This is another generalization. Not all government is like that.
So you're into stating the obvious now?
Tis in the nature of generalization to be general, & not apply to all things.
Ahh, but you're the minority in all this.
Yes, those who start & build businesses will always be a minority.
What we say is that if you have a business you didn't build it by yourself.
No one claims to have built a business without interacting with other people, & using infrastructure.
The collective has made it possible for your business to strive the way it has. You didn't build the road, the schools or the community. You didn't build the internet either but everyone that has played a part in building those things has made it possible for your business to strive.
Tis a false argument, since no one disputes that.
Maybe...but having owned two businesses I don't see your point here. I've owned two businesses, worked for consulting firms, worked state and federal government and worked as a private contractor. So I have a well rounded perspective.
Since you're currently a government employee, your perspective is far different from mine. Of those I know who started & ran real businesses, none would every take a regular job again, even in private industry. We're just ruined for that environment. The fact that you aren't ruined tells me how different we are. Of course, I would consider being the country's dictator...but that's rather different from being a mere cog in the machine.
I know you want to put in that "other" category but your assessment of me is simply wrong.
Tis not about what I "want", but rather about what I observe.
You believe in a greater entitlement of government to our money.
You believe that a reduction in taxation is a subsidy the same as welfare.
I am very different from you on these issues.
If no one paid taxes how do you think they could function?
Oh, you big silly....I've never proposed doing away with taxes.
It is about lowering them, & creating a structure with better incentives.
It seems dwell too much on stereotypes of us anti-gov anti-tax types.
You should read my posts instead.
Tax reductions DO have to be paid for. That shortfall must be made up somehow. In order to do that you have to cut. In many cases politicians want to cut social programs before they cut any "subsidies" given to farmers, themselves or to corporations. This is one of the reasons the Bush Tax Cuts for any and everybody didn't work.
They needn't be "paid for" if government just cuts spending.
(And the "Bush Tax Cuts" actually increased revenue within 2 years.)