• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Was the biblical Paul a Roman citizen or not?

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Yes...he was.
And modern historians agree on the fact that Roman citizenship could be gained by "Asiatici" (name given to those of the provinces of Asia) either by bribing a local administrator or by showing blind loyalty to the Empire.
Evidently Saul's family was a prestigious family that served the Roman authorities of Syria, where Tartos was.
 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
But if you have any idea what a Messiah is, you'd easily see why Paul is an anti-Pagan, anti-Roman operative when he's a Christian proselytizer.
Christianity and Messianism are different things. Paul's appeal to Caesar was implicit endorsement of the authority of Rome.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Christianity and Messianism are different things. Paul's appeal to Caesar was implicit endorsement of the authority of Rome.
Could you explain these opinions more thoroughly?

It's extremely different from what I was taught by Christians.

Are you a Christian, by your own lights?
Tom
 

sooda

Veteran Member
Christianity and Messianism are different things. Paul's appeal to Caesar was implicit endorsement of the authority of Rome.

Paul tried to persuade Nero not to kill him.

Paul Before Nero. First, Nero was the Caesar to whom Paul appealed when he was unjustly accused by the Jews and falsely imprisoned (cf. Acts 25:11). The apostle was taken to Rome and kept under guard for two years (Acts 28:30), before Nero finally heard his case.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
It's not really an opinion, the Jewish idea of a messiah is incompatible with the Christian idea of Christ.
Well, it is an opinion.

Jesus was no messiah. Not by Jewish standards.
But Christians changed the meaning of the word.

And created a religion!
Tom
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
According to Daniel he was. Nobody else confirmed the covenant.
I don't think that this is even close to true.

But, whatever. You seem to have your own religion, which is fine with me.
I think all religionists do.

Oh well.
Just don't tell me how to live my life based on your unsupported opinions and we'll get along fine.

Tom
 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
I don't think that this is even close to true.
Facts are facts.

And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself ...
Daniel 9:26

And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week ...
Daniel 9:27

For this is my blood of the new testament[diatheke=covenant], which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
Matthew 26:28
 

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Scholars would agree that while not impossible , it would have been unlikely.

Paul and Roman Citizenship

Could a Jew even be a Roman citizen?
Thanks for the link.

Yes, I think the conclusion is fair, Paul was probably not a Roman citizen, but it can't be ruled out so we can't know for sure.

Nor, as your link points out, is the author of Luke an accurate historian, rather a spin merchant. We get a hint of this when he opens by asserting the contrary.
 

GoodbyeDave

Well-Known Member
Some of the garrisons who served under Titus were Syrian, Egypt and Arabs of the Roman Empire. It was a path to Roman citizenship.
If you enlisted in the auxilia you got citizenship on your discharge. But a Jew would hardly enlist, because of the religious ceremonies involved.
 
Top