Taylor Seraphim
Angel of Reason
But OP didn't even ask about people, he asked about Religions. That in itself makes no sense.
I was replying to your question over why I care about my neighbor's religious views.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But OP didn't even ask about people, he asked about Religions. That in itself makes no sense.
404 not found
Okay not entirely true, those that exist usually seek asylum in the US.
First, my study of the paranormal shows me more than the physical level exists. Secondly, the sages and seers of the eastern traditions have described these things and they dovetail well with an analysis of the paranormal. Thirdly, I personally know of one particular spiritual master who I esteem above any doubts with evidence beyond any doubts.And why do you believe that?
First, my study of the paranormal shows me more than the physical level exists. Secondly, the sages and seers of the eastern traditions have described these things and they dovetail well with an analysis of the paranormal. Thirdly, I personally know of one particular spiritual master who I esteem above any doubts with evidence beyond any doubts.
Weather the belief is shared or not is irrelevant as it is true nonetheless.
Can you quote any prominent biologist?
I can do even better ... can direct you 2 an entire book - just search 4 John Ashton In Six Days.
It has 50 top scientists answering the question of why they don't accept evoution.
There are so many holes in the theory that it would take dozens of posts 2 list them all.
Something isn't true just because a lot of people "believe" it - applies 2 evolution and to religions.
Have a good one!
To be fair I think this is a human thing rather than a specifically religious thing, though a number of religious beliefs could be seen to have developed from this basis. Even in science we have concepts of assumptions and probability to create intermediate answers we can work with even though they might not be accurate. Fear of the unknown is one of our greatest limitations so we come up with all sorts of ways of establishing explanations for things we don’t know, some more rational than others.Scientists are happy with admitting they don't know all the answers (usually with the rider, "but we're looking into it") why do most (every?) religion have to have an answer for everything? Even if they make the answer up.
Perhaps that goes far to explain why you feel safe ignoring the religious convictions of your neighbors. In the town I live in, that's not a luxury.
Oh don't worry in return we have Islamists. But then again I am smart enough not to live next to them.
Scientists are happy with admitting they don't know all the answers (usually with the rider, "but we're looking into it") why do most (every?) religion have to have an answer for everything? Even if they make the answer up.
I can't speak for all Christians, but for myself, I don't need an answer for everything to have faith in God. I have many questions and things I don't understand, but I still have faith the Bible is true and Jesus Christ is Lord and God is still on His throne.
Romans 1:16-17 (ESVST) 16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. 17 For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith for faith, as it is written, "The righteous shall live by faith."
2Co 5:5-7 (ESVST) 5 He who has prepared us for this very thing is God, who has given us the Spirit as a guarantee. 6 So we are always of good courage. We know that while we are at home in the body we are away from the Lord, 7 for we walk by faith, not by sight.
By definition faith is belief without evidence.
How do you think that is a good way to determine if something is true?
Do you believe there is a God?
No, but I find the question to be irrelevant.
Do you find find faith (belief without evidence) to be an effective way of judging if something is true?
.
It has 50 top scientists answering the question of why they don't accept evoution.
Oh, that question.What effective way do you judge that there is no God? Belief without evidence?
While they do, indeed, exist, I do not know a single Jew who would claim that his/her religion has an answer for everything.... why do most (every?) religion have to have an answer for everything? Even if they make the answer up.
No, but I find the question to be irrelevant.
Do you find find faith (belief without evidence) to be an effective way of judging if something is true?
It is a good thing that whatever faulty assumptions @Taylor Seraphim might conceivably hold do not compromise his point here. I guess in that sense they are indeed irrelevant.I find your faulty assumptions to be irrelevant.