.
The concept of renting as we know it only began in the 1920's. Prior to that to be a tenant was almost lateral to a slave. It was also when we began to commodify housing for the middle class.The housing market arose because people wanted housing.
We provided.
Can you elaborate on your claim?What is your current opinion of there being more homes than homeless?
That is absurd.The concept of renting as we know it only began in the 1920's. Prior to that to be a tenant was almost lateral to a slave.
That we have more empty homes than we have homeless people. It seems a failure in design.Can you elaborate on your claim?
Are you not aware of tenant farming?That is absurd.
Oh you talking about thoooose factories? You talking about stuff made by child labor in Thailand, or sweatshops in India, and sold in Dollar Tree? Are you sure this is the argument you wanna make here?That doesn't make much sense.
Lots of factories produce things that people won't pay much for. Think about cheap stuff at Dollar General or Dollar Tree.
That’s because the people who work in those factories (sweatshops) getting paid $2 per day, and McDonalds has to pay at least minimum wage!Lots of factory made things are cheaper than many fast food items.
Definitely not those you talking about; it’s not like Dollar Tree sells products that say “Made in USA with Union labor” on the tag. (LOL)Not all factories are also related to mega corporations.
Really? How much more can McDonalds pay their employees? Would you like to crunch some numbers?McDonalds could easily afford to pay more than many of the local and very small factories scattered around Indiana.
Source?That we have more empty homes than we have homeless people. It seems a failure in design.
I know what tenant farming is.Are you not aware of tenant farming?
Well, first of all, you have presented no basis for that number.I disagree. I would say 90% of the people in good paying jobs have at some point in their lives worked a low paying job during their lifetime.
It's not always from those places. Much like Walmart, it's a mixed bag of results. Except damn near everything now is made in China. Some of it is made in America, some of it available for cheap.Oh you talking about thoooose factories? You talking about stuff made by child labor in Thailand, or sweatshops in India, and sold in Dollar Tree? Are you sure this is
Franchise owners aren't the corporate owners. Amd that's a part of what makes being one attractive. The franchisee gets to own the store while paying royalties to use the name, images and products of a much larger corporation. That also can help to reduce the financial risk of the franchisee.The average McDonalds owner makes a profit of $150,000.00 per year.
How Much McDonald's Franchise Owners Really Make Per Year
No, because you left a ton of numbers and facts out. Like how much the store makes, all of it's bills, royalties, and many other parts that must be considered for such a thing.Does that sound reasonable to you?
It would make sense in an environment where wage labor has been abolished.My biggest problem with UBI is the vast majority of the money goes to people who don't need it! I can't think of a worse example of waste than UBI
Here are a couple of links that says Post Office workers can make $72,000 per year and UPS drivers making $63,000. Is that enough for ya?Those start at $20-$25/hour.
Not in the USA. In the USA the greater the inequality, usually the better the poor are financially.Mostly because that increases inequality rather than creates equality. And equality is needed for personal freedoms.
Do you have more than anecdotal evidence to suggest that your claim is true even in a general sense?To ignore that it's a generality seems disingenuous.
I'll just avoid your usual bickering.Do you have more than anecdotal evidence to suggest that your claim is true even in a general sense?
If not, then why not simply toss in a qualifier. I imagine you might take exception to negative blanket statements about landlords.
Can make does mean will make. If its up to 72k, the average would likely be much lower.Here are a couple of links that says Post Office workers can make $72,000 per year and UPS drivers making $63,000. Is that enough for ya?
Home - US Postal exam
You are being redirected....
Is it bickering when one questions misleading claims?I'll just avoid your usual bickering.
I haven't seen it be a generality. Public housing usually isn't the best, but it usually has a bare minimum above many private units that I've seen. Better maintained as well.To ignore that it's a generality seems disingenuous.